Article
Article name	Right to Privacy in Liberal Philosophy of the Modern Era
Authors	Chesnokova L.V. Candidate of Philosophy,
Bibliographic description	Chesnokova L. V. Right to Privacy in Liberal Philosophy of the Modern Era // Humanitarian Vector. 2020. Vol. 15, No. 2. PP. 33–42. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-2-33-42.
Section	CULTURE AND SOCIETY
UDK	130.2
DOI	10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-2-33-42
Article type
Annotation	The article discusses the problem of the right to privacy, which was first themed in the philosophy of the modern era which raised the issues of human rights and freedoms, private property, the nature of relations between an individual, society and the state which have not lost their relevance in our time. The study is based on an integrated approach which includes logical, hermeneutic and comparative methods. We show how the right to privacy is substantiated in liberal theories starting from T. Hobbes, who believed that in exchange for protection the individual should transfer his rights and freedoms to the state. However, at the same time he remains a certain area where the state does not intervene, namely faith and personal beliefs. According to the theory of J. Locke, inalienable human rights include the right to life, liberty, and property which, as a result of labor, turns from the general into the private. The state is needed in order to protect the individual and his property from illegal encroachments. In the philosophical concept of I. Kant, the individual has dignity, because it represents all of humanity. A man, a master to himself, has the ability to make decisions independently and bear responsibility for them. According to J. Mill, a person can independently choose a lifestyle, since he knows better than others what is good for him and is not obliged to give an account of his actions to others. The study concludes that liberalism is a philosophical basis for the justification of the right to privacy, which includes the right to autonomy of the individual, private property and protection from state interference, if the actions of the individual do no harm to anyone.
Key words	liberal philosophy, privacy, publicity, T. Hobbes, J. Locke, J. Mill
Article information
References	1. Hobbes, Th. Leviathan, or matter, form and power of the state of the church and civil. Collected works. In 2 v. V. 2. M: Mysl’, 1991. (In Rus.) 2. Hobbes, Th. About a citizen. Collected works. In 2 v. V. 1. M: Mysl’, 1989. (In Rus.) 3. Gornova, G. V. The Urban Origins of Democracy and Liberalism. Vestnik of OmGPU. Humanitarian Studies, no 4, pp. 12–14, 2017. (In Rus.) 4. Kant, I. Metaphysics of morals. Collected works. In 6 v. V. 4. P. 2. M: Mysl’, 1965. (In Rus.) 5. Kant, I. Answering the Question: What Is Enlightenment? Collected works. In 8 v. V. 8. M: Mysl’, 1994. (In Rus.) 6. Locke, J. Two treatises on the board. Collected works. In 3 v. V. 3. M: Mysl`, 1988. (In Rus.) 7. Locke, J. Experience on toleration. Collected works. In 3 v. V. 3. M: Mysl`, 1988. (In Rus.) 8. Mill, J. About freedom. Anthology of world liberal thought (1st half of the 19th century). M: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. (In Rus.) 9. Chesnokova, L. V. The right to privacy as a necessary aspect of human dignity. Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice, no. 6, pp. 196–199, 2017. (In Rus.) 10. Chesnokova, L. V. Privacy, boredom and gender relations in the modern era. News of the Ural Federal University. Series 3. Social Sciences, no. 2, pp. 164–176, 2019. (In Rus.) 11. Bloustein, E. I. Privacy as an aspect of human dignity. An Answer to Dean Prosser. Philosophical Dimensions for Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by F. D. Schoeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 156–202. (In Engl.) 12. Bratu, C., Dittnezer, M. Theorien des Liberalismus zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius. 2017. (In Germ.) 13. Habermas, J. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Fr. а. M: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2015. (In Germ.) 14. McStay, A. Privacy and Philosophy. New York: Peter Lang, 2014. (In Engl.) 15. Prentki, J. V. Die anthopologische Funktion der Privatheit. Norderstedt: GRIN, 2016. (In Germ.) 16. Reiman, J. Privacy, Intimacy and Personhood. Philosophical Dimensions for Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by F. D. Schoeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 300–317. (In Engl.) 17. Rössler, B. Der Wert des Privaten. Fr. a. M: Suhrkamp, 2001. (In Germ.) 18. Werner, P. Autonomie, Privatheit und Selbstbestimmung. Norderstedt: Grin Verlag, 2006. (In Germ.)
Full article	Right to Privacy in Liberal Philosophy of the Modern Era
	0
	19