| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Cultural Centrism in the Study of Quality of Life |
| Authors | Shchetkina I.A. Candidate of Sociology, Associate Professor, irinasocio@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | CULTURE AND SOCIETY |
| UDK | 304 |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2018-13-2-52-59 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | Social changes determined by social development affect the formation and change the social values and human needs. This changes the orientations of the social world outlook, which is aimed at finding solutions for improving the quality of life and modernization of material and spiritual culture of the society. The integrative culture centered approach proves that there is a dialectical unity between quality of life and culture, namely that the development of quality of life occurs according to the scheme: cultural innovations meet resistance at the level of everyday culture, contains the primary life-support program. However, their subsequent interaction leads to the formation of a new quality of life. The main aspect, which draws attention in cultural concepts of quality of life, is culture of quality of life. It is a cultural heritage of the nation which includes elements of spiritual and material culture, together forming integrative culture centered unity. Quality of life in the context of cultural centrism is a component of culture which supports society and man, it is understood as cultural wealth. The role of culture in the context of cultural centrism is that it organizes, gives dynamics and the symbolic meaning of those events that happen in people’s lives and characterize its quality. |
| Key words | quality of life, culture, cultural centrism, values, cultural universals |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Baller, E. A., Zlobin, N. S., Mezhuev, V. M. Culture – people – philosophy: the problem of integration and development. Voprosy filosofii, no. 1, pp. 36, 1982. (In Rus.) 2. Bobkov, V. M., Maslovskiy-Mstislavskiy P. S. Quality of life: concepts and measurement. M: VCUZH, 1998. (In Rus.) 3. Veber, M. Political works (1895–1919). M: Praksis, 2003. (In Rus.) 4. Dudek, S. H. “Nomadic memory” – the methodological experience of learning the oral history of indigenous communities of the Arctic. Semiotika edinstva i ehtnokul’turnogo mnogoobraziya istoricheskogo prostranstva Russkogo Severa, no. 8, pp. 41–53, 2015. (In Rus.) 5. Kogan, L. N. The full development of personality and culture (spiritual and moral aspects of the formation of the new man). M: Znanie, 1983. (In Rus.) 6. Culture matters. How Values Shape Human Progress. M: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskih issledovanij, 2002. (In Rus.) 7. Likhachev, D. S. Conversations about yesterday, today and tomorrow. M: Sov. Rossiya, 1988. (In Rus.) 8. Malikov, N. S. The question of the content of the concept of “quality of life” and its measurement. The Standard of living of the population of the regions of Russia, no. 2, p. 4, 2002.(In Rus.) 9. Malinovskiy, B. Magic. Science. Religion. M: Refl-buk, 1998. (In Rus.) 10. Nizhnikov, S. A. The problem of the spiritual in Western and Eastern culture and philosophy. M: NIC Infra- M, 2012. (In Rus.) 11. Tokvil’, A. The old regime and the revolution. SPb: Aletejya, 2008. (In Rus.) 12. Harrison, L. Jews, Confucians, and Protestants: Cultural Capital and the End of Multiculturalism. M: Mysl’, 2014. (In Rus.) 13. Alexander, J. C. The Civil Sphere. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. (In Engl.) 14. Harrison, L. The Central Liberal Truth: How Politics Can Change a Culture and Save It from Itself. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. Table 2.1. (In Engl.) 15. Herskowits, М. I. Cultural Anthropology. New York: A. Knopf, 1952. (In Engl.) 16. Huntington, S. Р. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996. (In Engl.) |
| Full article | Cultural Centrism in the Study of Quality of Life |
| 0 | |
| 18 | |
