Annotation |
The article considers how the rapid spread of the new coronavirus COVID-19 caused transformations in the field of media, in particular in regional journalism, using the example of a specific region ‒ the Republic of Mordovia. The purpose of the study is to study the features of changing the media agenda in the context of the spread of coronavirus, the specifics of the information in the regional media, and also the response of the audience of various types of publications. During the study, general scientific methods were used, such as systemic and structural-functional, as well as empirical ones. The continuous sampling method analyzed about 2,000 materials posted on several information resources ‒ communities of large regional mass media of the VKontakte social network. A qualitative analysis of the content of materials on the coronavirus from January to mid-May 2020 was carried out. At the same time, the coefficient of people’s involvement in the selected publication (ERpost) was analyzed. In the work, the author supplemented the list of groups into which media information about coronavirus can be divided, the situation with fakes was analyzed, three categories of sources were identified for the reliability of the information posted in them: official information of government bodies, relevant ministries, officials; mass media; social networks and Telegram channels. A study of materials on the topic of coronavirus in regional media revealed the following trends: the number of materials on coronavirus and the audience’s response to them have grown since the onset of the disease, but in May there was a general downward trend (this proves that for all the social significance of the topic, it is impossible to keep the audience’s attention at the same level for a long time); the involvement of the audience is consistently higher for materials affecting regional subjects; auditoria interests lose out to public needs, therefore, official reports are viewed more than celebrity messages, and O. Markin, the Minister of Health of the Republic, became the main media person; despite the prohibitions and the negative attitude towards clickbait, it continues to be used, including in materials on the theme of coronavirus; “hate speech” is practically not used by regional publications.
|
References |
1. Baranova, N. A. Discursive analysis of the situation of attempt (based on German online media). Humanitarian Scientific Bulletin, no. 3, pp. 127–133, 2020. (In Rus.)
2. Begun, V. V. Vulgarity and “naive cynicism” as the destructive qualities of a journalistic text. Ethics of Speech Behavior of a Russian Journalist. Sankt-Peterburg: Asterion, 2009: 268. (In Rus.)
3. Bogdanov, A. Udalenka brings OSes closer together: as the coronavirus influenced the management of its own fleet of timber trucks in Russia. Logistics, no. 3, pp. 8, 2020. (In Rus.)
4. Buldakova, A. A. The effect of coronavirus on the Russian economy. Bulletin of scientific conferences, no. 2/2, pp. 32–34, 2020 (In Rus.)
5. Dement’eva, K. V. Mediam and his role in the formation of a multi-ethnic society. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, no. 53, pp. 257–279, 2018. (In Rus.)
6. Dement’eva, K. V. The problem of terrorism: media coverage, counteraction in the information environment (for example, media texts for 2017). Transactions of the Institute of Business Communications. Sankt-Peterburg, 2017: 28–32. (In Rus.)
7. Dzyaloshinskiy, I. M. Media space of Russia: communication strategies of social institutions. M: APK i PPRO, 2013: 479. (In Rus.)
8. Karasik, V. I. Epidemic in the mirror of media discourse: facts, assessments, positions. Political Linguistics, no. 2, pp. 25–34, 2020. (In Rus.)
9. Kuatova, G. A., Zhanabaev, D.Zh. Physical activity as protection against coronavirus. Actual scientific research in the modern world, no. 2–4, pp. 88–91, 2020. (In Rus.)
10. Musaeva, G. Influence of the “coronacrisis” on the development of global and regional socio-economic processes. Modern Education: Topical Issues, Achievements, and Innovations: Collection of articles of the XXXV International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2020: 32–34. (In Rus.)
11. Nikolaeva, A. V. Clickbait in the media. Russian Speech, no. 3, pp. 43–47, 2018. (In Rus.)
12. Pashchenkov M. V., Haitov, M. R. The immune response against epidemic coronaviruses. Immunology, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 2020. (In Rus.)
13. Savinov, Yu. A., Kirillov, V. N., Taranovskaya, E. V. Urgent Issue: The Impact of the Chinese Coronavirus on the World Economy and Trade. International Economics, no. 2, pp. 63–71, 2020. (In Rus.)
14. Samartsev, O. R., Latenkova, V. M., Fokina, D. S. Typological characteristics of clickbait in the heading block of modern mass media. Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Philology, no. 1, pp. 155–163, 2020. (In Rus.)
15. Sekletsova, E. M. The effect of coronavirus on the world economy. Bulletin of scientific conferences, no. 3/1, pp. 97–101, 2020. (In Rus.)
16. Semenova, E. A. New urban media and their impact on social and family values (on the example of the work of the Tambov media during the COVID-19 pandemic). Bulletin of modern studies, no. 1/1, pp. 87–91, 2020. (In Rus.)
17. Semenova, E. A. Fake news on the urban media field during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic (using the example of the Tambov media). Scientific and practical research, no. 5/3, pp. 62–65, 2020. (In Rus.)
18. Starostina, U. V. Analysis of the epidemiological situation of the COVID-19 pandemic based on materials from the coastal media. Meridian, no. 11, pp. 24–26, 2020. (In Rus.)
19. Batooli, Z., Sayyah, M. Measuring social media attention of scientific research on Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): An investigation on article-level metrics data of Dimensions. Web. 15. 05. 2020. Research Square. 2020. URL: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-21980/v1 (In Engl.)
20. The Media and their Informative Role in the Face of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID19): Validation of Fear Perception and Magnitude of the Issue (MED–COVID-19) // / C. R. Mejia, D. Ticona, J. F. Rodriguez-Alarcon [et al.] Electronic Journal of General Medicine, no. 17, pp. 239, 2020. (In Engl.) |