Article
Article name The Culture of “New” Europe in the Work of M. Houellebecq: A Deserted House?
Authors Koroliov A.A. Postgraduate Student, mailhomekorolev@yandex.ru
Bibliographic description Koroliov A. A. The Culture of “New” Europe in the Work of M. Houellebecq: A Deserted House? // Humanitarian Vector. 2020. Vol. 15, No. 4. PP. 89–96. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-4-89-96.
Section AXIOLOGY OF CULTURE
UDK 008
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-4-89-96
Article type
Annotation The relevance of studying the value transformations of modern Europe is closely related to the conceptualization of the notions, representing the dynamic of change. They include the concept of the so-called “European house” based on the presumed cultural integrity of European countries. The material of the study was the body of works by the famous French writer Michel Houellebecq, whose works reveal the contradictions of the nature of sociocultural identity of the modern European. The novelty of the research is to identify the specific features of common perception of house as a meaningful cultural symbol. The research methodology is a culturological analysis that combines the principles of axiological and anthropological approaches with hermeneutics. Common European values are the result of a long evolution of society and social identity, a gradual change in the social and political forms of organization of its life. An important component of this process is not only rational understanding but also personal experience of ongoing sociocultural “shifts” and mutations. A vivid example that captures such experience can be found in the works of writers who have addressed the topic of European identity. M. Houellebecq has a special place among them since his creative expressions, unflattering and provoking, create publicity that can be compared only to Houellebeqc’s popularity. In the picture of the world created by Houellebeqc, Europe is depicted through the metaphor of the house. Its connotations are symbolic in themselves: void (the house is too big and empty), isolated (remote), deserted (inhabited by strangers) and abandoned (constantly in need of repair). The topic of European bureaucracy symbolically revealed through a lifeless metropolis struggling with a dying countryside (that thus proves that it is alive) deserves special attention.
Key words culture of “new” Europe, European house, cultural symbol, everyday culture, sociocultural identity
Article information
References 1. Badiou, A. Handbook of Inaesthetics. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2014. (In Rus.) 2. Borovkov, I. I. [et al.]. Transformation of the party-political landscape in Europe in the new world order. Problems of national strategy, no. 4, pp. 13–57, 2019. (In Rus.) 3. Branitsky, A. G. The relationship of modern Russia with the EU and the Council of Europe: the fate of Russian Europeanism. In Kornilov, A. A., ed.: World Regions: problems of history, culture and politics. Nizhny Novgorod, 2018: 6–11. (In Rus.) 4. Bushev, A. B. Media Studies of the Discourse of European Identity. Text Interpretation: Linguistic, Literary and Methodological Aspects, no. 6, pp. 95–100, 2013. (In Rus.) 5. Wachshtain, V. “Practice” vs. “Frame”: alternative research projects of the everyday world. Sociological Review, no. 1, pp. 65–95, 2008. (In Rus.) 6. Volkov, V. N. Postmodernity: distrust by metanarrative. Cultural Heritage of Russia, no. 2, pp. 3–11, 2015. (In Rus.) 7. Gavrilova, S. M. The “political alternative” and the future of Europe. Bulletin of the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Ministry. Russia and the World, no. 4, pp. 203–217, 2019. (In Rus.) 8. Giddens, A. Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. M: Ves’ mir, 2004. (In Rus.) 9. Gorokhov, P. A., Yuzhaninova, E. R. Treatise of Immanuel Kant “Perpetual Peace”: the possibility of project implementation. Theory and Practice of Social Development, no. 11, pp. 188–190, 2015. (In Rus.) 10. Gulyaeva, K. V. Discourse on the essence of the integration process in the European Union: “Euro-optimists” versus “Euro-skeptics”. Power, no. 5, pp. 64–67, 2010. (In Rus.) 11. Zharikov, P. A. European values: achievements and consequences. In: Proceedings of the Conference “Axiological aspect of training students of a technical university”. 