Article
Article name Beyond the Great Wall: Peculiarities of the Chinese National Character
Authors Bokavneva O.V. Degree Seeking Applicant, o.bokavneva@inno.mgimo.ru
Bibliographic description Bokavneva O. V. Beyond the Great Wall: Peculiarities of the Chinese National Character // Humanitarian Vector. 2020. Vol. 15, No. 4. PP. 137–142. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-4-137-142.
Section SEMANTICS OF THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE
UDK 130.2
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-4-137-142
Article type
Annotation Keen interest in studying of neighboring states has always remained a vital problem for several reasons: the protection of the state from invasions, the defense of independence and territorial integrity, the establishment of diplomatic contacts and trade relations, the development of cultural ties. Walled by the Great Wall, China developed and went its own way. Isolation from outside world, the harsh climate, the natural environment – all has affected the national character. Nowadays the consideration of value orientations, norms of behavior, system of education, understanding and appropriate application of accumulated knowledge in the process of intercultural contact continues to be an important problem, the solution of which is to explore Chinese society by overcoming the Great Wall. At first sight, the stability of Chinese culture is perceived as conservative. However, its paradoxicality is manifested in the ability to accept new trends, to reply the challenges of today, preserving the samples and norms, that have evolved and passed on to the next generation for centuries. Adherence to traditions can be seen in behavior, everyday life, interpersonal relationships, affects all spheres of society. The Chinese belong to another civilization, they have a different system of views, attitude to reality, a certain type of thinking, non-verbal means of communication, language picture of the world, humor. This article discusses the national traits of Chinese character in the context of the key provisions of philosophical and cultural analysis ‒ which can help to prevent conflict situations, avoid misunderstandings in communication
Key words national character, family, “saving face”, moral attitudes, traditions, succession, collectivity
Article information
References 1.Van Ian Ian. Traditions of family education in China. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, no. 43–2, pp. 54–57, 2007. (In Rus.) 2. Glagolev, V. S. Religious and ethnic filling of images of “one’s own” and “someone else’s” in the dynamics of political opportunism. Dialogue cultures and partnership of civilizations. XIV international Likhachevsky scientific readings. Proceedings of the Conference. Saint Petersburg: 15–20 May 2014: Sankt-Peterburgskii Gumanitarnyi universitet profsoiuzov, 2014: 362–365 (In Rus.) 3. Zheludova, N. F. Empathy in interpersonal and intergroup communication in contemporary society. Lawand Governance. 21st Century, no. 1, pp. 66–68, 2012. (In Rus.). 4. Maliavin, V. V. Chinese ethnos, or the gift of peace. Ivanovo, Roshcha, 2016. (In Rus.) 5. Medvedeva, S. M. National and cultural identity and a diplomat’s personality. Law and Governance. 21st Century, no. 4, pp. 32–34, 2011. (In Rus.) 6. Panfilova, T. V., Samarin, A. N., Zheludova, N. F. Social empathy in intercultural communication perspective. Konfliktologia, no. 4, pp. 262–281, 2016. (In Rus.) 7. Sidikhmenov, V.Ya. China: pages of the past. Smolensk, Rusich, 2010. (In Rus.) 8. Silant’eva, M. V. Communication as a Way to Broadcast an Intentional Experience of Local Cultures. Scientific research and development. Modern communication studies, no. 4, pp. 49–55, 2016. (In Rus.) 9. Silant’eva, M. V. Metamorphosis of Social Organisms in Light of Transformation of Cultural Boundaries: Global Consequences of Modernization Processes. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 6, pp. 206– 210, 2012. (In Rus.) 10. Silant’eva, M. V., Glagolev, V. S., Tarasov, B. N. Philosophy of crosscultural communication. International Trends, no. 2, pp. 64–76, 2017. (In Rus.) 11. Speshnev, N. A. The Chinese: features of national psychology. Saint Petersburg, KARO, 2014. (In Rus.) 12. Sukhomlinova, V. V. Alternative collectivism: inner characteristics of the traditional Chinese society. Manuscript, no. 9, pp. 93–99, 2018. (In Rus.). 13. Tan Aoshuan. Chinese picture of the world: the language, the culture, the mentality. Moscow, Jazyki slavjanskoj kultury, 2004. (In Rus.) 14. Aneas, María Assumpta, Sandín, María Paz Intercultural and Cross-Cultural Communication Research: Some Reflections about Culture and Qualitative Methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, no. 10, art. 51, 2009. Web. 30.04.2020 http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1251. DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.17169/fqs-10.1.1251 (In Engl.) 15. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., Minkov, M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: McGraw Hill, 2010. (In Engl.) 16. Nangyeon Lim Cultural differences in emotion: differences in emotional arousal level between the East and the West // Integrative Medicine Research, no. 5, pp. 105–109, 2016. DOI 10.1016 /j.imr.2016.03.004 (In Engl.) 17. Teodorescu, A. Intercultural communication patterns and language use in computer mediatedcommunication. Studii si Cercetari Filologice: Seria Limbi Straine Aplicate, no. 11, pp. 247–253, 2012. (In Engl.) 18. Yi Wang, Su Lu, Jia Liu, Jiahui Tan, Juyuan Zhang The Influence of Culture on Attitudes Towards Humorous Advertising. Frontiers in Psychology, no. 10, pp. 1–12, 2019. DOI 10.3389 /fpsyg.2019.01015 (In Engl.)
Full articleBeyond the Great Wall: Peculiarities of the Chinese National Character
0
6