Annotation |
The relevance of the research is due to the fact that under the influence of the relativistic axiological paradigm,
traditional humanistic values are “tested” in mass media discourse, and the irrelevance for the modern mass
consciousness is constantly verified. Such tendencies are manifested in the existence of a specific agenda, in
which fears and phobias are accumulated in relation to the existing type of culture and moral and ethical norms.
The paper presents a modern and unique empirical material the discourse of regional media, which represents
the mechanisms of verification of values and the impossible transformation in the conditions of a pandemic, which
determines the novelty of the study. The problem of studying the value picture is related to the role of the media
in the formation of phobias and fears, or, on the contrary, in the elimination. Thus, the mass media are forced to
report traumatic events, that is, events that violate the social norm, as a result, a traumatic-phobic segment of the
information picture is constructed, which allows us to establish the demanded value dominants. The purpose of
the work is to identify the regularities of the construction of the traumatic-phobic discourse of the regional mass
media, which presents threats to the norm, the basic values of Russian society. The following methods are used
in the work: discourse analysis, concept analysis and narrative analysis of journalistic publication sat the regional
level that verbalize the concept of “phobia”. The results of the study confirmed the hypothesis put forward: in the
regional mass media discourse, the object of which is traumatic events, there are fears and phobias associated
with the loss, loss of key humanistic values that should streamline social reality, harmonize social relations,
determine a positive scenario of social life. |
References |
1. Mareeva, S. V. Dynamics of norms and values of Russians. Sociological research, no. 7, pp. 120–130,
2013. (In Rus.)
2. Shubkin, V. N., Klimov, I. A. Social disunity as a phenomenon of mass consciousness. Russia is being
reformed, no. 4, pp. 245–261, 2004. (In Rus.)
3. Twenty years of reforms through the eyes of Russians (the experience of many years of sociological
measurements): analytical report. M: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2011.
Web.17.07.2021. https: //www.isras.ru/analytical_report_twenty_years_reforms.html. (In Rus.)
4. Levitsky, V. A. Freedom and responsibility. “Fundamentals of an organic worldview” and articles on
solidarism. M: Posev, 2003. Web. 17.07.2021. URL: https://litvek.com/br/217655?p=60. (In Rus.)
5. Naumchik, V. N. Axiological relativism: limits of permissible. Mastery online, no. 1 (2), 2015. Web.
18.07.2021. http://ripo.unibel.by/index.php?id=706. (In Rus.)
6. Gyurchinov, M. Axiological relativism and moral nihilism in our era (the unknown fate of unprincipled
world). Literary Journal, no. 34, pp. 150–158, 2014. (In Rus.)
7. Sztompka, P. Social change as a trauma (article one). Sociological research, no. 1, pp. 6–16, 2001. (In
Rus.)
8. Shubina, O. A. Humanistic values in the structure of life orientations of student youth: abstract of the
thesis of the cand. sc. Ekaterinburg, 2008. (In Rus.)
9. Dijk, T. A. van. Language. Cognition. Communication. Blagoveshchensk: I. A. Baudouin de Courtenay
Publishing House, 2000. (In Rus.)
10. Karasik, V. I. The language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. (In
Rus.)
11. Makarov, M. L. Fundamentals of the theory of discourse. M: Gnosis, 2003. (In Rus.)
12. Pecheux, M. Content analysis and the theory of discourse. Quadrature of meaning: the French school
of discourse analysis. M: Progress, 1999: 302–336. (In Rus.)
13. Sériot, P. How texts are reading France. Quadrature of meaning: the French school of discourse
analysis. M: Progress, 1999: 12–53. (In Rus.)
14. Foucault, M. The order of discourse: a lecture. Humanities Library. Web. 19.07.2021. https: //gtmarket.
ru/library/articles/777 (In Rus.)
15. Vorkachev, S. G. The concept of happiness in the Russian language consciousness: the experience of
linguistic and cultural analysis. Krasnodar: Kuban State Technological University, 2002. (In Rus.)
16. Еyerman, R. Cultural trauma and collective memory. New literary Review, no. 5, pp. 40–67, 2016. (In
Rus.)
17. Alexander, J. Cultural trauma and collective identity. Sociological Journal, no. 3, pp. 6–40, 2012. (In
Rus.)
18. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press,
2004. 304 р. (In Engl.)
19. Alexander, J. C. On the Social Construction of Moral Universals: The “Holocaust” from War Crime to
Trauma Drama. Cultural trauma and collective identity. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2004: 196–263.
(In Engl.)
20. Eyerman, R. Cultural Trauma and Collective Memory. Eyerman R. Cultural Trauma: Slavery and the
Formation of African American Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001: 1–22. (In Engl.)
21. Antropova, V. V. Conceptualization of fears and phobias in the discourses of regional mass media: on
the methodology of the question. Proceedings of the Ural Federal University. Problems of education, science and
culture, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2021. (In Rus.)
22. Antropova, V. V. Cognitive mechanisms of conceptualization of phobias in the discourse of information
portals of the region with increased technogenic and sociogenic risks. Media in the modern world. 60th
St. Petersburg readings: materials of the International Scientific Forum. St. Petersburg, 2021. Web. 17.07.2021.
https://smif.spbu.ru/images/2021-thesis/Sidorov/Сидоров_Антропова_ААМ.docx (In Rus.)
23. Saitgalin, T. R., Antropova, V. V. Representation of phobias and fears of residents of the region with
increased socio- and technogenic risks in the discourse of government publications. User content in modern
communication. Chelyabinsk: ChelSU Publishing House, 2021: 70–75. (In Rus.)
24. Genette, G. Figures: Works on poetics. M.: Publishing house named after Sabashnikov, 1998. (In Rus.)
25. Fedorov, V. V. Transformation of the expressive component of the rhetorical model of modern Russian
media. Media linguistics. Language in the coordinates of the mass media: materials of the International Scientific
and Practical Conference. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University, 2016: 52–53. (In Rus.) |