Article
Article name Implementation of the Macroconcept Human Being Cognitive Signs in Ch. T. Aitmatov`s Works
Authors Pimenova M.V. Doctor of Philology, Professor, Rector, MVPimenova@yandex.ru
Alaeva S.A. Senior Lecturer, ala-sagyn@yandex.ru
Bibliographic description Pimenova M. V., Alaeva S. A. Implementation of the Macroconcept Human Being Cognitive Signs in Ch. T. Aitmatov`s Works // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 1. PP. 73–80. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-1-73-80.
Section THE GLASS BEAD GAME: HIDDEN MEANINGS OF THE TEXT
UDK 81`27
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-1-73-80
Article type
Annotation The article discusses the conceptual signs of the human being macroconcept. The conceptual signs of the human being macroconcept are determined on the basis of the modern Russian language explanatory dictionaries. Man in the perception of Ch. T. Aitmatov is described on the material of his famous works. According to the results of the study, the most frequent signs of the human being macroconcept are recognized as “boy”, “son”, “mother”, “woman”, “father”, “man”, “grandmother”, “wife”, “girl/girl”, “bride”, ”mother in law”. Based on the data obtained, 13 conceptual features were stated out: 1) “living being”; 2) “thinking creature”; 3) “talking creature”; 4) “creative creature”; 5) “working being”; 6) “face with character”; 7) “social being”; 8) “people”; 9) “personality (with special moral qualities)”; 10) “personality (with special intellectual properties)”; 11) “someone/someone/someone/nobody/everyone”. The conceptual signs of the HUMAN BEING macroconcept in Russian linguistic culture were revealed, which showed, on the one hand, their variability in the texts of Ch. T. Aitmatov in the course of the research. On the other hand, it is the conceptual signs that constitute the dominant self-reflection of the author of the analyzed works. The studied works of the author show that the topic of a person is a key one for C. T. Aitmatov.
Key words cultural linguistics; language picture of the world, concept, motivating signs, macroconcept human being
Article information
References 1. Vinogradov, V. V. History of words. Russian Academy of Sciences. Department of Literature and Language: Scientific Council “Russian language: history and modern state”. Institute of Russian Language, Russian Academy of Sciences. Shvedova, N. Yu., Ed. M: Tolk, 1994. (In Rus.) 2. Humboldt, V. von. Selected Works on Linguistics. M: Progress, 1984. (In Rus.) 3. Kornilov, O. A. Language pictures of the world as derivatives of national mentalities. M: 2014. (In Rus.) 4. Pimenova, M. V. Ethnohermeneutik of naive language picture of the man`s inner world: monograph. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzuzdat; Landau: Verlag Empirische Pedagogik, 1999. (A series of “Ethnortorics and Ethnogmeneutics.” Vol. 5). (In Rus.) 5. Pimenova, M. V. The semantics of linguistic mentality and implication. Philological sciences, no. 4, pp. 80–86, 1999. (In Rus.) 6. Pimenova, M. V. Methodology of conceptual research. Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University. Series of Philology, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 100–105, 2002. (In Rus.) 7. Pimenova, M. V. Soul and spirit: signs of conceptualization. Kemerovo: Graphics, 2004. (A series of “Conceptual Studies.” Vol. 3). (In Rus.) 8. Pimenova, M. V. Symbols of culture and ways of conceptualizing the inner world of a person (conceptual metaphor of the house). In: Concept. Form. Notion Symbol: to the 70th anniversary of prof. V. V. Kolesov: collective monograph. Pimenovа, M. V., ed. Kemerovo: Graphics, 2004: 35–60. (In Rus.) 9. Pimenova, M. V. Concept heart: image, concept, symbol: monograph. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2007. (Series “Conceptual Studies.” Vol. 9). (In Rus.) 10. Pimenova, M. V. Method of describing conceptual structures (using the example of the concept of HOPE). Uchenye zapiski Zabaykalsky State Humanitarian-Pedagogical University. N. G. Chernyshevsky, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 85–94, 2011. (In Rus.) 11. Pimenova, M. V. Conceptual studies and national mentality. Humanitarian vector, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 126–132, 2011. (In Rus.) 12. Pimenova, M. V. Types of concepts and stages of conceptual research. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 127–131. (In Rus.) 13. Pimenova, M. V. Conceptology at the present stage (methods of research of conceptual structures). Humanitarian vector, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 13–22, 2017. (In Rus.) 14. Potebnya, A. A. Thought and language. Word and myth. M: Pravda, 1989: 17–200. (In Rus.) 15. Sapir, E. Selected Works on Linguistics and Cultural Studies: Trans. from English. Kibrik, А., ed. M: Publishing group «Progress», «Univers», 1993. (In Rus.) Sources 16. Big Encyclopedic Dictionary. Web. 11.12.2018. https://www.dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc3p/323018. (In Rus.) 17. Vorobiev, V. V. Linguoculturology: Theory and Methods. M: RUDN, 1997. (In Rus.) 18. Efremova, T. F. New dictionary of the Russian language. Interpretive word-formation. Electronic version. Web. 11.12.2018. https://www.efremova.info/word/chelovek.html#.W-5TljgzbIU. (In Rus.) 19. Small academic dictionary of the Russian language. Web. 11.12.2018. https://www.classes.ru/all-russian/dictionary-russian-academ-term-87834.html. (In Rus.) 20. Maslova, V. A. Introduction to linguoculturology. M: Heritage, 1997. 2007. (In Rus.) 21. Maslova, V. A., Pimenova, M. V. Codes linguoculture. M: Flintа, Science, 2016. (In Rus.) 22. Semenov, A. V. Etymological dictionary of the Russian language. Russian language from A to Ya. M: Publishing house , 2003. Web. 11.12.2018. http://www.evartist.narod.ru/text15/001.html. (In Rus.) 23. The S. I. Ozhegov`s explanatory dictionary online. Web. 16.11.2018. https://www.slovarozhegova.ru/word.php?wordid=34967. (In Rus.) 24. Dictionary of the Russian language; edited by D. N. Ushakov. M: State. In-t “Sov. Entsikl.”; OGIZ; State publishing house of foreign and nat. words., 1935–1940. (In Rus.)
Full articleImplementation of the Macroconcept Human Being Cognitive Signs in Ch. T. Aitmatov`s Works
0
34