| Annotation |
This article reviews the attempt to study the notion of alternativity in various fields of knowledge. This generalization is necessary for classifying alternativity as a phenomenon. This will give researchers further boost in the studies of alternative media. The research of alternative media has been carried out for more than 5 years by the Academy of Media Industry and the media department of HSE University in Moscow. Alternativity is understood by the author as the necessity of choice between several ways that sometimes contradict one another. The author reviews philosophic concepts and elements of alternativity in modern science. Special attention is paid to the issues of alternativity in history, linguistics and natural science. During the analysis the focus is held on the works by J. Habermas and other researchers that viewed the opportunity to create communicative rationale through the elements of various opposing theories which is important for the media analysis. This aims to trace models and principles that could be useful to analyze modern alternative media in online environment. After the analysis of alternative components from various fields of science the author determines key factors that influence the formation of the personal alternative behavior. Here are some of them: the choice to differentiate between correct and false statements, acquiring its own experience through reasoning, the desire for a constant interaction with the people in various forms on various topics, the use of the successful innovations from various scientific concepts, the use of elements that change personal behavior, the desire to relax and seek freedom in alternative virtual word, the necessity to look for new knowledge, facts, figures in the ever-changing environment. |
| References |
1.
Andryuschenko, V. M. Сoncepts and structure of the machine fund of the Russian Language. M: Nauka, 1989. (In Rus.)
2.
Asmolov, A. G. Psychology of the personality: cultural and historic understanding of the man. М: Акаdemiia, Smysl, 2007. (In Rus.)
3.
Bestuzhev-Lada, I. V. Retrogealternatisticis in the history of philosophy Philosophy questions, no. 8, pp. 112–121, 1997. (In Rus.)
4.
Biryukov, V. А. The use of technology of augmented reality during the audit of the media content. М., 2016. Web. 15.06.2020. http://www.izron.ru/articles/ (In Rus.)
5.
Boguslavskiy, I. М. Annotated corpus of the Russian texts: concept, mapping, types of information. Papers of International Seminar of Computer Linguistics and its applications “Dialog-2000”. Protvino, 2000. (In Rus.)
6.
Bocharov, A. B. Alternative history in the context of natural science paradigm. Figures of history or common places of historiography. St. Petersburg readings on theory, methodology and philosophy of the history. SPb: Izd-vo ‘Severnaya zvezda’, 2005. (In Rus.)
7.
Vernigorova, V. A. Translations of realities as objects of cross-cultural communications. Young scientist, no. 3, pp. 184–186, 2010. (In Rus.)
8.
Diogen Laertsky. On life, teachings and the words of modern philosophers. М: Mysl, 1979. (In Rus.)
9.
Zakharov, V. P. Compatibility through the prism of corpus. Web. 20.06.2020.http://www.dialog-21.ru/media/2138/zakharov.pdf (In Rus.)
10.
Kazennov, A. S. Dialectics as an ultimate cognition method. Spb: Izd-vo Polytechnicheskogo universiteta, 2011. (In Rus.)
11.
Classification of alternative history in creative activities. Web.10.06.2020. https://www.alternativa.lib.ru/ah/subject/ai_questions/index.htm (In Rus.)
12.
Collingwood, R. The idea of history. Autobiography. М: Nayka, 1980. (In Rus.)
13.
Lemm, S. The sun of technology. Web. 25.06.2020. http://www.lib.ru/LEM/summa/summcont.htm (In Rus.)
14.
Plungyan, V. А. Corpus as an instrument and ideology: on some lessons of modern corpus linguistics. Russian language in scientific coverage, no. 2, pp. 7–20, 2008. (In Rus.)
15.
Haidegger, M. The basic notions of metaphysics. Philosophy questions, no. 9, pp. 116–163, 1989. (In Rus.)
16.
Cherepanova, V. S., Nazarevich, O. S. Methods of alternative communication during the work with children with autism spectrum disorder. Kontsept, t. 39, pp. 336–340, 2017 (In Rus.)
17.
Yaroshevski, М. G. Subject activity as a foundation of psychology system.Psychology issues, no. 1, pp. 159–162, 1984. (In Rus.)
18.
Collingwood. R. An Essay on Metaphysics. Oxford, 1940. (In Engl.)
19.
Habermas, J. Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995. Vol. 1. (In Engl.)
20.
Leech, G. The State of the Art in Corpus Linguistics. Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, ed. by Aijmer Karin & Bengt Altenberg, London & New York, Longman, 1991: 8–29. (In Engl.)
21.
Storsul, T., Krumsvik, A. H. What is media innovation?. 2013. Web.10.06.2020. https://www.academia.edu/4732092/What_is_Media_Innovation. (In Engl.) |
