Article
Article name The Question of Androids in the Sphere of Human Practices: Digital Colonialism or Harmony?
Authors Samoilova E.O. Postgraduate Student, Lecturer of the Department of Innovation, Marketing and Advertising, blu_sky_angel@mail.ru
Shaev Y.M. Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor, existentia20065@yandex.ru
Bibliographic description Samoilova E. O., Shaev Yu. M. The Question of Androids in the Sphere of Human Practices: Digital Colonialism or Harmony? // Humanitarian Vector. 2020. Vol. 15, No. 4. PP. 172–179. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-4-172-179.
Section PHILOSOPHY OF THINKING AND COGNITION
UDK 101.1
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-4-172-179
Article type
Annotation The paper studies the artificial intelligence, the presence of robots, including anthropomorphic androids, endowed with artificial intelligence and using neuro-algorithms in the practices of modern man. The authors analyze the technology of the Internet of things, artificial intelligence in various spheres of modern life ‒ production, education, agriculture, public service and everyday practices. The authors study the problems of android: corporal ‒ aspects of the anthropomorphic appearance and “rational” ‒ possibilities and limitations of consciousness and reflection. The authors research the question of androids’ appearance. They study the question of perception of androids, especially if they look like humans and the features of the phenomenology of the android body. In this regard, the authors highlight the problem of “digital colonialism” ‒ a human consideration of technologies including androids in a utilitarian sense in the context of instrumental rationality. Despite the fact that in the nearest future androids will have characteristics that are almost indistinguishable from humans, and androids’ intellect is in many respects comparable to human ones, a man fails to “see” in robots a full-fledged “subject” or the Other. Phenomenological problem of gender, in relation to the image of the android, remains one of the acute topics, which is rarely discussed. Finally, the authors make assumptions about the place of androids in human and human-machine interactions. They discuss the idea of digital everyday life and the need to build harmonious relationships with the world of technical devices in the future.
Key words androids, transhumanism, information technologies, philosophy of technology, semiotics, the Internet of Things
Article information
References 1. Ashton, K. That “Internet of Things” Thing. In the real world, things matter more than ideas // RFID Journal, 2009. Web. 17.02.2020. www.rfidjournal.com/article/ print/4986 (In Engl.) 2. Clark, B. Facebook’s AI accidentally created its own language. Web. 14.01.2020. https://thenextweb.com/artificial-intelligence/2017/06/19/facebooks-ai-accidentally-created-its-own-language/#.tnw_TUkbtKJt (In Engl.) 3. Guizzo, E. Invasion of the Robot Babies. Web. 14.01.2020. https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/invasion-of-the-robot-babies-infographic (In Engl.) 4. Habermas, U. The future of human nature. Oxford: Polity Press, 2003. (In Engl.) 5. Habermas, U. Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1. Boston: Mass Beacon Press, 1984. (In Engl.) 6. Heerink, M. Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. International journal of social robotics, no.4, pp.361-375, 2010.(In Engl.) 7. How Kaspar the robot is helping autistic students to socialize. Web. 15.02.2020. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-05/the-creepy-looking-robot-teaching-kids-social-skills/9832530 (In Engl.) 8. Klamer, T., Allouch, S. B. Acceptance and use of a zoomorphic robot in a domestic setting. Web. 14.02.2020. https://www.utwente.nl/nl/bms/com/bestanden/2.pdf (In Engl.) 9. Kranenburg, van. R. The Internet of Things: A Critique of Ambient Technology and the All-Seeing Network of RFID. Pijnacker: Telstar Media, 2008. (In Engl.) 10. Liu, Y. The Accountability of AI. Case Study: Microsoft’s Tay Experiment. Web. 17.02.2020. https://chatbotslife.com/the-accountability-of-ai-case-study-microsofts-tay-experiment-ad577015181f (In Engl.) 11. McCarthy, J. Recursive Functions of Symbolic Expressions and Their Computation by Machine. Part I. Communications of the ACM, no.4, pp.184-195, 1960. (In Engl.) 12. Mori, M. The Uncanny Valley. Energy, no.7, pp.33-35, 1970. (In Engl.) 13. Norman. World’s first psychopath AI. Web. 14.02.2020. http://norman-ai.mit.edu/#inkblot (In Engl.) 14. One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100) Web. 14.02.2020. https://ai100.stanford.edu (In Engl.) 15. Robot teacher conducts first class in Tokyo school. Web. 14.02.2020. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/5311151/Robot-teacher-conducts-first-class-in-Tokyo-school.html (In Engl.) 16. Russell E. SMILE: A Portable Humanoid Robot Emotion Interface. 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Workshop on Applications for Emotional Robots, HRI14, Bielefeld University, Germany, 2014. (In Engl.) 17. SAFFiR, the US Navy’s robot conducted its first tests. Web. 14.02.2020. http://www.4erevolution.com/en/robot-saffir-navy/ (In Engl.) 18. Twitter taught Microsoft’s AI chatbot to be a racist in less than a day. Web. 14.02.2020. https://www.theverge.com/2016/3/24/11297050/tay-microsoft-chatbot-racist (In Engl.)
Full articleThe Question of Androids in the Sphere of Human Practices: Digital Colonialism or Harmony?
0
0