| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Land Along the Argun River: Territorial Differentiation of Information Space (Based on Russian Dialectal Lexicography and Place Names) |
| Authors | Sokolova A.A. Doctor of Geography, falcones@list.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Sokolova A. A. Land Along the Argun River: Territorial Differentiation of Information Space (Based on Russian Dialectal Lexicography and Place Names) // Humanitarian Vector. 2017. Vol. 12, No. 1. PP. 161–169. DOI 10/21209/1996-7853-2017-12-1-161-169. |
| Section | HUMAN GEOGRAPHY AND PHILOSOPHY OF TRANSBOUNDEDNESS |
| UDK | 81’373.21 |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2017-12-1-161-169 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article is devoted to folk geographical terminology and toponyms in the Russian patois. The object of the research is the land along the Argun River (Argun River valley and surrounding areas). The methodological basis of investigation is an integrated approach to the study of the territory and information, methods of geography and lingogeoiconics that is close to еthnophysiography. The systematization of the linguistic material is based on a comprehensive analysis of physical-geographical, ethno-cultural and socio-economic features of the study area. The geographical basis for constructing a terminology system is the geomorphologic framework of the region and geographical latitudinal zones. The terminology includes the names of the landforms of the River valley, deformations of the river bed, vegetation and certain types of plants, names of places suitable and unsuitable for the placement of settlements, croplands, hayfields and pastures. The geographical analysis of folk terminology helped to create an information scheme for the differentiation of the region. Language data have allowed us to identify three segments. The segment of the steppe zone (Argun urman) and the segment of the taiga zone (Argun zakamna) are poorly developed. The segment of the forest-steppe zone (Argun altan) acts as the center of the territory development and information concentration.The practical value of this research is connected with the development prospects of ecological and ethnic tourism. Folk geographical terms and place names are an important part of the tourist information. |
| Key words | geospace, information space, traditional land use, Russian folk geographical terminology, toponymy, landscape perception, Transbaikalia, Argun River |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Aleksandrov V. Argun’ i Priargun’e. Putevye zametki i ocherki [Elektronnyi resurs] // Vestn. Evropy. 1904. № 9. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.drevlit.ru/docs/kitay/XX/1900–1920/Aleksandrov_V/text1.php. (data obrashcheniya: 19.10.2016). 2. Berezovich E. L. Russkaya toponimiya v etnolingvisticheskom aspekte: prostranstvo i chelovek. M.: Librokom, 2009. 318 s. 3. Geomorfologicheskoe raionirovanie // Natsional’nyi atlas Rossii: v 4 t. T. 2. M.: AST, 2008. 496 s. 4. Gerd A. S. Vvedenie v etnolingvistiku: kurs lektsii i khrestomatiya. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU, 2005. 457 s. 5. Zhekulin V. S. Istoricheskaya geografiya: predmet i metody. L.: Nauka, 1982. 224 s. 6. Zavadskii A. S., Ivanov V. V., Chernov A. V. Morfologiya i gorizontal’nye deformatsii rusel pogranichnykh rek basseina Amura [Elektronnyi resurs] // Eroziya pochv i ruslovye protsessy. 2012. Vyp. 18. S. 241–268. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.makkaveev-lab.narod.ru/SEFP18–4.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.10.2016). 7. Kalutskov V. N. Landshaft v kul’turnoi geografii. M.: Novyi khronograf, 2008. 320 s. 8. Kolbovskii E.Yu. Landshaftovedenie. M.: Akademiya, 2006. 478 s. 9. Novikov A. N. Prigranichnoe polozhenie Zabaikal’skogo kraya v transgranichnom trekhzvennom regione: rol’ v territorial’noi organizatsii naseleniya i khozyaistva. Chita: ZabGU, 2015. 94 s. 10. Novikova M. S. Ekonomiko-geograficheskie osobennosti osvoeniya yugo-vostochnykh raionov Zabaikal’skogo kraya. Novosibirsk: Geo, 2014. 161 s. 11. Peshkova G. A. Daurskaya lesostep’ (sostav, osobennosti, genezis). Barnaul: ARTHKA, 2010. 12. Rodoman B. B. Geografiya, raionirovanie, kartoidy: sb. nauch. tr. Smolensk: Oikumena, 2007. 368 s. 13. Sokolova A. A. Leksiko-geograficheskii metod izucheniya landshafta: avtoref. dis. … kand. geogr. nauk. SPb., 1996. 21 s. 14. Sokolova A. A. Landshaft i ego imya v krest’yanskoi kul’ture: pravilo sootvetstviya // Vestn. Voronezhskogo otdela Rus. geogr. o-va. 2001. T. 3. S. 22–24. 15. Sokolova A. A. Dvinskii Sever kak ob”ekt lingvogeoikoniki (organizatsiya prostranstva po vertikali «voda – zemlya – nebo») // Gumanitarnaya geogr. M.: In-t naslediya, 2005. Vyp. 2. S. 90–112. 16. Sokolova A. A. Folk-geografiya Zabaikal’ya: opyt kross-kul’turnogo analiza nauchnykh i narodnykh predstavlenii o landshaftakh regiona. Saarbrücken: LAP, 2011. 301 s. 17. Sokolova A. A. Geoprostranstvo v traditsionnoi i sovremennoi kul’ture (rossiiskii kontekst): avtoref. dis. … d-ra geogr. nauk: 25.00.24. SPb., 2013. 49 s. 18. Tolstoi N. I. Slavyanskaya geograficheskaya terminologiya. Semasiologicheskie etyudy. M.: Nauka, 1969. 262 s. 19. Duvall S. S. “Landˮ and life Ethnoecology and ethnogeography as complementary approaches to the anal-yses of landscape perception // Landscape in language: transdisciplinary perspectives (Culture and Language Use. Vol. 4). Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co, 2011. P. 121–142. 20. Turk A. G., Mark D. M., Stea D. Ethnophysiography // Landscape in language: transdisciplinary perspectives (Culture and Language Use. Vol. 4). Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co, 2011. P. 25–46. 21. Turk A. G., Mark D. M. Perspectives on the ethical conduct of landscape in language research // Landscape in language: transdisciplinary perspectives (Culture and Language Use. Vol. 4). Philadelphia; Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co, 2011. P. 411–434. |
| Full article | Land Along the Argun River: Territorial Differentiation of Information Space (Based on Russian Dialectal Lexicography and Place Names) |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
