Article
Article name	Human Dignity and Rationality of Modern Medicine in the Aspect of the Biomedical Technologies
Authors	Izutkin D.A. Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, dan55@mail.ru
Bibliographic description	Izutkin D. A. Human Dignity and Rationality of Modern Medicine in the Aspect of the Biomedical Technologies // Humanitarian Vector. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 5. PP. 43–49. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-5-43-49.
Section	Socium Axiology
UDK	606.608
DOI	10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-5-43-49
Article type
Annotation	Some ethical aspects of the usage of the biomedical technologies in the frame of human bodiness and the relationship of the physician and the sick from the point of human dignity are set forth in the article. Growing tendency of rationalization of medicine and broadening limits of its influence on healthy and diseased organism are highlighted. In particular, it is associated with the introduction in medical practice of different elements of the artificial intellect in the diagnostics and treatment of different diseases, which have found its legislative order in the Edict of the President of the Russian Federation. It challenges the necessity of consideration of this problem in the format of ethics and law with the accent on the dignity of the human as an individual and unique personality. Contradictive character of the usage of different biomedical technologies from the point of science, on the one hand, and human existence – on the other are marked. These positions are regarded in the aspects of the human bodiness and relationships of the physician and the sick. The problem of “vulnerability” of the human body is shown on the example of increase of different biomedical investigations, like experimental medicine and its “commodification”. In this respect, judgement about ontological role of the body in life space and human experience is exposed. In the analysis of the relationships of the physician and the sick through the “prism” of the biomedical technologies special attention is being paid to the change of the subject-object roles in this communicative sphere. As a sequence, technical model is starting dominating in modern medicine. All tye abovementioned ideas reflect transformation of historically assembled traditions of medical and ethical character and strengthening of the ideas of transhumanism when the sick individual loses its uniqueness and is being investigated in the virtual space.
Key words	biomedical technologies, bodiness, ethics, individual, physician, sick
Article information
References	1. Kugay, A. I. Medicine in the kaleidoscope of philosophy SPb: Аlateja, 2013. (In Rus). 2. Rabinow, P., Bennet, J. Designing human practices: An experiment with synthetic biology. Chicago. University of Chicago Press. 2012. (In Engl.) 3. Rabinow, P. Sociobiology and biosociality. Chelovek, no. 6, pp. 8–26, 2019. (In Rus.). 4. Turnwald, B. P., Goyer, J. P., Boles, D. Z. et al. Learning one’s genetic risk changes physiology independent of actual genetic risk. Nature Human Behavior, no. 3, pp. 48–56, 2019. (In Engl.) 5. Hollands, G. J., French D. P., Giffin S. J. et al. The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behavior: systematic review with meta-analysis. British med J, vol. 352, pp. 1–11, 2016. (In Engl.) 6. Chiapperino, L. Epigenetics: Ethics, politics, biosociality. British Med Bull, vol. 128, pp. 49–60, 2018. (In Engl.) 7. Аntipov, А. V. Biopolitics, biocapitalism and biosociality: formation and development. Chelovek, no. 6, pp. 174–187, 2019. (In Rus.) 8. Belyaletdinov, R. R. Biobanks in the context of technoscientific biosociality: the ethics of geneticization or the geneticization of ethics? Chelovek, no. 6, pp. 42–53, 2019. (In Rus.) 9. Brizgalina, Е. V. Medicine in the optics of artificial intellect: the philosophical context of the future. Chelovek, no. 6, pp. 54–71, 2019. (In Rus.) 10. Grebenshikova, Е. G. Biological citizenship: from patient organizations to consumer genomics. Chelovek, no. 6, pp. 72–81, 2019. (In Rus.) 11. History of the body. V. 3. Ed. by A. Korbena, Zh. Zh. Kurtina, Zh. Vigarello. M: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2016. (In Rus.) 12. Helmreich, S. Species of biocapital. Science as culture, no. 17: 4, pp. 463–478, 2008. (In Engl.) 13. Derner, К. Good physician. М: Аlteja, 2006. (In Rus.) 14. Cohen, S. The logic of the interaction between beneficence and respect for autonomy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, vol. 22, pp. 297–304, 2019. (In Engl.) 15. Beauchamp, L., Childress J. F. Principles of biomedical ethics. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press. 2001. (In Engl.) 16. Кutyrev, V. А. The last kissing, Human as tradition. SPb, Аlteja, 2015. (In Rus.) 17. Kutyrev, V. A., Slyusarev, V. V., Husyainov, T. M. Humanity and Technos: the philosophy of coevolution. М: Аleteja, 2020. (In Rus.) 18. Medical ethics manual. World Medical Association. 2005. (In Engl.) 19. Kurlenkova, A.S Social research of biomedical science and practice in modern Russia. Medical anthropology and bioethics, no.1, 2015. Web. 15.08.2021. http://www.medanthro.ru/?page_id=2219 . (In Rus.) 20. Kurlenkova, A. S. Attitude to biomedical innovations in Russia. Medical anthropology and bioethics, no. 1, 2017. Web. 15.08.2021. http://www.medanthro.ru/?page_id=3185 (In Rus). 21. Kurlenkova, A. S. “Naturally, children”: biopolitics or bio-responsible parenting. Chelovek, no. 6, pp. 112–129, 2019. (In Rus.) 22. Popova, О. V. Orphan diseases: loci of biosociality and regulatory practices. Chelovek, no. 6, pp. 156– 173, 2019. (In Rus.) 23. Savoshikovа, Е. V. The versatility of bioethics as a notion, legal aspects of regulation. Izvestiya ОGAU, no. 2, pp. 256–258, 2015. (In Rus.) 24. Siluyanovа, I. V. Bioethics in Russia: Values and Laws. М: 2001. (In Rus.) 25. Shevchenkо S. U. The meanings of biosociality: from risk groups to “genetic nocebo”. Chelovek, no. 6, pp. 27–41, 2019. (In Rus.) 26. Shkomovа, Е. М. Transformation of ethical regulators in the context of the development of medical and genetic counseling. Chelovek, no. 6, pp. 145–155, 2019. (In Rus.) 27. Yudin, G. B. “The Genetic Body”: the policy of genetic reductionism in modern natural science. Chelovek, no. 6, pp. 100–111, 2019. (In Rus.)
Full article	Human Dignity and Rationality of Modern Medicine in the Aspect of the Biomedical Technologies
	0
	0