| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Ruling Clans of the Eastern Jin Era (317–420 AD) and Early Chinese Buddhism |
| Authors | Tsyrenov C.T. Candidate of History, chts17@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | 6 Sakhyanovoy st., Ulan-Ude, 670047, Russia |
| Section | ARCHEOGRAPHY: CULTURAL CODES OF ASIA |
| UDK | 1(031)+221 |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-6-150-155 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The urgency of the problems raised in the article is due to the fact that it is impossible to reconstruct the most important, crisis and decisive stage of early medieval Chinese statehood and culture without identifying and analyzing specific historical factors for the successful restoration of the former All- Chinese Jin Dynasty in the form of the Southern Chinese Eastern Jin Dynasty. This dynasty had a profound impact on the development of management methods for all subsequent regional and national empires. The originality lies in the author’s translations of the biographical data of the highest dignitaries from the biographies of the “Jin shu” chronicle (“The History of the Jin Dynasty”), which was not translated into European languages. To complete the presentation of historical data, the author drew on methods of historical geography and ethnopsychology. The goal is to identify little-known concrete historical facts by translating and analyzing primary sources, as well as domestic, Western and Chinese articles and monographs. The author briefly reviewed and analyzed three complex, important and poorly studied problems associated with the historical and political process and the history of early Chinese Buddhism of the troubled era of East Jin. First, the problem of classifying the court clans and groups of the East Jin era. Second, the problem of determining the real subject of the highest state political power. Third, the problem of religious, ideological and philosophical preferences of the Eastern Jin monarchs, as well as representatives of the court elite of this era. Particular attention is paid to the place and role of the so-called external court clans (clans of the mother, wife or son-in-law of the reigning emperor) in the political history of the East Jin era. It is concluded that during the period of Eastern Jin there was an important shift in the religious and ideological preferences of the South Chinese elite ‒ from Taoism to Chinese Buddhism. |
| Key words | South China, Eastern Jin (317–420 AD), state apparatus, dignitary, Early Chinese Buddhism |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Ermakov, M. E. World of the Chinese buddhism. SPb: Andreev and sons, 1994: 188–207. (In Rus.) 2. Kollins, R. Sociology of philosophy: Global theory of the intellectual transformations / transl. by Rozov, N. S., Vertgeim, Yu. B. Novosibirsk: Sibirskij Hronograf, 2002. (In Rus.) 3．Komisarova, T. G. Monk should not bow to the emperor: from the Buddhist polemic of IV–VI cent. Buddhism and the state on the Far Eas. M: Nauka, 1987: 47–70. (In Rus.) 4．Kryukov, M. V., Malyavin, V. V., Sofronov, M. V. Chinese ethnicity on the threshold of the Middle Ages. M: Nauka, 1979. (In Rus.) 5. Kravtsova, M. E. Eastern Jin dynasty (317 – 420 AC). The history of China from ancient times to the beginning of the XXI century in 10 v. Vol. 3. Three Kingdoms, Jin, Southern and Northern dinasties, Sui, Tan (220–907 AC). M: Nauka, 2014: 111–124. (In Rus.) 6. Martynov, A. S. Huiyuan. Monk should not bow to the emperor. Buddism in translations: Almanac. SPb., 1993. Part 2: 179–191. (In Rus.) 7. Nepomnin, O. E., Ivanov, N. A. Tipology of the Asian societies. M: Vostochnaya literatura, 2010. (In Rus.) 8. Huijiao. Biographies of worthy monks (Gao seng zhuan) / transl. from chin., research, comment. and index by M. E. Ermakov. In 3 v. V. II (Part 2: Translation). SP.: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie, 2005: 69–85. (In Rus.) 9. Huijiao. Biographies of worthy monks (Gao seng zhuan) / transl. from chin., research, comment. and index by M. E. Ermakov. In 3 v. V. I (Part 1: Translation) / executive editor L. N. Men’shikov. M: Nauka, GRVL, 1991. (In Rus.) 10. Chebunin, A. V. The history of the penetration and formation of Buddhism in China. Ulan-Ude: Izd.-poligr. Complex FGOU VPO VSGAKI, 2009. (In Rus.) 11. Kenneth, K. S. Ch’en. Buddhism in China A Historical Survey. Princeton: University Press, 1966: 110–115. (In Engl.) 12. Liebenthal Walter. Shih Huiyuan’s Buddhism as Set Forth in his Writings. Journal of the american Oriental Society, pp. 243–259. vol, 70, no, 4, 1950. (In Engl.) 13. Robinson, R. H. Early Mādhyamika in India and China. Publisher, Samuel Weiser, 1976. (In Chin.) 14. 汤用彤. 汉魏两晋南北朝佛教史. 北京: 北京大学出版社. 2011. 563 页 = Tang Yongtong. The History of Buddhism in the Han, Wei and Jin Dynasties. Beijing, «Beijing university press», 2011. (In Chin.) 15. 田余庆. 东晋门阀政治. 北京: 北京大学出版社. 2000. 375 页 = Tian Yuqing. Eastern Jin Noble Clan Policy. Beijing, «Beijing university press», 2000. (In Chin.) 16. 王仲荦. 魏晋南北朝史. 上海: 上海人民出版社. 2003. 第296–353 = Wang Zhongluo. Wei Jin Southern and Northern Dynasties. Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe, 2003: 296–353. (In Chin.) 17. Zürcher, E. The Buddhist conquest of China: the spread and adaptation of Buddhism in early medieval China. Leiden, 2007. 3d ed. p. cm. (In Chin.) |
| Full article | Ruling Clans of the Eastern Jin Era (317–420 AD) and Early Chinese Buddhism |
| 0 | |
| 29 | |
