| Annotation |
In the scientific literature, the study of the typology of journal periodicals is a significant and debatable problem. With the increasing number of periodicals and the continued segmentation of the print media audience, there are some new magazines that cannot always be successfully introduced into existing typologies. Publications of a pro-family theme have become an integral part of the modern media system; they have not only recognizable typological characteristics but also require further classification. An important segment of the media market, in our opinion, is newspapers and magazines for foster parents, which must be positioned as separate specialized publications. The authors of the article suggest considering magazines for foster parents within three typological groups: children’s bases, magazines for potential foster parents and magazines for families in which foster children are brought up. Separately, we can designate magazines that are published for specialists of guardianship and custody bodies and organizations that professionally deal with the family placement of orphans and children left without parental care. The indicated typological groups are a generalization of the results of the content analysis of the publications of magazines for foster parents. They recorded similarities and differences in the content of publications of various types, which were identified by induction, systematization and interpretation of the data of the study. The article focuses on the fact that the modern family needs information support, along with legal, socio-economic support from the state and society. The presence in the modern media space of socially oriented publications, which include magazines for foster parents, contributes to a positive change in the vector of disseminated media of family information. |
| References |
1.
Avtaeva, N. O. Editions for foster parents as a social media project. Journalism in 2018: creativity, profession, industry. M: F-t. zhurn. MGU. 2019: 275–276. (In Rus.)
2.
Avtaeva, N. O., Savinova, O. N. The role of media and advertising in popularizing the values of a traditional family as an important factor in the spiritual health of a nation. Journalism for the health of a nation. Human potential in the Russian media discourse. M: F-t zhurn. MGU. 2018: 132–152. (In Rus.)
3.
Adilova, L. F., Mishchenko V. A. The image of family and family values in the Russian media. Bulletin of the RSUH. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Art criticism, no. 4, pp. 108–116, 2014. (In Rus.)
4.
Zatsepina, I. A. The concept, types and characteristics of social media projects. University complex as a regional center of education, science and culture. Orenburg: GOU OGU, 2013: 3194–3197. (In Rus.)
5.
Leont’eva, A. G. Protection of the family, motherhood and childhood – an actual direction of socio-economic policy in the region. Bulletin of the Tyumen State University, no. 4, 222–228, 2010. (In Rus.)
6.
Resnyanskaya, L. L. All-Russian newspaper editions. Bulletin of Moscow State University, pp. 3–8, no. 4, 2000. (In Rus.)
7.
Savinova, O. N. Popularization of traditional family values in regional media: a journalistic aspect. Media in the modern world. Petersburg readings. SPb: SPBGU, 2014: 58–60. (In Rus.)
8.
Svitich, L. G. Family and the future of Russia. Case study: content analysis of competitive publications. M: F-t zhurn. MGU, 2015. (In Rus.)
9.
Smirnova, O. V., Frolova, T. I. The crisis of the family in media measurements (analysis of texts of the Russian media). Bulletin of Moscow University, pp. 203–227, no. 1, 2011. (In Rus.)
10.
Frolova, T. I. The humanitarian agenda of the Russian media: theoretical model, journalistic practices, development strategies. Dr. fil. sci. diss. abstr. M., 2015. (In Rus.)
11.
Shkondin, M. V. The media system as a factor in public dialogue. M: Pul’s, 2002. (In Rus.)
12.
Shostak, M. I. Magazines in the media system: typology and “niches” of publications. Typology of periodicals. M: Aspekt Press, 2009: 79–92. (In Rus.)
13.
Aseltine, R. H., Kessler, R. C. Marital Disruption and Depression in a Community Sample. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, pp. 237–251, no. 3, 1993. (In Engl.)
14.
Liu, R. X., Zeng-yin, Chen. The Effects of Marital Conflict and Marital Disruption on Depressive Affect. Social Science Quarterly. Jun. pp. 250–271, no. 2, 2006. (In Engl.)
15.
Wyn J., Lantz S., Harris A. Family relations and young people in late modernity. Journal of Sociology, pp. 3–22, vol. 48, 2012. (In Engl.) |
