| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Space and Time of Virtual Narrative: Fractal Approach |
| Authors | Shaev Y.M. Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor, existentia20065@yandex.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Shaev Yu. M. Space and Time of Virtual Narrative: Fractal Approach // Humanitarian Vector. Series Philosophy. Cultural Studies. 2016. Vol. 11, No 2. P. 81–91. |
| Section | PHILOSOPHY AND CULTURE IN THE SPACE OF CONTEMPORARY CIVILIZATION |
| UDK | 115.4:004.946 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | This article analyzes time and space of virtual narrative, which are compared to a fractal approach in science and philosophy. Virtual narrative is considered as realization of the story line of computer video games or interactive cinema. The examples of modern computer games, which are implemented in the framework of virtual narrative – modern video games with an open world game. The space of the virtual computer game narrative is represented as a complex phenomenon that implements the features of the gameplay, visual effects and principles of algorithmization, the complexity of which is isomorphic to fractals and fractal principles of visualization complexity. The time in virtual narrative is also considered in the view of fractal complexity examples of metamorphosis timeline within the virtual narrative. The conclusion is made about the possible productivity of fractal theory in the description of the multilayer structure of ontology of virtual narrative and its main components – space and time. |
| Key words | space, time, virtual narrative, videogame, virtual space, fractal, sign |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Bychkov V. V., Man’kovskaya N. B. Virtual’naya real’nost’ kak fenomen sovremennogo iskusstva. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://iph.ras.ru/page47631358.htm. (data obrashcheniya: 24.12.2015). 2. Donovan T. Igrai! Istoriya videoigr / per. s angl. M.: Beloe Yabloko, 2014. 648 s. 3. Zhizhek S. Chuma fantazii / per. s angl. Khar’kov: Guman. tsentr, 2012. 388 s. 4. Kiryushchenko V. V. Yazyk i znak v pragmatizme. SPb.: Izd-vo Evrop. un-ta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2008. 200 s. 5. Mandel’brot B. Fraktal’naya geometriya prirody / per. s angl. M.: In-t komp. issl., 2002. 656 s. 6. Mandel’brot B., Khadson R. L. (Ne) poslushnye rynki: fraktal’naya revolyutsiya v finansakh / per. s angl. M.: Vil’yams, 2006. 400 s. 7. Nosov N. A. Psikhologicheskie virtual’nye real’nosti. M.: In-t cheloveka RAN, 1994. 196 s. 8. Openkov M. Yu. Virtual’naya real’nost’: onto-dialogicheskii podkhod: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filos. nauk. M., 1997. 38 s. 9. Samoilova E. O. Virtual’nyi narrativ komp’yuternoi igry: obshchee i osobennoe // Vestn. Pyatigor. gos. lingv. un-ta. 2013. № 4. S. 215–217. 10. Tarasenko V. V. Fraktal’naya semiotika: «slepye pyatna», peripetii i uznavaniya. M.: LIBROKOM, 2009. 232 s. 11. McGonigal J. Reality is Broken. Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. New York: The Penguin Press, 2011. 388 p. 12. Bogost J. How To Talk About Videogames. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015. 208 p. 13. Laurel B. Computers as Theatre. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2014. 246 p. |
| Full article | Space and Time of Virtual Narrative: Fractal Approach |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
