| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Myth-creation about China on the Territory of the Russian-Chinese Border as a Subject of Scientific Discourse |
| Authors | Kononov S.V. Candidate of Philosophy, kononov7744@yandex.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Kononov S. V. Myth-creation about China on the Terri- tory of the Russian-Chinese Border as a Subject of Scientific Discourse // Humanitarian Vector. Series Philosophy. Cultur- al Studies. 2016. Vol. 11, No 2. P. 104–111. |
| Section | PHILOSOPHY OF CULTURE AND ART-CULTURAL KNOWLEDGE |
| UDK | 304.9 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The paper analyzes an urgent problem of understanding the processes of China’s perception by the population of the Russian-Chinese border areas. The author notes that a specific direction in Sinology has been developed and it is connected with the study of the reception of images of China. The object sphere of these researches aims to explore the consciousness of the Russians who are in the sphere of China influence, the subject of the researches is the images of China, spread at the level of mass consciousness. One aspect of the research is the projection of images, designed as a part of Chinese culture and distributed by China among the non-Chinese population. Another aspect is presented by the reception of images of China, being reproduced and distributed by the Russians in Russia. In general, the analysis of the literature and sources mentioned allows the author to prove that a large number of authors writing about the image of China tend to identify Chinese images and Chinese reality not taking into account the fact that the images are usually the result of myth-creation activity of certain subjects of political, economic or cultural effects. The author notes that the main discourse around the image of China is devoted to an attempt to clarify the nature of China’s influence on Russia. In the context of that process the “alarmist” and “pragmatic” images of China opposed to each other are discussed. Besides, it is necessary to analyze myth-creation and design activity of forces that have political and other purposes in connection with the spread of certain types of myth-creation about China. The author proves that most of the authors who dealt with the perception of images of China touched only the Chinese theme in the discussion of all-Russian and international trends. At the same time, a special study of myth-creation about China on the territory of the Russian-Chinese border has not been carried out. |
| Key words | Transbaikalia, image of China, Chinese images, myth-creation about China, “pragmatism”, “alarmism”, reception of images |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Arin O. ATR: mify, illyuzii i real’nost’. Vostochnaya Aziya: ekonomika, politika i bezopasnost’. M.: Flinta, Nauka, 1997. 436 s. 2. Arsent’eva I. I., Mikhailenko A. N. Rossiiskoe prigranich’e: vchera, segodnya, zavtra // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2014. № 6 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: www.science-education.ru/120–15306 (data obrashcheniya: 21.11.2015). 3. Bzhezinskii Z. Velikaya shakhmatnaya doska. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2010. 256 s. 4. Blagoder Yu. G. Obraz Kitaya v pis’mennykh svidetel’stvakh rossiiskikh puteshestvennikov i diplomatov XVII – nach. XX v. Krasnodar: Kuban. gos. un-t, 2005. 284 s. 5. Voskresenskii A. D. Kitai i Rossiya v Evrazii: istoricheskaya dinamika politicheskikh vzaimovliyanii. M.: Muravei, 2004. 603 s. 6. Gel’bras V. G. Natsional’naya bezopasnost’ Rossii: vyzovy kitaiskoi migratsii // Migratsiya i bezopasnost’ v Rossii. M.: Interdialekt, 2004. S. 188–226. 7. Golubtsov V. V. Voennye sobytiya 1900 g. na Amure. Blagoveshchensk: Tip. G. I. Klitchoglu i Ko, 1901. 152 s. 8. Grave V. V. Kitaitsy, koreitsy i yapontsy v Priamur’e // Trudy Komandirovannoi po Vysochaishemu poveleniyu Amurskoi Ekspeditsii. Vyp. 11. SPb.: Tip. V. F. Kirshbauma, 1912. 489 s. 9. Zhukov A. V. Religioznoe mifotvorchestvo v obydennoi religioznosti naseleniya Baikal’skogo regiona: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filos. nauk: 09.00.14. Chita, 2011. 