| Annotation |
The article examines the socio-cultural conditions, mechanisms and prerequisites for the development of
patriotism, analyzes the contradictory forms of its development and studies the disintegration processes on the
part of the authorities and society that prevent the formation of a unified concept of the philosophy of patriotism in
modern society. The work shows a dynamic portrait of residents of the Siberian Federal District through the prism
of assessments of the patriotic, as well as the conditions and prospects for its development in the future. More and
less patriotic subjects of the Siberian Federal District have been identified. On the basis of this, the cognitive, affective,
activity components of the basic conditions for the development of the philosophy of patriotism and, in general,
the consolidation of society were revealed. The subjective conditions for constructing a relationship to the territory
where a person lives and the objective indicators of its development in the present and in the future are disclosed.Using the example of empirical research, it is proved that the patriotic component is then strong and actively introduced in everyday life and on the ideological state level, when among residents of different subjects of the Russian Federation there is a single field for the perception of their Motherland, Fatherland, Earth. The category of ideal patriotism is replaced by real everyday practice – love and duty towards your country. |
| References |
1.
Karmadonov, O. A., Zverev, M. K. Consolidation of Russian society: flows and obstacles). Irkutsk: Izd-vo IGU, 2012. (In Rus.)
2.
Karmadonov, O. A., Kovrigina, G. D. Conjunctive potential of civic activity and state initiatives). Sotsial’naya konsolidatsiya i sotsial’noye vosproizvodstvo sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva: resursy, problemy, i perspektivy. Proceedings of the Conference Title. Irkutsk: Izd-vo IGU, pp. 6–13, 2017. (In Rus.)
3.
Karmadonov, O. A., Kovrigina, G. D. Conjunctive potential of space and civilization. Sotsiodinamika, no 3. pp. 73–85, 2016. (In Rus.)
4.
Karmadonov, O. A., Kovrigina, G. D. Social conjunction in the resource aspect. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii, no. 2(17), pp. 12–28, 2016. (In Rus.)
5.
Korzhov, G. Territorial identities: conceptual interpretations in modern foreign sociological thought. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing, no. 1, pp. 105–122, 2010. (In Rus.)
6.
Polyushkevich, O. A. Ideological resources of sociocultural solidarity. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik, no. 64, pp. 217–230, 2017. (In Rus.)
7.
Polyushkevich, O. A. Solidarity of generations. Irkutsk, Izd-vo IGU, 2014. (In Rus.)
8.
Polyushkevich, O. A., Popova, M. V. Symbolic construction of territorial identity (on the example of toponymy of Irkutsk)). Urbanistika, no. 3, pp. 117–134, 2017. (In Rus.)
9.
Popova, M. V. Socio-political landmark of the territorial brand). Izvestiya IGU. Seriya Politologiya. Religiovedeniy, vol. 22, no. 64, pp. 203–211, 2017. (In Rus.)
10.
Skobelev, K. V. The study of Siberian regional identity in modern Russian historiography. Vestnik IGPI im. P. P. Yershova, no. 1(2), pp. 106–109, 2012. (In Rus.)
11.
Skudenkov, V. A. Economic claims of urban residents of the Irkutsk region. Urbanistika, no. 3, pp. 93–105, 2017. (In Rus.)
12.
Fedotova, N. G. Territorial identity as a symbolic resource of the region. Vestnik Novgorodskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, no. 90, pp. 105–108, 2015. (In Rus.)
13.
Shmatko, N. A., Kachanov, Yu. L. Territorial identity as a subject of sociological research. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, no. 4, pp. 94–101, 1998. (In Rus.) |
