| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | National Cultural Myth in Contemporary Transcendence: the Philosophical Analysis |
| Authors | Silantieva M.V. Doctor of Philosophy, kfmgimo@gmail.com |
| Bibliographic description | Silant’eva M. V. National Cultural Myth in Contemporary Transcendence: the Philosophical Analysis // Humanitarian Vector. Series Philosophy. Cultural Studies. 2016. Vol. 11, No 2. P. 72–80. |
| Section | PHILOSOPHY AND CULTURE IN THE SPACE OF CONTEMPORARY CIVILIZATION |
| UDK | 130.2 |
| DOI | 10.21209/2307-1826-2016-11-2-72-80 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article analyzes some of the features of modern neomythology based on understanding of society as a space of national culture. Religious aspects of integrative mechanisms related to national culture are distinguished, their appearance in today’s social transcendence is described. An attempt was made to link the metaphysical conditions and socio-political contexts of the processes, identifying the real foundation of the mythological (primarily axiological and ideological) constructs that are operated within the latest discursive practices. Relying on the works of modern philosophy of religion and culture researchers, possible logical relations between certain concepts of the semantic field of “national-cultural mythology” were analyzed. Thus, the concepts of “new Slavophilism” and “neo – archaic” are considered from the opposite points of view, the concepts of “neo – slavophilism”, “neo-eurasism”, “neo-paganism”, “religious neo-modernism” associated with them are interpreted in terms of their logical intersection. Also the relationship of these concepts with the relevant phenomena of reality is underlined. There is the conclusion about the absence of identity between the “statist” interpretation of national mythologies and personalized interpretations, as well as the discrepancy of religious painted declarations of intent of certain social groups with their actual religious orientation. Based on “traditional values”, the new anthropological project is described in terms of the laws of its revitalization, as well as the capabilities and performance boundaries in the space of contemporary culture. |
| Key words | national cultural myth, national idea, new Slavophilism, neoslavophilism, new archaic, neo-paganism, traditional values, new anthropological project |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Arzumanov I. A. Kul’tur-konfessional’nyi faktor v protsessakh konsolidatsii sotsiopoliticheskogo prostranstva Baikal’skoi Sibiri // Izv. Irkut. gos. un-ta. Ser. Politologiya. Religiovedenie. 2009. № 1 (3). S. 244–251. 2. Bagdasaryan V. E. Servis i konsyumerizm: vyzov obshchestva neogranichennogo. 3. Potrebleniya // Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma. 2014. T. 8. № 2. S.10–18. 4. Bek U. Chto takoe globalizatsiya? M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001. 304 s. 5. Berdyaev N. A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka // Tsarstvo Dukha i Tsarstvo Kesarya / sost. i poslesl. P. V. Alekseeva. M.: Respublika, 1995. 375 s. 6. Bernyukevich T. V. O nekotorykh diskussionnykh voprosakh kontseptualizatsii i tipologicheskogo sravneniya kul’turnykh universalii v sovremennoi otechestvennoi filosofii // Uchen. zap. Zabaikal. gos. gum.-ped. un-ta im. N. G. Chernyshevskogo. Ser. Filosofiya. Kul’turologiya. Sotsial’naya rabota. Chita: ZabGGPU. 2009. № 4 (27). S. 6–11. 