Article
Article name	Small Prose by M. Tarkovsky in the Context of “New Realism”
Authors	Kovtun N.V. Doctor of Philology, Professor, nkovtun@mail.ru
Bibliographic description	Kovtun N. V. Small Prose by M. Tarkovsky in the Context of “New Realism” // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 5. PP. 39–50. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-5-39-50.
Section	THE GLASS BEAD GAME: HIDDEN MEANINGS OF THE TEXT
UDK	82
DOI	10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-5-39-50
Article type
Annotation	The article is devoted to the analysis of Russian prose of the turn of the XXth – XXIst centuries, its leading directions, among which “new realism” stands out. The history and poetics of “new realism” are analyzed, the circle of names included in this literary field is outlined. Particular attention is paid to the increasingly controversial direction of “new realism”, which is represented by two key areas: patriotic and naturalistic. The “new realism” authors actively form their own mythology, taking part in politics, and trying to reconcile Soviet and anti-Soviet discourses, interest in the problems of modernity. The article uses historical-cultural, comparative-typological and structural-semiotic methods of analysis. The article provides a detailed analysis of the literary work by Siberian author M. Tarkovsky: from the early short stories and novels before the novel Toyota-Cresta. Tarkovsky’s work combines elements of the poetics of “classical traditionalism” and “new realism” to present an original geopolitical project and a cultural character capable of bringing the country to a new level of civilization. An important feature of the author’s letter is optimism, the writer believes in the possibility of reconciliation of a rural resident, a hunter and “civilized wanderer”, who went in search of “clean lands”.
Key words	modern Russian prose, “classical traditionalism”, neo-traditionalism, “new realism”, Zakhar Prilepin, Roman Senchin, Mikhail Tarkovsky
Article information
References	1. Boguslavskiy, V. M. Man in the mirror of Russian culture, literature and language. M: Kosmopolis, 1994. (In Rus.) 2. Val’yanov, N. A. Chronotope of the house in the poetics by M. A. Tarkovsky. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. P. Astaf’eva, pp. 174–179, no. 1 , 2017. (In Rus.) 3. Goricheva, T. M. Postmodernism and Christianity. L: LGU, 1990. (In Rus.) 4. Danilkin, L. Parthian arrow. Counterattack on Russian literature 2005. SPb: Amfora. (In Rus.) 5. Ermolin, E. A. Mediums of timelessness: Literature in the postmodern era, or Transavangard. M: Vremya, 2015. (In Rus.) 6. Ivanova, N. B. In the direction of the imaginary non-fiction (the Modern novel in search of the genre). Znamya, pp. 186–195, no. 1, 2016. (In Rus.) 7. Kalita, I. V. The case of “new realism”. Voprosy literatury, pp. 123–140, no. 6, 2015. (In Rus.) 8. Kovtun, N. V. ACTUAL LITERATURE IN THE MIRROR OF MANIFESTOS (“My manifesto” by V. Rasputin, “The EPS Doctrine” by V. Erofeev, “The Denial of mourning” by S. Schargunov). LITERATURA (Rusisrica Villnensis), pp. 52–65, no. 58, 2016. (In Rus.) 9. Kovtun, N. V. Interiorization myth: from the “blessed” mother to Palevo (copyright dialogue Rasputin and R. Senchina).Vestnik OmGPU, no. 4, pp. 81–87, 2017. (In Rus.) 10. Lipovetskiy, M. Н. Political motor skills of Zakhar Prilepin. Znamya, no. 10, 2012.Web.10.06.2019: http://www.magazines.russ.ru/znamia/2012/10/li12.htm 11. Kulyapin, A. I. Semiotics of the artistic space V. M. Shukshin: monografiya. Barnaul: AltGPU, 2016. (In Rus.) 12. Mitrofanova, A. А. Idyll of Mikhail Tarkovsky. Modernity in the mirror of reflection: language-culture-education. Proceedings of the 5 International Scientifi c Conference. Irkutsk: IGU, 2009: 432–438. (In Rus.) 13. Panchenko, A. M. I emigrated to Ancient Russia. Russia: history and culture. Works of different years. SPb: Zvezda, 2005. (In Rus.) 14. Parte, K. Russian village prose: a Bright past. Tomsk: Izd-vo TGU, 2004. (In Rus.) 15. Plekhanova, I. I. The work of V. Rasputin and the philosophy of traditionalism. Time and creativity of Valentin Rasputin: history, context, perspectives. Proceedings International Scientific and Practical Conference. Irkutsk: Izd-vo IGU, 2012: 60–90. (In Rus.) 16. Pustovaya, V. E. Thick criticism. Russian prose in actual generalizations. M: RGGU, 2012. (In Rus.) 17. Remizova, M. Only text. Post-Soviet prose and its reflection in literary criticism. M: Sovpadenie, 2007. (In Rus.) 18. Rudalev, A. The second breath of “new realism”: Web. 10.06.2019: http://www.glfr. ru/svobodnaja-kafedra/vtoroe-dihanie-novogo-realizma-andrej-rudaljov.html. (In Rus.) 19. Senchin, R. V. Stranger. Znamya, no. 1, pp. 287–302, 2004. (In Rus.) 20. Stepanova, V. A. The chronotope of prose by M. Tarkovsky: redefining traditionalism. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. P. Astaf’eva, pp. 216–222, no. 1, 2017. (In Rus.) 21. Timofeev, A. N. Victories and defeats of “new realism”. Voprosy literatury, pp. 83–106, no. 5, 2017. (In Rus.) 22. Toporov, V. N. Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image: Research in the field of mythopoetic. M.: Progress-Kul’tura, 1995. (In Rus.) 23. Toporov, V. N. Text of the city-virgin and the city-harlot in mythopoetic aspect. Research on text structure. M., 1987: 121–132. (In Rus.) 24. Chistov, K. V. Legend of Belovodye. Trudy Karel’skogo filiala AN SSSR. Petrozavodsk 1967. T. 35. (In Rus.) 25. Shargunov, S. A. Denial of mourning. New world, pp. 179–184, no. 12, 2001. (In Rus.) 26. Belaya, G. The Self Destruction of Closea Cultures // Critical Studies. Vol. 6. Amsterdam: Atlante, 1996: 175–180. (In Engl.) 27. Brudny, Y. Reinventing Russia, Russian Nationalism and the Soviet State, 1953–1991. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard university press, 2000. (In Engl.) 28. Gillespie, D. Social Spirit, Private Doubts. The Life and Work of Fyodor Abramov. Northwestern University Press, 1997. (In Engl.)
Full article	Small Prose by M. Tarkovsky in the Context of “New Realism”
	0
	0