| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Script, Frame, Scheme in a Literary Text |
| Authors | Karipzhanova G.T. Candidate of Philology, Аssociate Professor, adon70@mail.ruAbikenov M.T. Candidate of Philology, Аssociate Professor, adon70@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Karipzhanova G. T., Abikenov M. T. Script, Frame, Scheme in a Literary Text // Humanitarian Vector. Series Philology, Oriental Studies. 2016. Vol. 11, No 3. P. 105–110. |
| Section | LANGUAGE THEORY AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION |
| UDK | 81`1 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article analyzes the script based on Zh. Aymauytov’s works. The script is important in understanding the national character. Zh. Aymauytov skillfully uses comparisons inherent in the Kazakh mentality. The script formed the outlook of a particular nation. The article also examines the frame in a literary text. Frames are linguistic units gathered around a certain concept. These concepts provide a simple prospective information based on a specific concept associations. In addition, frames can definitely describe the national features. The frame is similar to the script, but the script is characterized by the predominance of statistical states and the frame is characterized by a dynamic state. The article also defines the term ‘‘scheme’’ in Zh. Aymauytov’s works. The writer uses symbols and signs appropriate for the Kazakh mentality comparing them more accurately and vividly in description of a particular object, action or phenomenon. |
| Key words | text, theme, idea, linguistics, concept, portrait |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Gizdatov G. Soileu kyzmetindegi kognitivtik model’der: tipologiyasy men dinamikasy: dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Almaty, 2005. 316 s. 2. Zaisanbaeva G. Metaforaly atalymdardyn kognitivtik aspektisi (birikken zat ataulary negizinde): dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Almaty, 2004. 3. Kaidar E. Kazak tilinin ozekti meseleleri. Almaty, 2001. 4. Kordabaev T., Kaliev G. Zhalpy til bilimi. Almaty, 2004, 236 b. 5. Minskii M. Freimy dlya predstavleniya znanii. M., 1979. 151 s. 6. Pimenova M. V. Predislovie // Vvedenie v kognitivnuyu lingvistiku / Z. D. Popova, I. A. Sternin, V. I. Karasik, A. A. Kretov, O. O. Boriskina, E. A. Pimenov, M. V. Pimenova; pod red. M. V. Pimenovoi. Kemerovo: Grafika, 2004. 7. Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A. Yazyk i soznanie: teoreticheskie razgranicheniya i ponyatiinyi aparat // Yazyk i natsional’noe soznanie. Vopr. teorii i metodologii. Voronezh: Voronezh. gos. un-t, 2002. S. 8–50. 8. Tarasova I. A. Kategorii kognitivnoi lingvistiki v issledovanii idiostilya // Yazykoznanie. 2004. № 1. S. 14–18. 9. Khaleeva I. M. Vtorichnaya yazykovaya lichnost’ kak retsipient inofonnogo teksta // Yazyk – sistema. Yazyk – tekst. Yazyk – sposobnost’. M., 1995. S. 277–285. 10. Khachmafova Z. R., Makerova S. R. Kognitivnye sistemy yazykovoi lichnosti v protsesse interpretatsii khudozhestvennogo teksta // Vest. MGOU. Ser. Rus. filologiya. 2010. № 1. |
| Full article | Script, Frame, Scheme in a Literary Text |
| 0 | |
| 6 | |
