Article name Quality of Life in Modern Science and Practice: Theory and Empirism
Authors Liga M.B. Doctor of Sociology, Professor,
Shchetkina I.A. Candidate of Sociology, Associate Professor,
Zakharova E.Y. Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor,
Bibliographic description Liga M. B., Shchetkina I. A., Zakharova E. Yu. Quality of Life in Modern Science and Practice: Theory and Empirism // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 4. PP. 39–46. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-4-39-46
Heading Social philosophy
UDC 332.1
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-4-39-46
Article type
Annotation At the end of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty- first century, the quality of life became the leading trend of development of world civilization. Representatives of different areas of scientific knowledge ‒ psychologists, philosophers, physicians, sociologists, historians, etc. addressed this perspective. This concept was often used in program documents of parties and governments and election campaigns. The appeal to a perspective of quality of life in science and practice was determined by change moving development of society, the increasing role of a human factor in social and economic processes. In this article, we disclose theoretical and applied aspects of quality of life, designate their interaction, give an assessment of quality of life on the basis of the selected indicators, i. e. the standard of living, life satisfaction, satisfaction with a situation in the country and point of accommodation. In this research, the quality of life is understood as satisfaction with the personality with extent of implementation not only material but also social, spiritual and cultural needs determined by the standard of living of the individual, the system of values, personal perception. In 2019, the Faculty of Sociology, research institute of social and humanitarian problems of Transbaikal State University carried out the sociological research “Assessment of Quality of Life of the Population and Activity of Local Governments of Transbaikal Territory” aimed at studying the quality of life of the population. The analysis of data revealed that in the social structure of Transbaikal Territory, the most numerous is the cluster with the average level of wellbeing; most respondents considered that there are no conditions for self-realization in Transbaikal Territory and municipal districts (city districts); most respondents characterized their mood as optimistic.
Key words quality of life, standard of living, satisfaction, social mood, indicators, models
Article information
References 1. Bestuzheva-Lada, I. V. Alternative civilization. M: Algoritm, 2003. (In Rus.) 2. Bobkov, V. N., Kvachev, V. G., Subetto, A. I., Scherbakova, O. I. Schools of sciences of a research of quality of life and the social structures caused by it in Russia. Uroven’ zhizni naselenija regionov Rossii, no. 4, pp. 7–23, 2016. (In Rus.) 3. Gelbreit, Dzh. K. Economic theories and purposes of society / transl. from English, M: Progress, 1973. (In Rus.) 4. Emel’yanov, A. M. Assessment of efficiency of social projects on the basis of indicators of quality of life of the population. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teorija i praktika, no. 21, pp. 43–52, 2010. (In Rus.) 5. Liga, M. B., Schetkina, I. A. Quality of life: organizational and administrative aspect. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2011. (In Rus.) 6. Liga, M. B., Zakharova, E. Yu., Tomskikh, M. S. Quality management of life. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2018. (In Rus.) 7. Mitin, M. B. Scientific and technological revolution, conduct of life and ideological fight. Problemy sotsialisticheskogo obraza zhizni. M: Nauka, 1977. (In Rus.) 8. Pigu, A. S. Economic theory of welfare. M: Progress, 1985. (In Rus.) 9. Popov, S. I. Problem of quality of life in modern ideological fight. M: Politizdat, 1977. (In Rus.) 10. Subetto, A. I. Future of Russia: doctrine of revival and sustainable development of the country. Obrazovanie i sotsial’noe razvitie regiona. Barnaul: Altaiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1999. (In Rus.) 11. Toffler, E. The third wave. M: AST, 1999. (In Rus.) 12. Toschenko, Zh. T. Social mood – a phenomenon of the modern sociological theory and practice. Sotsiologicheskie issledovanija, pp. 21−34, no.1, 1998. (In Rus.) 13. Forrester, Dzh. World dynamics. M: Progress, 1978. (In Rus.) 14. Harchenko, K. V. Satisfaction: methodology and experience of municipal researches. M: AL’PERIJa, 2011. (In Rus.) 15. Aron, R. Progress and Disillusion Hammonds worth: Penguin Books Ltd. 1972. (In Engl.) 16. Bell, D. The Social Framework of the Information Society. Oxford, 1980. (In Engl.) Sources 17. Grigor’ev, S. I., Guslyakova L. G. Sociology in preparation and activity of the specialist in social work in Russia. Barnaul: Azbuka, 2001. (In Rus.) 18. Constitution of the Russian Federation. St.7, p. 1. (In Rus.) 19. The order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 10.06.2011 No. 1021-r “About the approval of the Concept of decrease in administrative barriers and increases in availability of the public and municipal services for 2011–2013 and the Plan of measures on implementation of the specified Concept”. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF. 2011. № 26, st. 3826. (In Rus.) 20. Quality of life in Russian regions – the rating of 2018. Web: 03.03.2019. (In Rus.) 21. Presidential decree of April 28, 2008 No. 607 “About assessment of efficiency of activity of local government bodies of city districts and municipal districts”. (In Rus.) 22. Presidential decree of the Russian Federation of June 28, 2007 No. 825 “About assessment of efficiency of activity of executive authorities of territorial subjects of the Russian Federation”. (In Rus.) 23. The Federal Law of 27.07.2010 No. 210-FZ (an edition of 03.12.2011) “About the organization of providing the public and municipal services”. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF, 2010. (In Rus.)
Full articleQuality of Life in Modern Science and Practice: Theory and Empirism