| Annotation |
The relevance of the article is due to the increasing importance of the regional security factor in modern
conditions, where the level of regional self-awareness and the desire for relative autonomy are growing within
the framework of the general process of developing the security system. The article is devoted to the analysis
of the security concepts existing in the history of philosophy in order to identify the evolution of ideas about “regional
security”. The study uses comparative, systemic and hermeneutic methods, the action of which is aimed
at identifying aspects of regional security in texts devoted to the problems of state, national and public security.
The novelty of the research is associated with the development of the idea of the evolution of ideas about regional
security from abstract ideas to various aspects of regional practice. The result of the study is evidence that,
being originally one of the aspects of general management theory, the ideas of regional security at the end of the
twentieth century became the core of the concept of “regional security complexes”. The next result was the substantiation
that modern criticism of this concept is the basis of the theoretical constructions of regional security in
the 21st century, which are based on a synthesis of ideas about the need to adopt rules adopted by states that
support the stability of world security and the influence of regions with their own interests. The conclusion of the
study is to assert that modern concepts of regional security are based on the synthesis of methodologies of the
systemic and constructivist approaches. This methodology is used to substantiate the assertion that any state
is forced to deal with the security problems of its regions, to pay attention to the existing threats and regional
interests in them, which may be of a constructive nature and may pose a real danger associated with challenges
from the political, economic, military, environmental, and social spheres. |
| References |
1. Gobbs, T. Essays. M: Mysl’, 1991. Vol. 2. (In Rus.)
2. Hegel, G. W. F. Philosophy of law. M: Nauka, 1979. (In Rus.)
3. Lazarevsky, N. I. Autonomy: monograph. SPb: Tipolitogr. A. G. Rosen, 1906. (In Rus.)
4. Chicherin, B. N. The course of the state of science. General state law. Ch. 1. M., 1894: 16–18. (In Rus.)
5. Lenin, V. I. “Left-Wing” Communism: An Infantile Disorder. Complete collection of works in 55 vol. 5-E.
M: Publishing House of Political literature, 1967. Vol. 41: 27–51. (In Rus.)
6. Zagryatskov, M. D. What is municipal socialism? M: Nachalo, 1917. (In Rus.)
7. Kunts, G., O’Donnel, S. Management: system and situational analysis of management functions. M:
Progress, 1981. Vol. 1. (In Rus.)
8. Habermas, Ju. Moral consciousness and communicative action. M: Nauka, 2000. (In Rus.)
9. Jones, R. W. Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1999. (In Engl.)
10. Foucault, M. Managing yourself and others. SPb: Nauka, 2011. (In Rus.)
11. Agamben, G. State of Exception. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2005. (In Engl.)
12. Buzan, B., Waever, O. Powers and Regions. The Structure of International Security. Cambridge, 2002.
(In Engl.)
13. Ayoob, M. Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism.
International Studies Review, no. 3, pp. 27–48, 2020. (In Engl.)
14. Lake, D. A. Hierarchy in international relations. London: Cornell University Press, 2011. (In Engl.)
15. Jervis, R. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, vol. 2, pp. 67–214, 1978. (In Engl.)
16. Nyman J. What is the value of security? Contextualizing the negative/positive debate. Review of
International Studies, no. 42, pp. 521–839, 2016. (In Engl.)
17. Aniche, E. T. From Pan-Africanism to African regionalism: a Chronicle. African studies, no. 1, pp. 70–87,
2020. (In Engl.)
18. Beeson, M., Lee-Brown T. The Future of Asian Regionalism: Not What It Used to Be. Asia & the Pacific
Policy Studies, no. 2, pp. 195–206., 2016. (In Engl.)
19. Acharya, A. The End of the American World Order. Cambridge: Polity, 2018. (In Engl.)
20. Coe, B. N. Sovereignty in the South Intrusive Regionalism in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia.
Cambridge University Press, 2019. (In Engl.)
21. Cusack, A. K. Venezuela, ALBA, and the Limits of Postneoliberal Regionalism in Latin America and the
Caribbean. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. (In Engl.)
22. Fawcet, t L. Regionalism by Emulation: Considerations across Time and Space. Interregionalism
and the European Union. Post-revisionist Approach to Europe’s Place in a Changing World / Ed. by M. Telo,
L. Fawcett, F. Ponjaert. Abington: Routledge, 2016: 33–55. (In Engl.)
23. Avgustin. O grade Bozhiem. M: ACT, 2000. (In Rus.)
24. Kazakova, M. N. Regional security in the Russian national security system. Regionology, no. 3, pp. 40–
46, 2011. (In Rus.) |
