Article
Article name Socio-Philosophical Approaches and their Use in the “Criminal Geography”
Authors Martynov V.L.Doctor of Geography, Professor martin-vas@yandex.ru
Sazonova I.Y.Candidate of Geography, Associate Professor iesazonova@mail.ru
Bibliographic description Martynov V. L., Sazonova I. Ye. Socio-Philosophical Approaches and their Use in the “Criminal Geography” // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 2. PP. 134–143. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-2-134-143.
Heading HUMAN GEOGRAPHY AND PHILOSOPHY OF TRANSBOUNDEDNESS
UDC 17.021.3; 911.9
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-2-134-143
Article type
Annotation Social philosophy and socio-economic geography have a lot in common. However, social philosophy uses mainly temporal approaches to the research and socio-economic geography – spatial ones. One of the areas of socio-geographical research where socio-philosophical approaches can be very useful is “criminal geography”. In post-Soviet Russia, organized criminal groups with “geographical” names originating mainly from the so-called “industrial villages” became more famous. These criminal groups include “gang” crime, for which economic activity was crucial. In Soviet times, a “thief” crime was formed which had an “international” character. “Thieves” created a “parallel society” based on the denial of the values inherent in most of the society. “Thief” crime is most widespread in poor regions with a large number of correctional facilities. Street crime which is characteristic of poor regions and poor areas of large cities also has a social character. Political crime is a criminal offense hiding behind beautiful slogans (political, religious, national). However, the main reason for political crime is the struggle for natural resources. In the prevention and control of crime, one should take into account the spatial characteristics and history of the formation of criminal communities within a certain territory.
Key words social philosophy, socio-economic geography, “criminal geography”, criminal communities, street crime, political crime, regional differences
Article information
References 1. Averkieva, K. V. Territorial organization of correctional institutions of Russia. Izvestiya Rossijskoj Akademii nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, no. 3, pp. 19–34, 2014. (In Rus.) 2. Anikin, D. A. Topology of social space: from geography to social philosophy. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Ser. Filosofiya. Psixologiya. Pedagogika, no.1, vol.1, pp. 8, 2014. (In Rus.) 3. Antonyan, Yu. M. Criminology of the future: interdisciplinary scientific relations. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravooxranitel`naya praktika, no. 4, vol. 30, pp. 67–75, 2014. (In Rus.) 4. Badov, A. D. The geography of crime in Russia in the post-Soviet period. Dr. sci. geogr. diss. abstr. Krasnodar: KubGU, 2009. (In Rus.) 5. Vedernikova, O. N. The criminal situation in Russia in the light of global trends. Rossijskij kriminologicheskij vzglyad, no. 2, pp. 347–354, 2009. (In Rus.) 6. Gasanov, S. S. Social roots of crime in the North Caucasus. Cand. of philosophical sci. diss. abstr. Krasnodar: Krasnodarskij universitet MVD RF, 2014. (In Rus.) 7. Gromov, V. G. Russian criminal subculture: philosophical aspect. Teologiya. Filosofiya. Pravo, no. 2, pp. 44–57, 2017. (In Rus.) 8. Druzinin, A. G. Development of Russian human geography: trends, problem situations, priorities. Baltijskij region, no.2, pp.127–140, 2015. (In Rus.) 9. Kelle, V. Zh. Social philosophy: Actual problems. Filosofiya i obshhestvo, no. 1, vol. 42, pp. 5–18, 2006. (In Rus.) 10. Kemerov, V. E. Positions and ways of modern social philosophy. Logos et Praxis, no. 2, pp. 28–34, 2011. (In Rus.) 11. Martynov, V. L. Russian socio-economic geography: current state, main problems and prospects of development. Baltijskij region, no. 2, pp. 109–126, 2015. (In Rus.) 12. Martynov, V. L, Sazonova, I. Ye. Regional development of the North-West. Unasledovanny`e social`no-e`konomicheskie struktury` i perexod k postindustrial`nomu obshhestvu. Moscow: IG RAN. 2007: 287–300. (In Rus.) 13. Romashov, R. A. Crime and criminality as subject areas of philosophical and legal analysis. Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal, no. 3, vol. 41, pp. 255–263, 2015. (In Rus.) 14. Sikach, K. Yu. Geographical factors of the dynamics of crime in Ukraine in 1990 – 2012 years. Cand. geogr. sci. diss. abstr. Moscow: IG RAN, 2017. (In Rus.) 15. Sulimov, S. I., Cherenkov, R. A. Umbanda and palmaris: anti-system in Brazil. Manuskript, no. 8, vol. 94, pp. 86–92, 2018. DOI: 10.30853/manuscript.2018–8.19. (In Rus.) 16. Harries Keith D. The Geography of American Crime 1968. Journal of Geography, no. 4, vol. 70, pp. 204–213, 1971. DOI: 10.1080/00221347108981621. 17. Herbert, D. T. Geography of Urban Crime. N. Y. : Longman Inc. 1982. 18. Lowman, J. Conceptual Issues in the Geography of Crime: Toward a Geography of Social Control. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, no.1, vol. 76, pp. 81–94, 1986. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–8306.1986.tb00105.x.
Full articleSocio-Philosophical Approaches and their Use in the “Criminal Geography”