Article
Article name Concept of Power in M. Kheraskov’s Epic Poems through the Lens of Masonic Worldview (L. K. de Saint-Martin, I. V. Lopukhin)
Authors Yaklyushina M.S. Master Student, Asalia15@mail.ru
Bibliographic description
Section POETICS AND HISTORY OF THE TEXT
UDK УДК 82.13
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-1-8-16
Article type
Annotation This article explores certain aspects of masonic worldview, which have to do with the problem of pow¬er and the image of the perfect ruler, in epic poems “Rossiyada”, “Vladimir Reborn” and “Tsar, or Novgorod Saved” by M. M. Kheraskov. The last of these works is analyzed in this key for the first time. The poems are interpreted in the context of philosophic and religious texts, important to Russian masons in the second half of the 18th century: “On delusions and the truth” by L. K. de Sen-Martin, and “Some musings on the Inner Church” by I. V. Lopukhin. The author of the article focuses on the fact that in masonic philosophy spiritual self-improvement leads one to becoming closer to the state of being before the fall of man, and in Sen-Martin’s work, this state is linked to the nature of political power. Therefore, the article states. That when the poems by Kheraskov describe the path of self-improvement, walked by a ruler, ways in which the ruler is morally superior to his subjects, he not only presents the masonic ideal of a perfect person and monarch but also legitimizes the power that the ruler in the poem holds. The allusions to masonic concepts of “inner” and “outer” self, “spiritual” and material body, of spiritual blindness and clear vision can be interpreted as markers of ruler’s realization of his need of spiritual and moral self-improvement, and of subjects’ need of guidance. In light of all this, the author of the article interprets the conflict in the epic poem “Tsar…” as one between the duty of a ruler to restore order and stop the moral degradation of his subjects, and the humanistic nature of the ideal ruler, that recoils from using force and shedding blood. The analysis performed in this article allows one to better understand Kheraskov’s thoughts on power through explaining some parts of masonic philosophy that influenced them.
Key words Russian literature, the 18th century, M. M. Kheraskov, “Rossiyada”, “Valdimir Reborn”, “Tsar, or Novgorod Saved”
Article information
References 1. Abramzon, T. E. Poetic mythologies of the 18th century: Lomonosov, Sumarokov, Kheraskov, Derzhavin. Magnitogorsk: Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Magnitogorsk. State University. 2006. (In Rus.) 2. Artemieva, T. V. Sophiocratic ideals and epistemological utopias of Michail Kheraskov. Philosophical century. Almanac. Vol.12. Russian Utopia: from ideal state to ideal society. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg center of history of ideas, 2000: 3–47. (In Rus.) 3. Davydov, G. A. Religious and Philosophical poems by M. M. Kheraskov: cand. phil. sci. diss. Moscow. 1999. (In Rus.) 4. Zapadov, A. V. XVIII century poets. M: Moscow state univ. press, 1984. (In Rus.) 5. Zorin, A. L. “Feeding the two-headed eagle”: Literature and state ideology in Russia in the last third of XVIII century – first third of XIX century. M: New literary review, 2001. (In Rus.) 6. Kochetkova, N. D. Literature of Russian sentimentalism: aesthetical and artistic searches. St. Petersburg: Science, 1994. (In Rus.) 7. Levitt, M. Visual dominant in Russia of the XVIII century. M: New Literary Review, 2015. (In Rus.) 8. Limanskaya, Y. S. Works of M. M. Kheraskov “The Golden Twig” and “Kadm and Harmony” in the context of masonic prose of the last quarter of the XVIII century: cand. phil. sci. diss. Surgut, 2007. (In Rus.) 15 Poetics and history of the text Humanitarian Vector. 2020. Vol. 15, N 1 9. Longinov, M. N. N. Novikov and Moscow martinists. St. Petersburg: Lan’, 2000. (In Rus.) 10. Masonry in its past and present / Y. L. Barskov, A. A. Borovoy, A. M. Vasiytinsky and others; edited by S. P. Melgunova, N. P. Sidorova. M: IKPA, 1991. (In Rus.) 11. Orlov, P. A. Russian sentimentalism. M: Moscow state univ. printing house, 1977. (In Rus.) 12. Prikazchikova, E. E. Moral and religious concept of a person in the poem by M. Kheraskov “Vladimir Reborn”. Classical poetry and religious discourse (problems of axiology and poetics). Ekaterinburg: Ural federal univ. publishing house, 2007: 49–71. (In Rus.) 13. Proskurina, V. Myths of the Empire: Literature and Power in the Age of Catherine II. M: New Literary Review, 2017. (In Rus.) 14. Rudneva, O. N. Poetic individuality of M. M. Kheraskov: philosophical and aestetic searches: cand. phil. sci. diss. Lipezk, 2003. (In Rus.) 15. Baehr, S. L. The Paradise Myth in the Eighteenth Century Russia: Utopian Patterns in Early Secular Russian Literature and Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991. (In Engl.) 16. Wortman Richard S. Scenarios of Power. Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy. Vol. 1. From Peter the Great to the Death of Nicolas I. Princeton University Press, 1995. (In Engl.) Sources 17. Lopukhin, I. V. Masonic works: Spiritual knight. Some musings on the inner Church. M: New Acropolis, 2013. (In Rus.) 18. Saint-Martin, L. C. On delusions and the truth [web resource] M: I. Lopuchin’s free typography, 1785. Web. 22.11.2019. http://www.martinist.ru/pdf/lui-klod-de-sen-merten-o-zablujdeniyah.pdf (In Rus.) 19. Kheraskov, M. M. The works of M. Kheraskov: corrected and complete. Vol. II. Vladimir, epic poem. M: Univ. typography C. Ridger and C. Claudis, 1796. (In Rus.) 20. Kheraskov, M. M. Rossiada, epic poem. M: Ponomarev’s Free typography, 1807. (In Rus.) 21. Kheraskov, M. M. Tsar, or Novgorod Saved. M: Univ. typography C. Ridger and C. Claudis, 1800. (In Rus.)
Full articleConcept of Power in M. Kheraskov’s Epic Poems through the Lens of Masonic Worldview (L. K. de Saint-Martin, I. V. Lopukhin)
0
35