Article
Article name	Philosophy of Medicine: Problems of Bioethics
Authors	Shishkin A.E. Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, ladomir12345@rambler.ru
Bibliographic description	Shishkin A. E. Philosophy of Medicine: Problems of Bioethics // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 4. PP. 62–67. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-4-62-67
Section	Social philosophy
UDK	101. 17.02. 614.253
DOI	10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-4-62-67
Article type
Annotation	The market creates conditions not of paternalistic but of commercial relations between patients and doctors, therefore issues of moral life, high-quality pharmacy, genetic engineering, cloning, fetal therapy, transplantology, euthanasia and abortions will be solved in favor of business and military interests. The challenge we face is to find a regulatory method that resolves the contradiction between patients and professional medical communities, law and truth, benefit-benefit and tradition-duty with the help of the potential possibilities of a cultural-historical person. The hermeneutic, existential and soteriological approaches that we used allowed us to discover not a literal, but a sacred meaning of the genesis of bioethics. Our scientific novelty in teaching bioethics is presented not only as an academic discipline but also as a social institution that is able to resist the institutional war. In the doctor-patient communication models, there has been a paradigm shift from paternalistic and collegial to engineering and contractual ones. In the conditions of 80 percent poverty of the population, the transition of the philosophy of medicine to commercial relations means a slow “crawling into the color revolution”.In the era of post-rational thinking, the traditional field of medical ethics is captured by the Leviathan market, which is the real threat to humanity through the cloning of chimeras and the justification of technological acts in the name of progress under the guise of virtue. Our idea and way out of the simulation activities of the expert system of bioethical committees lies in the new focus of understanding of the discipline from the perspective of the security of the sector.
Key words	cloning, consistent security, consumerism, communitarianism, cultural-historical man, transhumanism
Article information
References	1. Biomedical ethics. Ed. by acad. Pokrovsky, I. N. M: Medicine, 1997. (In Rus.) 2. Illness: experience, narrative, hope. Essay on social and human studies of medicine. Vilnius: Logvino literatūros namai, 2018. (In Rus.) 3. Vich, R. Models of moral medicine in the era of revolutionary changes. Questions of philosophy, pp. 67–72, no. 3, 1994. (In Rus.) 4. Zilber, A. P. Sketches of critical medicine. M: MEDpress-inform, 2006. (In Rus.) 5. Kanke, V. A. The main philosophical directions and concepts of science. The result and XX century. M: Logos, 2000. (In Rus.) 6. Kant, I. On the imaginary right to lie out of philanthropy // Kant I. Sobr. cit. Jubilee edition: in 8 v. V. 8. M: Choro Publishers, pp. 257–262. 1994. (In Rus.) 7. Kashapov, F. A. Philosophical foundations of bioethics. Chelyabinsk, 2005. (In Rus.) 8. Larina, E., Ovchinsky, V. Killer Robots Against Humanity. Kiberapokalipsis today. M: Book World, 2016. (In Rus.) 9. Panarin, A. S. Orthodox civilization in the global world. M: Algorithm, 2002. (In Rus.) 10. Transition, M. A. Ontologization of the object of knowledge. The complicity of truth. Alma mater (Herald of Higher Education), pp. 32–37, no. 2, 2019. (In Rus.) 11. Prot. Leonid Griliches Biblical view on the causes and nature of disease. Orthodoxy and problems of bioethics. Collection of works. M: 2017. (In Rus.) 12. Spinoza. Selected Works: in 2 v. V. 1. M: State publishing house of political literature, 1957. (In Rus.) 13. Troitsky, K. E. On the right to lie. Continuation of the discussion. Ethical Thought, vol .16, no. 1, pp. 77–92, 2016. (In Rus.) 14. Fromm, E. To have or to be? M: Progress, 1990. (In Rus.) 15. Shishkin, A. E. Bioethics as a modus of institutional safety. Samara: Dream, 2018. (In Rus.) 16. Shishkin, A. E. Metaphysics of the institutional war. Samara: Dream, 2018. (In Rus.) 17. Shishkin, A. E. Problems of development of the traditional value approach to the interpretation of the results of a sociological study: in 2 v. Barnaul: C-Press, 2012. (In Rus.)
Full article	Philosophy of Medicine: Problems of Bioethics
	0
	37