| Annotation |
Keen interest in studying of neighboring states has always remained a vital problem for several reasons:
the protection of the state from invasions, the defense of independence and territorial integrity, the establishment
of diplomatic contacts and trade relations, the development of cultural ties. Walled by the Great Wall, China developed
and went its own way. Isolation from outside world, the harsh climate, the natural environment – all has
affected the national character. Nowadays the consideration of value orientations, norms of behavior, system of
education, understanding and appropriate application of accumulated knowledge in the process of intercultural
contact continues to be an important problem, the solution of which is to explore Chinese society by overcoming
the Great Wall. At first sight, the stability of Chinese culture is perceived as conservative. However, its paradoxicality
is manifested in the ability to accept new trends, to reply the challenges of today, preserving the samples
and norms, that have evolved and passed on to the next generation for centuries. Adherence to traditions can be
seen in behavior, everyday life, interpersonal relationships, affects all spheres of society. The Chinese belong to
another civilization, they have a different system of views, attitude to reality, a certain type of thinking, non-verbal
means of communication, language picture of the world, humor. This article discusses the national traits of
Chinese character in the context of the key provisions of philosophical and cultural analysis ‒ which can help to
prevent conflict situations, avoid misunderstandings in communication |
| References |
1.Van Ian Ian. Traditions of family education in China. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities &
Sciences, no. 43–2, pp. 54–57, 2007. (In Rus.)
2. Glagolev, V. S. Religious and ethnic filling of images of “one’s own” and “someone else’s” in the dynamics
of political opportunism. Dialogue cultures and partnership of civilizations. XIV international Likhachevsky
scientific readings. Proceedings of the Conference. Saint Petersburg: 15–20 May 2014: Sankt-Peterburgskii
Gumanitarnyi universitet profsoiuzov, 2014: 362–365 (In Rus.)
3. Zheludova, N. F. Empathy in interpersonal and intergroup communication in contemporary society.
Lawand Governance. 21st Century, no. 1, pp. 66–68, 2012. (In Rus.).
4. Maliavin, V. V. Chinese ethnos, or the gift of peace. Ivanovo, Roshcha, 2016. (In Rus.)
5. Medvedeva, S. M. National and cultural identity and a diplomat’s personality. Law and Governance. 21st
Century, no. 4, pp. 32–34, 2011. (In Rus.)
6. Panfilova, T. V., Samarin, A. N., Zheludova, N. F. Social empathy in intercultural communication perspective.
Konfliktologia, no. 4, pp. 262–281, 2016. (In Rus.)
7. Sidikhmenov, V.Ya. China: pages of the past. Smolensk, Rusich, 2010. (In Rus.)
8. Silant’eva, M. V. Communication as a Way to Broadcast an Intentional Experience of Local Cultures.
Scientific research and development. Modern communication studies, no. 4, pp. 49–55, 2016. (In Rus.)
9. Silant’eva, M. V. Metamorphosis of Social Organisms in Light of Transformation of Cultural Boundaries:
Global Consequences of Modernization Processes. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 6, pp. 206–
210, 2012. (In Rus.)
10. Silant’eva, M. V., Glagolev, V. S., Tarasov, B. N. Philosophy of crosscultural communication. International
Trends, no. 2, pp. 64–76, 2017. (In Rus.)
11. Speshnev, N. A. The Chinese: features of national psychology. Saint Petersburg, KARO, 2014. (In Rus.)
12. Sukhomlinova, V. V. Alternative collectivism: inner characteristics of the traditional Chinese society.
Manuscript, no. 9, pp. 93–99, 2018. (In Rus.).
13. Tan Aoshuan. Chinese picture of the world: the language, the culture, the mentality. Moscow, Jazyki
slavjanskoj kultury, 2004. (In Rus.)
14. Aneas, María Assumpta, Sandín, María Paz Intercultural and Cross-Cultural Communication Research:
Some Reflections about Culture and Qualitative Methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, no. 10, art. 51,
2009. Web. 30.04.2020 http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1251. DOI: http://dx.doi.
org/10.17169/fqs-10.1.1251 (In Engl.)
15. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., Minkov, M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: intercultural
cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: McGraw Hill, 2010. (In Engl.)
16. Nangyeon Lim Cultural differences in emotion: differences in emotional arousal level between the East
and the West // Integrative Medicine Research, no. 5, pp. 105–109, 2016. DOI 10.1016 /j.imr.2016.03.004 (In
Engl.)
17. Teodorescu, A. Intercultural communication patterns and language use in computer mediatedcommunication.
Studii si Cercetari Filologice: Seria Limbi Straine Aplicate, no. 11, pp. 247–253, 2012. (In Engl.)
18. Yi Wang, Su Lu, Jia Liu, Jiahui Tan, Juyuan Zhang The Influence of Culture on Attitudes Towards Humorous
Advertising. Frontiers in Psychology, no. 10, pp. 1–12, 2019. DOI 10.3389 /fpsyg.2019.01015 (In Engl.) |
