References |
1.
Bakhtin, M. M. The questions of literature and aesthetics. M: Hudozshestvennaya literature Publ., 1975. (In Rus.)
2.
Verbitskaya, M. V. Theory of secondary texts: on the basis of modern English. Moscow, MSU Publ., 2000. (In Rus.)
3.
Karasik, V. I. The Language Matrix of Culture. Volgograd, Paradigm Publ., 2012. (In Rus.)
4.
Kasatkina, K. A. Formation of intercultural competence in groups of students of non-linguistic faculties. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Niznyi Novgorod: NNPU named after K. Minin, 2015: 163–171. (In Rus.)
5.
Krasnykh, V. V. “Native” among the “alien”: myth or reality?, Moscow, Gnosis Publ., 2003, (In Rus.)
6.
Nikitina, T. G. Concepts “garden” and “desert” in the novels by Frank Herbert from the Dune series. TSU Vektor Nauki, pp. 134–140, no. 41, 2017. (In Rus.)
7.
Nikitina, T. G. Transferring modal semantics in translating literary work from English into Russian. Proceedings of the V International correspondence conference, Tolyatti: TSU, 2016: 121–127. (In Rus.)
8.
Shukurov, D. L. Discourse of M. M. Bakhtin and the theory of intertextuality. Izvestiya vuzov: The Humanities series, pp. 105–109, no. 2, 2012. (In Rus.)
9.
Akhmadian, M., Yazdani, H. A study of the effects of intertextuality awareness on reading literary texts: the case of short stories. Journal of Educational and Social Research, pp. 155–166, no. 2, 2013. DOI: 10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n2p155. (In Engl.)
10.
Haberer, A. Intertextuality in theory and practice. Literatûra, pp. 54–67, no. 5, 2007. (In Rus.)
11.
Hart, C. Melange. The science of Dune: An unauthorized exploration into the real science. Dallas, Ben Bella Books:1–18. (In Engl.)
12.
Juvan, M. Towards a history of intertextuality in literary and culture studies. Comparative Literature and Culture, no. 3, vol. 10, 2008. DOI: 10.7771/1481-4374.1370. (In Engl.)
13.
Lunkova, L. N. The patterns of intertextuality. International Research Journal, no. 5, 2012. Web. 29.06.2019: https://www. research-journal.org/en/philology/the-patterns-of-intertextuality/. (In Engl.)
14.
Martin, E. Intertextuality: an introduction. The Comparatist, pp. 148–151, vol. 35, 2011. (In Engl.)
15.
O’Reilly, T. Frank Herbert. New York, Frederick Ungar Publishing, 1981. (In Engl.)
16.
Ott, B., Walter, C. Intertextuality: interpretive practice and textual strategy. Critical Studies in Media Communication, pp. 429–446, no. 4, 2000. (In Engl.)
17.
Rogers, B. How Harkonnen shall kill Harkonnen: Aeachilus, dynastic violence and twofold tragedies in Frank Herbert’s Dune. Brill’s companion to the reception of Aeschylus. Leiden, Boston, Brill, 1983: 553–582. (In Engl.)
18.
Rudd, A. Paul’s empire: imperialism and assemblage theory in Frank Herbert’s Dune. MOSF Journal of Science Fiction, 2016, vol. 1, no. 1. Web: 29.06.2019. https://www.publish.lib.umd.edu/scifi/article/view/247. (In Engl.)
19.
Simkins, J. The science fiction mythmakers: religion, science and philosophy in Wells, Clarke, Dick and Herbert. Jefferson, McFarland, 2016. (In Engl.)
20.
Todd, T. Meanings and authorships in Dune. Film-Philosophy, pp. 68 – 89, no. 1, vol. 13, 2009. Web. 29.06.2019. http://www.film-philosophy.com/2009v13n1/todd.pdf. (In Engl.)
21.
Zengin, M. An Introduction to intertextuality as a literary theory: definitions, axioms and the originators. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences, pp. 299 – 327, vol. 50, 2016. DOI: 10.5505/pausbed.2016.96729. (In Engl.) |