2016: 20–28. (In Rus.) 12. Zaripova, A. I. The role of the media of France in the space of modern culture. In Alyaeva G. E., Masloboeva O. D., ed.: Creativity as a national element: media and social activity. Digest of articles. Sankt-Peterburg, 2018: 358–366. (In Rus.) 13. Ivanov, I. D. Anatomy of European values. Modern Europe, no. 2, pp. 13–23, 2012. (In Rus.) 14. Kant, I. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. Collected works. In 8 v. V. 7. M: Choro, 1994: 5–56. (In Rus.) 15. Kasabutskaya, M. S. Glocalization and features of intercultural interaction. Proc. of St. Petersburg State Institute of Culture, vol. 206, pp. 205–212, 2015. (In Rus.) 16. Kovalev, A. A., Shamakhov, V. A. Opposition “Peace-War” as a phenomenon of hybrid political reality. Politics and Society, no. 7, pp. 25–39, 2018. (In Rus.) 17. Kretsu, O. G. The formation of “Europe” as a new historical and cultural community in the early Middle Ages. In Grigoryev D. V., executive ed.: Socio-political processes in the history of world civilizations. Proceedings of the 3rd All-Russian Conference of the Department of World History. V. P. Astafiev Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University, 2018: 117–130. (In Rus.) 18. Lopatin, A. A., Chechulin, V. L. Research of the tendency of state of the economy of the European union using model deviation from economic balance. In Shkaraputa A. P., editor-in-chief: Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Research – 2017. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference of Young Scientists with International Participation. In 2 vol. Vol. 2. 2017: 225–229. (In Rus.) 19. Lutsenko, A. V. “Neopagan complex” in the mind of the modern European. Ethnosocium and multinational culture, no. 6, pp. 35–39, 2012. (In Rus.) 20. Mal’tseva, E. A. Artistic image as a result of reality reflection and construction. Observatory of Culture, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2020. (In Rus.) 21. Medushevsky, N. A. Memory Policy in the European Union as a Tool for the Implementation of the Integration Process. Power, no. 3, pp. 167–174, 2019. (In Rus.) 22. Nekhorosheva, K. I. The problem of humanitarian technologies: specificity of the approach of French education. Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Philosophy, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2019. (In Rus.) 23. Perskaya, V. V. European values or national interests? In: Economic aspects of Brexit. Series “Reports of the Institute of Europe”. M: Institut Evropy RAN, 2017: 89–98. (In Rus.) 24. Podoroga, V. A. What is being asked when one asks about what is philosophy. Philosophical journal, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 2009. (In Rus.) 25. Salikov, A. N. Interpretation of the ideas of the treatise “Perpetual Peace” by I. Kant in the modern liberal theory of the democratic world. Kant collection, no. 4, pp. 42–49, 2012. (In Rus.) 26. Serebryakova, S. V. Scientific reflection of “European identity” phenomenon in present-day general European context. Humanitarian and legal studies, no. 1, pp. 213–218, 2017. (In Rus.) 27. Tishina, I. N. Europeanism of Turgenev in the assessment of cultural workers of the Russian emigration of the first wave. Culture and Civilization, no. 5A, pp. 502–511, 2017. (In Rus.) 28. Uznarodov, I. M. New nationalism in modern Europe. Modern Europe, no. 5, pp. 75–90, 2015. (In Rus.) 29. Houellebecq, M. The Map and the Territory. M: Astrel’; CORPUS, 2011. (In Rus.) 30. Houellebecq, M. Serotonin. M: Astrel’; CORPUS, 2020. (In Rus.) 31. The philosophy of culture in the system of studying international relations. Book 1. Paradoxes of a research prism / Silant’eva, M. V. [et al.]. M: MGIMO, 2020. (In Rus.) 32. Habermas, J. Discussion on the past and future of international law: transition from national to post-national structure. Bulletin of the Russian Philosophical Society, no. 3, p. 16, 2003. (In Rus.) 33. Shumilin, A. I. Pandemic Factor in European Foreign Policy. Scientific and Analytical Bulletin of the Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 2, pp. 14–21, 2020. (In Rus.) 34. Yakovlev, D. A. The concept of euroscepticism in social and political theory. Skif: Student Science Issues, no. 2, pp. 78–84, 2020. (In Rus.) 35. Lyotard, J.-F. The Postmodern condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnessota Press, 1984. (In Engl.) 36. Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In Jost, J. T. & Sidanius, J., ed.: Political psychology: Key readings. Series: Key readings in social psychology. New York: Psychology Press, 2004: 276–293. (In Engl.)
Full articleThe Culture of “New” Europe in the Work of M. Houellebecq: A Deserted House?
0
7