| Annotation |
The article examines the problem of modernization and the formation of new cultural institutions of the 21st century on the materials of the formation of media games on the Internet. The actual practice of expanding the game fields deserves attention from researchers for various reasons. First, the game is interesting in itself as a cultural phenomenon that had arisen in the history of humanity before culture itself, then entered into it and became an integral part of social practices. Second, during revolutionary technological changes in the field of the information interaction of people and the emergence of the so-called digital environment, games known to humanity turn from a class of physical and mental exercises into imagination games based on the technical power of computer devices and network communications. The nomenclature of games is expanding, their genre diversity is growing, the design is being fortified; games content is differentiated and deepened, their mythology is being formed. Thus, the “digital” space of our time is in the stage of continuous shaping. Its architectonics predetermines the formation on the Internet of the institution of the game as a newly-formed one, among the formation factors of which the decisive ones stand out – media and mythogenesis. Media determines a qualitatively different state of historically known game formats, while mythogenesis contributes to the accelerated institutionalization of the media games in the social practices. The study of the problems is based on the results of the work of the researchers on the social significance of the game in the “digital” space of the 21st century and the content analysis of the media games by their types. In this study, the formation of media games as the cultural intitution of the “digital” sphere is established. The functioning of the new formation takes place in the conditions and conventions of unlimited time and space.
|
| References |
1. Bern, E. Games that people play: the psychology of human relationships. Tr. from English. M: Eksmo, 2008. (In Rus.)
2. Volkova, I. I. Game as a backbone phenomenon of screen communications. Dr. sci. diss. M., 2015. (In Rus.)
3. Grindstaff, L. “Real television” and the policy of social control. Mass culture: modern Western studies. Tr. from English. M: Fond nauchnykh issledovanii «Pragmatika kul’tury», 2005: 76–90. (In Rus.)
4. Zabiyako, A. P. Computer technologies as a factor of religious transformations.Value discourse in sciences and theology. M: IFRAN, 2009: 176–181. (In Rus.)
5. Eagleton, T. The Idea of Culture. Tr. from English. M: Izd. dom VShE, 2019. (In Rus.)
6. Ilchenko, S. N. Gamerization as an Industry: Dangers of Parallel Reality. Social Media as a Resource of Integrated Communicative Practices. Chelyabinsk: Izd. tsentr IuUrGU, 2017: 126–169. (In Rus.)
7. Camus, A. The Myth of Sisyphus. Essays on the absurd. Twilight of the gods. Tr. from English. M: Politizdat, 1990: 222–318. (In Rus.)
8. Lotman, Yu. M. Myth – name – culture. Yu. M. Lotman. Semiosphere. SPb.: Iskusstvo–SPB, 2000: 525–543. (In Rus.)
9. McLuhan, G. M. Understanding Media: External Extensions of Man. Tr. from English. M: Giperboreia, Kuchkovo pole, 2007. (In Rus.)
10. Malinova, O. Yu. Current past: The symbolic policy of the ruling elite and the dilemmas of Russian identity. M: Politich. entsiklopediia, 2015. (In Rus.)
11. Manheim, K. Man and society in the era of transformation. Karl Manheim. The diagnosis of our time. Tr. from from German and English. M: Iurist, 1994: 277–411. (In Rus.)
12. Marcuse, G. One-dimensional man. The study of the ideology of the Developed Industrial Society. Tr. from English. M: “REFL-book”, 1994. (In Rus.)
13. Pukhova, T. I. Classification of games for adults according to Roger Kayua. Web.16.06.2020. http://www.anthropology.ru/ru/text/puhova-ti/klassifikaciya-igr-dlya-vzroslyh-soglasno-rozhe-kayua. (In Rus.)
14. Sidorov, V. A. Genuine or “digital imaginary”? Cultural institutions in the media. Humanitarian vector, no. 5, pp. 68–76, 2019. (In Rus.)
15. Stepin, V. S. The prospects of civilization: from the cult of power to dialogue and harmony. Ethical thought: Scientific journalist. reading. 1991. M: Respublika, 1992: 182–199. (In Rus.)
16. Willock, David Everett. Reality as a subject of negotiations: chaotic attractors of our understanding. Mass culture: modern Western studies / Tr. from English. M: Fond nauchnykh issledovanii ”Pragmatika kul’tury”, 2005: 20–41. (In Rus.)
17. Heyzing, J. Homo Ludens. In the shadow of tomorrow / per. with the netherlands. M: OOO ”Izd-vo AST”, 2004. (In Rus.)
18. Eliade, M. Aspects of myth. Tr. from fr. M: Akademicheskii proekt, 2014. (In Rus.)
19. Gillmor, D. We the Media: grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People. Publisher: O¢Reilly Media, 2004. (In Engl.)
20. Iser, W. The Fictive and the Imaginary. Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993. (In Engl.)
21. Morris, M. and Ogan, C. The Internet as Mass Medium. Journal of Communication, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1996. (In Engl.)
22. Namelinkm, C. James Halloran Memorial Lecture. Conversations with my Robot. Nordicom Review, vol. 30, June, jubilee issue, pp. 218–223, 1996. (In Engl.)
23. Sandvik, K., Thorhange, A. Professor Nukem. Communication Research in the Age of the Experience Economy. Nordicom Review, no. 2, pp. 177–192, 2008. (In Engl.) |