45 s. 10. Kruzhalina A. A. Obraz Kitaya i Kitaiskogo naroda na stranitsakh sibirskoi pressy v istoricheskoi retrospektive // Rossiya i Kitai: perspektivy sotrudnichestva: materialy 2-i Mezhdunar. nauch. prakt. konf. Blagoveshchensk, 2012. S. 53–59. 11. Kychanov E. I. Obraz Kitaya v Rossii XVII v. // Vestn. Vostochn. in-ta. 1997. № 2 (6). T. 3. S. 70–80. 12. Larin A. Rossiisko-kitaiskie otnosheniya i kitaiskie migranty v otsenke rossiyan // Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka. 2008. № 5. S.111–123. 13. Lepeshev N. (Ier.) Kharakternye cherty pravoslavnoi missii na Dal’nem Vostoke // Khristianstvo na Dal’nem Vostoke: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Khabarovsk, 2006. S. 24–27. 14. Li I. Obraz Kitaya v russkoi poezii Kharbina // Russkaya literatura XX veka: itogi i perspektivy izucheniya: sb. nauch. tr., posvyashch. 60-letiyu prof. V. V. Agenosova. M., 2002. S. 174–180. 15. Lukin A. B. Medved’ nablyudaet za drakonom. Obraz Kitaya v Rossii v XVII–XXI vekakh. M.: ACT: Vostok-Zapad, 2007. 598 s. 16. Maslov A. Nablyudaya za kitaitsami. Skrytye pravila povedeniya. M.: RIPOLklassik, 2010. 288 s. 17. Raev M. Rossiya za rubezhom. Istoriya kul’tury russkoi emigratsii 1919–1939. M.: Progress-Akademiya, 1994. 296 s. 18. Skachkov P. E. Ocherki istorii russkogo kitaevedeniya. M. Nauka, 1977. 503 s. 19. Tishkov V. A. Edinstvo v mnogoobrazii: publikatsii iz zhurnala «Etnopanorama» 1999–2011 gg. Orenburg: OGAU, 2011. 232 s. 20. Titarenko M. L. Rossiya i ee aziatskie partnery v globaliziruyushchemsya mire. Strategicheskoe sotrudnichestvo: problemy i perspektivy. M.: FORUM, 2012. 544 s. 21. Trenin D. Kitaiskaya problema Rossii. M.: Tsentr Karnegi, 1998. 57 s. 22. Fishman O. L. Kitai v Evrope: mif i real’nost’ (XIII–XVIII vv.). SPb.: IVRAN, 2003. 544 s. 23. Sharavin A., Glushkov V. Ni pobedy, ni porazheniya // Nezavisimoe voennoe obozrenie. № 36. S.5. 24. Maggs B. Russia and «Le ReveChinois»: China in Eighteenth Century Russian Literature. Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation, 1984. 179 p. 25. Rozman G. Moscow’s China-Watchers in the Post-Mao Era: The Response to a Changing China // The China Quarterly, June 1983. P. 215–241. Istochniki 26. Davydov S. I. Dal’nii Vostok na styke tsivilizatsii: problemy kul’turnoi geopolitiki [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.povestka.ru/culture/n25.htm (data obrashcheniya: 15.11.2015). 27. Evropeiskie eksperty isklyuchili Rossiyu iz spiska bystrorazvivayushchikhsya stran // Gazeta.Ru. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2011/12/02_a_3855550.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 28.10.2015). 28. Zotov O. Kitaitsy na rossiiskom Dal’nem vostoke: norma ili ugroza? // Russkii zhurnal. 25 apr. 2001 g. S. 6 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://toz.khv.ru/newspaper/arkhiv/2001_05_04_kitaytsy_na_rossiyskom_dalnem_vostoke_norma_ili_ ugroza/ (data obrashcheniya: 21.11.2015). 29. Kitaiskii general prizyvaet k «nastupleniyu na Zapad» [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.epochtimes.ru/ content/view/65453/4/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.11.2015). 30. «Kitaiskii narod ne rassmatrivaet Sibir’ dlya postoyannogo mesta prozhivaniya» [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://zabmedia.ru/?page=articles&rubr=5&text=3266&p=1http://zabmedia.ru/?page=articles&rubr=5&text=3266&p=1 (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2015). 31. Morozov Yu. V. K chemu mozhet privesti publikatsiya mifov o kitaiskoi ugroze [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.onolitegi.ru/2010-02-03-17-38-52/42-political-analyzis/119-chinese-miths.html (data obrashcheniya: 09.10.2015). 32. Rossiiskie eksperty otritsayut nalichie ugrozy kitaiskikh immigrantov Dal’nemu Vostoku RF [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://russian.people.com.cn/95181/6670943.html (data obrashcheniya: 20.11.2015). 33. Khramchikhin A. A. Milliony soldat plyus sovremennoe vooruzhenie. Kitaiskaya armiya menyaet orientiry [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://nuclearno.ru/text.asp?14070 (data obrashcheniya: 05.08.2015). |
| Full article | Myth-creation about China on the Territory of the Russian-Chinese Border as a Subject of Scientific Discourse |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
