Article name Formation of Regional Elite and Problem of Maintaining Cultural Identity of Siberian Regions and the Russian Far East
Authors Chistanov M.N. Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor,
Bibliographic description Chistanov M. N. Formation of Regional Elite and Problem of Maintaining Cultural Identity of Siberian Regions and the Russian Far East // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 4. PP. 81–86. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-4-81-86.
UDK 130.2
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-4-81-86
Article type
Annotation Regional identity is usually considered as a certain type of consciousness of the population of the territory. The intelligentsia plays an important role in this process. They form an image of the region, popularize and extend this image among other population of the region and outside the region. The research presented relies on post-colonialism methodology, popular in modern social science. We suggest the hypothesis of a research: the colonial nature of development of Siberia and the Far East leads to formation of specific type of the regional intellectuals, which are characterized by the expressed tendency to a gap with the local culture and the accelerated change of demographic base. In the course of globalization, the geographical remoteness of Siberia and the Far East stops being the factor constraining migration. As a result, carriers of regional identity are hostages of colonial policy and in the second or third generation they seek to leave the historical homeland. It leads to considerable transformation of cultural identity of Siberian and the Far East regions and can be considered as potential threat of the Russian statehood.
Key words regional identity, intellectuals, migration, educational migration, Siberia, Far East
Article information
References 1. Aksyutin, Yu. M. Transformation of personal identity structure in the regions of post-Soviet Russia and its impact on interethnic relations: the cases of the republics of Tuva, Khakassia and Altai. The New research of Tuva, pp. 162–174, no. 2, 2016. (In Rus.) 2. Anzhiganova, L. V., Topoeva, M. V. Khakasses under the conditions of globalization: mental deformations. The New Research of Tuva, pp. 100–111, no. 3, 2017. DOI:10.25178/nit.2017.3.6 (In Rus.) 3. Artamonova, N. Ya. The peculiarities of formation of national intelligentsia of Sayan-Altay peoples. The Buryat State University Bulletin, pp. 63–67, no. 7, 2011. (In Rus.) 4. Artamonova, N. Ya. Khakass scholars about the role of national intelligentsia in ethno-political processes of the Republic of Khakassia. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice, pp. 24–27, vol. 74, no. 12, part 3, 2016. (In Rus.) 5. Gladyshevsky, A. N, Maynagashev, S. D. 1886–1920. Essay on life and work. Abakan: Khakas. gos. un-t im. N. F. Katanova, 1999. (In Rus.) 6. Krestyanova, L. S. The interethnic relations and migration processes at the regional level: problems and main tendencies of development. Ekonomika regiona, pp. 815–825, no. 3, 2016. DOI: 10.17059/2016–3-17. (In Rus.). 7. Kudashkin, V. A., Ivanchenko, E. V. Role of national intelligentsia in preserving the ethnic identity among small indigenous peoples of the Russian North and Siberia in 1985–2011. Issues of Social ‒ Economic Development of Siberia, pp. 109–113, no. 1, 2016. (In Rus.) 8. Mamysheva, E. P. Social and political activities of S. D. Maynagashev. Russia and Khakassia: 290 years of joint development. Abakan: KhakaS. gos. un-t im. N. F. Katanova, 1998: 126–131. (In Rus.) 9. Mikhaylov, D. A. The Ideologeme of Revival and the Construction of Altai Nationalism. Forum for Anthropology and Culture, pp. 63–85, no. 31, 2016. (In Rus.) 10. Osinsky, I. I., Dobrynina, M. I. The intelligentsia and culture of Siberian peoples in the context of globalization: some developmental problems. Social processes in modern Russian society: problems and prospects. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical with international participation Conference. Irkutsk: Asprint, 2017: 4–11. (In Rus.) 11. Said, Ed. W. Orientalism. Saint Petersburg: Russian world, 2016. (In Rus.) 12. Sushko, A. V. About the role of Buryat-Mongolian nationalism in Pan-Mongolian movement. Vestnik of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, pp. 73–79, no. 2, 2008. (In Rus.) 13. Tenzin, Ch. M.-H. Tuvan national intelligentsia amidst the transformation of Russian society. The New Research of Tuva, pp. 69–91, no. 2, 2015. (In Rus.). 14. Khamidulin, V. S. Theoretical perspectives in immigrant incorporation research. Humanities Research in the Russian Far East, pp. 49–60, no 1, 2016. (In Rus.) 15. Anzhiganova, L., Asochakova, V., Topoeva, M. Ethno-confessional neotraditionalism in a globalized world: Search for basis of identification. Revista de Humanidades, pp. 141–151, vol. 30, 2017. DOI: 10.5944/rdh.30.2017.18206. (In Engl.) 16. Chakrabarty, D. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press, 2000. (In Engl.) 17. Safronov, S. Russian population ethnic structure: trends and transformations. Baltic region, pp. 106–120, no. 3, 2015. DOI:10.5922/2079-8555-2015–3-9. (In Engl.) 18. Yang X-l, Liu L, Shi Y-y, Li Y-s, Tan X, Hu Xm, et al. The Relationship between Cultural Anxiety and Ethnic Essentialism: The Mediating Role of an Endorsement of Multicultural Ideology. PLoS ONE, e0141875, no. 10, vol. 11, 2015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141875. (In Engl.)
Full articleFormation of Regional Elite and Problem of Maintaining Cultural Identity of Siberian Regions and the Russian Far East