| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Media Discourse in Social Networks: Lexical and Semantic Options |
| Authors | Teplyashina A.N. Doctor of Philology, Professor, a-nik@list.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Teplyashina A. N. Media Discourse in Social Networks: Lexical and Semantic Options // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 5. PP. 110–118. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-5-110-118. |
| Section | AXIOLOGY OF MASS MEDIA |
| UDK | 070.4 |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-5-110-118 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article aims to assess the scale of the new paradigms formation of journalists’ speech behavior and the feedback frame with readers. The object of the study was the network version of Novaya Gazeta, which is hosted on the social network VKontakte. For the first time, the cumulative content of publications and comments in social networks is studied, for which the methods of discourse analysis and content analysis were used. The topic of modern transformations of euphemisms functioning on the Internet and profanity, ways of forming a network identity are considered. The article explores the functioning in the network space of media texts with provocative content, forming a social underground in new media. The results of the publications content study in online versions of top publications demonstrate popular strategies of the media: criticism of the authorities and control over the authorities’ actions. Participants of communication in the style of irony and sarcasm develop political themes. User comments are identified as feedback. Journalists who generate provocative discourse play a special role in the configuration of social space. Social psychologists and political scientists believe that this may be the reason for the design of “twitter revolutions”, “Facebook revolutions”. The study of the consequences of journalists’ professional participation in the information opposition actualizes the problem of theoretical understanding of the destructive content information and the role of professional journalists in maintaining a culture of communication in the country’s media space. The theoretical substantiation of the development of an actual practical journalism strategy is necessary. The article analyzes the media text of journalist D. Bykov as a matrix of provocative discourse that causes a chain reaction of comments with polar connotation. The task is to clarify some of the relationship problems between linguistic and non-linguistic (“extra linguistic”) factors affecting the emotional load of the text, its cultural and cultural specifics. |
| Key words | discourse, provocative discourse, taboo vocabulary, euphemism, frame, slot, concept |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Gasparov, B. Language, memory, image. Linguistics of language existence. M: New Literary Review, 1996. (In Rus.) 2. Kangaspunta, V. Online news comments: Social network and emergent public. Information Society, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 275–288, 2018. (In Engl.) 3. Yahav, I., Schwartz D. Citizen engagement and exploring the online experience in censored online news articles. Information Communication and Society, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1620–1638, 2018. (In Engl.) 4. Moreira Aguirre, D., Perez Samaniego, S., Altamirano Benitez, V., Marin-Gutierrez, I. Citizen influence on socialization for democratization of communicatin. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, no. 154, pp. 207–228, 2019. (In Engl.) 5. Hargreaves, E., Agosti, C., Menasche, D., Neglia, G., Reiffers-Masson, A., Altman, E. Biases in the Facebook news feed: A case study on the Italian elections. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Networks. ACM, vol. 8508659, ASONAM, Barcelona, 2018: 806–812. (In Engl.) 6. Das, D., Clark, A. Sarcasm detection on Facebook: A supervised learning approach. International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ICMI, vol. 3. Boulder; United States, 2018: 1–5. (In Engl.) 7. Lockyer, S. A two-pronged attack?: Exploring Private Eye’s satirical humor and investigative reporting. Journalism Studies, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 765–781, 2006. (In Engl.) 8. Zubov, A. Modern Russian society and civil society: overlapping bounderies. In: Pro et Contra, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 35, 1996. (In Rus.) 9. Vartanova, E. What does media convergence lead to? Information society, vol. 5, pp. 11–14, 1999. (In Rus.) 10. Kobozeva, I. The Linguopragmatic Aspect of Media Language Analysis. In: Language of Media, 233. M: Alma Makr, 2008. (In Rus.) 11. Leontiev, A. Psychology of Impact in Mass Communication. In: Language of Media, 138. M: Alma Makr, 2008. (In Rus.) 12. Brodsky, N. Literary Encyclopedia: A Dictionary of Literary Terms. Publishing House of Frenkel, Leningrad, 1925. (In Rus.) 13. Akhmanova, O. A dictionary of linguistic terms. 2nd ed. M: Editorial URSS, 2004. (In Rus.) 14. Vedenskaya, T., Osipova, Yu. The place of euphemisms in the lexical system of language. Proceedings of Moscow Youth Scientific Practical Conference. Current problems of social humanitarian knowledge. М: MSU, 2015: 164–170. (In Rus.) 15. Bondarenko, V. Essays on Kirsanovskiy district Tambov ue. Ethnographic review, pp. 79–80, vol. 3, no. 4, 1890. (In Rus.) |
| Full article | Media Discourse in Social Networks: Lexical and Semantic Options |
| 0 | |
| 22 | |
