| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Ontology of Landscape and Complex Categories in Spatial Synergy |
| Authors | Hladkyi A.V. Doctor of Geography, Professor, alexander.gladkey@gmail.comOlifir D.I. Candidate of Geography, Associate Professor, denis-olifir@yandex.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Hladkyi A. V., Olifir D. I. Ontology of Landscape and Complex Categories in Spatial Synergy // Humanitarian Vector. 2020. Vol. 15, No. 2. PP. 111–120. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-2-111-120. 120 Гуманитарный вектор. 2020. Т. 15, № 2 Гуманитарная география и философия трансграничья |
| Section | HUMAN GEOGRAPHY AND PHILOSOPHY OF TRANSBOUNDEDNESS |
| UDK | 168.1 |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2020-15-2-111-120 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | In the system paradigm, landscape theory and complex theory fall under the concept of a system characterized by a set of elements that are in different relationships. This formulation of the question does not exhaust the depth and diversity of the categories under consideration. In the sum of the elements united by various connections and relations, synergistic effects appear, i. e. new qualities, properties, potentials, additional effects. The novelty of the study lies in the disclosure of synergetic properties of the landscape and the complex in the concept of spatial synergy. Methodological basis of the research: methods of analysis, generalization, ascent from the abstract to the concrete, comparison and modeling. We analyzed the categories of landscape and complex and compared the points of view of leading scientists in various scientific concepts. Within the framework of the system approach, the doctrine of territorial production complexes (TPC) is considered. The features of the concept of socio-geographical complexes (OGC) are revealed. The advantages of the territorial production system (TPS) are revealed. The study showed that the emergence of new qualities and effects is inherent in both natural (landscapes) and socio-economic (complexes) systems. In spatial synergy, aesthetic and medical-improving qualities of the territory are formed, humanistic-figurative meta geography develops. Spatial synergy is realized in large cities, urban agglomerations, and nodes at the expense of metropolitan, agglomeration and nodal effects, respectively; however, within landscapes they are formed at the expense of natural and aesthetic, therapeutic – cultural and civilizational properties; in the virtual synergy of cyberspace – at the expense of its extraterritorial and communicative qualities. |
| Key words | landscape, complex, system approach, spatial synergy, territorial and industrial complex, social and geographical complex, territorial production system |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Gettner, A. Geography, its history, essence and methods. L State publishing house; M: Red proletarian, 1930. (In Rus.) 2. Golubchikov, Y. Human geography. M: URSS editorial, 2003. (In Rus.) 3. Humboldt, A. Pictures of nature. M: Geografgiz, 1959. (In Rus.) 4. Draper, D. W. History of the North American civil war: the Nature and life of America and their relation to the origin of war. St. Petersburg: printing house of M. Khan, 1871. (In Rus.) 5. Draper, D. W. History of the mental development of Europe: in 2 v. Kiev; Kharkiv: South Russian publishing house of F. A. Johanson, 1900. (In Rus.) 6. Zamyatin, D. N., Humanitarian geography. Space and language of geographical images. SPb: Alethea. 2003. (In Rus.) 7. Zamyatin, D. N. Metageography. Space images and images space. M: Agraf, 2004. (In Rus.) 8. Isachenko, A. G. landscape Studies and physical and geographical zoning: Studies. M: No. SHK., 1991. (In Rus.) 9. Kolosovsky, N. N. On the question of economic zoning. Problems of Economics, pp. 36–52, no. 1, 1941. (In Rus.) 10. Palamarchuk, M. M. Territorial structure of industrial complexes. Kiev, 1981. (In Rus.) 11. Preobrazhensky, V. S. What do geographers argue about? M: Knowledge. 1990. (In Rus.) 12. Grodzinsky, M. D., Savitskaya, O. V. Aesthetics of landscape. Kyiv: Publishing and printing center “Kyiv University”, 2005. (In Ukr.) 13. Grodzinsky, M. D. Cognition of landscape: place and space: monograph. In 2 vol. Kyiv: Publishing and printing center “Kyiv University”. Vol. 2005. (In Ukr.) 14. Denisik, G. I. Anthropogenic landscapes of right-bank Ukraine: monograph. Vinnitsa: Arbat, 1998. (In Ukr.) 15. Ishchuk, S. I., Gladkiy, O. V. Theoretical bases of territorial-industrial system formation. Modern problems of development of geographical science and education in Ukraine: materials of the V all-Ukrainian scientific-practical conference (Kiev, November 26–28, 2015) / Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv: Horizonte, 2015: 27–29. (In Ukr.) 16. Ishchuk, S. I., Shparaga, T. I., Hladkiy, O. V. Split geography. Scientific notes of Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University named after Mikhail Kotsyubinsky, pp. 5–8, no. 6, 2003. (In Ukr.) 17. Kosterin, V. O. Synergetic effect of large cities. Economics, finance, law, pp. 11–13. no. 4, 2000. (In Ukr.) 18. Pistun, M. D. Fundamentals of the theory of social geography. Kyiv: Higher school, 1994. (In Ukr.) |
| Full article | Ontology of Landscape and Complex Categories in Spatial Synergy |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
