| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Heuristic Status of Intuitive Knowledge |
| Authors | Bakhmetiev A.E. Postgraduate Student, arthurbakhmetiev1993@gmail.com |
| Bibliographic description | Bakhmetiev A. E. Heuristic Status of Intuitive Knowledge // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 4. PP. 107–114. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-4-107-114 |
| Section | PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE |
| UDK | 740 |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-4-107-114 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | This article analyzes the ontological and gnoseological aspects of intuitive knowledge that confirm its heuristic status in the field of philosophy. The study of the heuristic status of intuitive knowledge is of particular interest for understanding the specifics of the problem of the invention, as well as the essence of the thinking process as such. Intuition, having a heuristic status, allows you to create and design inventions. Intuition is a basic attribute of the creative process. The key concepts used in this article are the philosophical system of P. K. Engelmeyer, N. Hartman, Ayn Rand and M. Bunge. The basic definition of intuition formulated by Engelmeyer points to a fundamental sign of intuitive cognition – the creation of the new through work with experience. Intuition acts as a transition between feeling, reason and reason. Engelmeyer, in his conception, declares the structure of the invention creation process. The attributive structure of Bunge’s intuitive cognition (intuition as perception, as imagination, as mind, as evaluation), constructs a scheme for the functioning of intuition. In the concepts of Hartmann and Ayn Rand, intuitive cognition appears as a form of seizing the existing. Hartman and Ayn Rand indicate the ontological and epistemological nature of intuitive knowledge. |
| Key words | Intuition, knowledge, idea, creativity, invention, heuristics |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Arno A., Nikol’ P. Logic, or the Art of Thinking. M: Nauka, 1991. (In Rus.) 2. Bergson, A. Creative evolution. Web: 20.03.2019. http://www.bim-bad.ru/docs/bergson_creative_evolution.pdf (In Rus.) 3. Bunge, М. Intuition and science. M: Progress, 1967. (In Rus.) 4. Gartman, N. To the foundation of ontology. М: Nauka, 2003. (In Rus.) 5. Gete, I. V. Selected works on natural science. M: AN SSSR, 1957. (In Rus.) 6. Kant, I. Works: in 6 v. V. 2. M: Mysl’, 1964. (In Rus.) 7. Kroche, B. Anthology of essays on philosophy. SPb: Pnevma, 1999. (In Rus.) 8. Lapshin, I. I. Philosophy of invention and invention in philosophy. Introduction to the history of philosophy. M: Respublika, 1999. (In Rus.) 9. Levin, I. D. Writings: in 2 v. V. I. M: Radiks, 1994. (In Rus.) 10. Nesterov, A. Yu. Semiotic foundations of technology and technical consciousness: monograph. Samara: Izdatel’stvo Samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, 2017. (In Rus.) 11. Ognev, А. N. Values as a factor in the ideological self-determination of the individual. Samara: KRYPTEN – Волга, 2018. (In Rus.) 12. Puankare, A. About science. M: Nauka, 1990. (In Rus.) 13. Rend, A. Introduction to objectivist epistemology. M: Astrel’, 2012. (In Rus.) 14. Sossyur, F. de. The course of general linguistics. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1999. (In Rus.) 15. Engelmeyer, P. К. Theory of Creativity. M: Knizhnyi dom LIBROKOM, 2010. (In Rus.) |
| Full article | Heuristic Status of Intuitive Knowledge |
| 0 | |
| 33 | |