7. Bubnov Yu. A., Radugina O. A. Utilitarizm – dominanta tsennostnoi sistemy dvoryanstva [Elektronnyi resurs] // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. № 2–2. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=22463 (data obrashcheniya: 09.02.2016). 8. Bulgakov S. Filosofiya khozyaistva. M.: Terra-Knizhnyi klub, 2008. 352 s. 9. Goncharova S. V. Obraz cheloveka v religioznom neomodernizme // Filosofiya i kul’tura. 2009. № 4 (16). S. 10–18. 10. Glagolev V. S. Velichie Rossii: osnovaniya, illyuzii i realii // Filosofiya khozyaistva. 2006. № 1 (43). S. 101–106. 11. Glagolev V. S. Religiozno-etnicheskoe napolnenie obrazov «svoi» i «chuzhoi» v dinamike politicheskoi kon»yunkturnosti // V sb.: Dialog kul’tur i partnerstvo tsivilizatsii: XIV Mezhdunar. Likhachevskie nauch. chteniya. Ros. akad. nauk, Ros. akad. obraz., Kongress peterb. intelligentsii, Sankt-Peterb. gumanit. un-t profsoyuzov. SPb., 2014. S. 362–365. 12. Glagolev V. S., Silant’eva M. V. Religiozno-kul’turnoe prostranstvo Rossii: faktory dinamiki traditsii i traditsii dinamiki // Izv. Irkut. gos. un-ta. Ser.: Politologiya. Religiovedenie. 2010. № 2. S. 131–140. 13. Zhukov A. V. Formirovanie religiozno-mifologicheskogo mirovozzreniya i mify o religioznosti // Vestn. Zabaikal. gos. un-ta. 2010. № 3. S. 27–33. 14. Kapilupi S. M. «Tragicheskii optimizm» khristianstva i problema spaseniya: F. M. Dostoevskii. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2014. 288 s. 15. Kuchmaeva Yu. G. Dukhovnye osnovy monastyrskoi kul’tury srednevekovoi Bolgarii (IX–XIV vv.): avtoref. dis. … kand. kul’turologii. M., 2003. 31 s. 16. Lunkin R. Novye religioznye dvizheniya v Rossii: khristianstvo i postkhristianstvo v zerkale novykh bogov i prorokov [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://polit.ru/article/2009/09/28/religiya/ (data obrashcheniya: 09.02.2016). 17. Lutsenko A. V. «Ideologiya sovremennogo zapadnoevropeiskogo neoyazychestva: sotsiokul’turnyi aspekt»: dis. … kand. filos. nauk. Chita, 2015. 176 s. 18. Lyusyi A. P. Moskovskii tekst: Tekstologicheskaya kontseptsiya russkoi kul’tury. M.: VEChE: Russkii impul’s, 2013. 320 s. 19. Mitroshenkov O. A. Filosofiya slavyanofilov v sovremennoi russkoi istoriko-filosofskoi literature: dis. … kand. filos. nauk. M., 2003. 193 s. 20. Panarin A. S. Pravoslavnaya tsivilizatsiya: sb. M.: In-t russk. tsivilizatsii, 2014. 1248 s. 21. Silant’eva M. V. Mental’no-simvolicheskoe preodolenie bar’era «svoi – chuzhoi» kak osnova strategii osvoeniya inokul’turnogo prostranstva // V sb.: Dialog kul’tur i partnerstvo tsivilizatsii: XIV Mezhdunar. Likhachevskie nauch. chteniya / Ros. akad. nauk, Ros. akad. obrazovaniya, Kongress peterb. intelligentsii, Sankt-Peterb. gumanit. un-t profsoyuzov. SPb., 2014. S. 429–431. 22. Shakhnovich M. M. Sad Epikura. Filosofiya religii Epikura i epikureiskaya traditsiya v istorii evropeiskoi kul’tury. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU, 2002. 284 s. 23. Shchipkov V. A. Transformatsiya diskursa prostranstva: ot traditsionnogo obshchestva k epokhe postmoderna // Vestn. MGIMO-Universitet. 2015. № 3 (42). 24. Beck, Ulrich & Grande, Edgar. Varieties of second modernity: extra-European and European experiences and perspectives. British Journal of Sociology, 2010. Vol 61, Issue 3. Р. 406–638. 25. Thomas Luckmann. The invisible religion: the problem of religion in modern society. New York New York: Macmillan Company, 1967. 128 p. |
| Full article | National Cultural Myth in Contemporary Transcendence: the Philosophical Analysis |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
