| Annotation |
The purpose of the article is to identify the originality of the author’s strategy of the Russian-speaking Kazakh
poet B. Kanapyanov as an integral element of the conceptual picture of the world. The scientific novelty of
the work is determined by a systematic approach to the studied material, as well as by the fact that for the first time the author of the article considers the novels of a prose writer in the stated perspective. “Tales of the Old
Combiner” are written in a comic vein, and the genre definition is already given by the title itself. The plots of
small chapters demonstrate the ethical “difference” between ideological slogans and everyday reality in which
rural workers are immersed. The figure of the narrator here is quite remarkable: this is a young man, on the one
hand, who is a product of the Soviet era, and on the other, who has just graduated from an agricultural technical
school in the city and has arrived at a state farm, who does not have much life experience, whose consciousness
is not yet clouded by ideology, and therefore looking at the world ironically and objectively. The Kazakh author
seeks to convey the peculiarities of the laughter outlook of the 1970s–1980s through the use of speech clichés
of the Soviet era. He clearly demonstrates Soviet ideologemes, bordering in meaning, with “carnival misalliance”.
The results of the study showed that the author’s preface, a kind of communication between the author and the
reader through the author’s mask and fairy tale narration, etc., become elements of the author’s strategy of B.
Kanapyanov, placed in a comic narrative discourse. The latter unfolds in the description of the ironic
impressions
of the protagonist, his dreams, the description of the harvesting of bread, the actions of the labor mentor. Prospects
for further research can be associated with identifying the features of the author’s strategy of B. Kanapyanov
in the story Spray of Champagne, understanding the functional role of comic elements in its construction. |
| References |
1. Bolotnova, N. S. Philological analysis of the text Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo universiteta, 2001. (In Rus.)
2. Os’muhina, O. Yu., Bajkova, S. A. “Secondary Plot of Human Tragicomedy”: Author’s Prose Strategy
Eug. Popov. Saransk: Izd-vo Mordov. un-ta, 2016. (In Rus.)
3. Baikova, S. A. Author’s prose strategy Eug. Popov 1970–1990s.: Cand. sci. diss. abstr. N. Novgorod,
2013. (In Rus.)
4. Dmitrenko, V. A. Formal character of the anecdote text. Bulletin of the International Slavic University.
Khar`kov, no. 4, pp. 63–65, 2000. (In Rus.)
5. Karasik, V. I. Anecdote as a subject of linguistic study. Genres of speech. Saratov: Kolledzh, no. 1,
pp. 144–153, 1997. (In Rus.)
6. Kulinich, M. A. Semantics, structure and pragmatics of English-language humor: Dr. sci. diss. abstr.
Moskva, 2000. (In Rus.)
7. Morozova, A. M. Genre specificity of humorous discourse. Bulletin of the Pushkin Leningrad State
University, no. 1, pp. 216–222. 2013. (In Rus.)
8. Akimova, T. I. Author’s strategy as a literary category: methodological aspect. Philological sciences.
Questions of theory and practice, no. 2, pp. 13–16, 2015. (In Rus.)
9. Grimova, O. A. Narrative intrigue in the novel by Yu. Buida “Blue Blood”. Nratorium, no. 1–2, 2013. Web.
13.05.2021 http://narratorium.rggu.ru/article.html?id=2631078 (In Rus.)
10. Andrianova, M. D. Author’s strategies in the novel prose of A. Bitov: Cand. sci. diss. abstr. SPb., 2011.
(In Rus.)
11. Mal’tseva, T. V. The author’s strategy of self-identification of the hero in the novel by I. A. Goncharov
“Oblomov”. Pushkin readings – 2011. Proceedings of the XVI International Conference “Pushkin Readings”
Sankt-Peterburg. 2011: 287–294. (In Rus.)
12. Kukueva, V. G. The author’s strategy as one of the foundations of the typological description of
V. M. Shukshina. Siberian Journal of Philology, no. 1–2, pp. 23–38, 2006. (In Rus.)
13. Os’muhina, O.Yu. Specificity of the author’s representation in “Sentimental Stories” by M. Zoshchenko
(based on the story “Apollo and Tamara”). Bulletin of the Pushkin Leningrad State University, no. 3, pp. 33–43,
2009. (In Rus.)
14. Pchelkina, T. R. The problem of author’s self-expression in literary criticism: history and prospects of
study. Modern higher school: innovative aspect. Chelyabinsk, no. 1, pp. 23–26, 2012. (In Rus.)
15. Rotai, E. M. “New realism” in modern Russian prose: the artistic worldview of R. Senchin, Z. Prilepin,
S. Shargunov: Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Krasnodar, 2013. (In Rus.)
16. Shukurov, D. L. The concept of author’s strategies in the discourse of Russian ego-futurism. Bulletin of
the Ivanovo State Energy University, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2007. (In Rus.)
17. Chueva, N. S. An artist on the high seas, or On the author’s strategies. Actual problems of social
communication. Materials of the III All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny
Novgorod State Technical University named after Alekseeva, 2012: 575–576. (In Rus.)
18. Yankelevich, M. S. Reflection of the author’s personality in a work of art. Izvestia of the Samara
Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, humanitarian, biomedical sciences. Samara,
no. 2–1, pp. 163–168, 2013. (In Rus.)
19. Karaulov, Yu. N. Russian language and linguistic personality. M: Izdatel’stvo LKI, 2010. (In Rus.)
20. Apresyan, Yu. D. Selected works in 2 volumes. Vol. II: Integral description of language and systemic
lexicography. M: Shkola “Yazyki russkoj kul’tury”, 1995: 348–385. (In Rus.)
21. Popova, Z. D., Sternin, I. A. Language and national picture of the world. Voronezh: “Istoki”, 2002. (In
Rus.)
22. Lihachev, D. S. Logical analysis of language. Cultural concepts. M: 1991: 280–287. (In Rus.)
23. Stepanov, Yu. S. Constants. Dictionary of Russian culture. Research experience. M., 1997: 40–43. (In
Rus.)
24. Krasnyh, V. V. From concept to text and back. On the question of the psycholinguistics of the text. Bulletin
of Moscow University, no. 1, pp. 53–70, 1998. (In Rus.) |
