References |
1. Scheler, M. Selected works. M: Gnosis, 1994. (In Rus.)
2. Scheler, M. Man and history. Thesis, issue 3, pp. 132–153, 1993. (In Rus.)
3. Khoruzhy, S. S. Man and his three distant destinies. Problems of Philosophy, no. 1, pp. 35–48, 2003. (In
Rus.)
4. Balandin, R. K. Noosphere or technosphere. Questions of Philosophy, no. 6, pp. 106–111, 2005. (In Rus.)
5. Ursul, A. D., Ursul, T. A. Universal (global) evolutionism and global research. Philosophical Thought,
no. 1, pp. 46–101, 2012. (In Rus.)
6. Schaeffer, J.-M. The end of human exclusivity. M: New Literary Review, 2010. (In Rus.)
7.Yugay, G. A. General theory of life (dialectics of formation). M: Thought, 1985. (In Rus.)
8. Khaitun, S. D. Evolution of the Universe. Questions of Philosophy, no. 10, pp. 82–91, 2004. (In Rus.)
9. Berdyaev, N. A. The Kingdom of the spirit and the kingdom of Caesar. Web. 14.02.2022. https://www.
litmir.me/br/?b=53796&p=1 (In Rus.)
10. Keligov, M. Homo sapiens: A transient phenomenon. M: Academic project, 2012. p. (In Rus.)
11. Kashtanova, S. M. Transgression as a socio-philosophical concept. Dr. sci. diss. abstr. Spb, 2016. (In
Rus.)
12. Foust, C. Transgression as a Mode of Resistance: Rethinking Social Movement in an Era of Corporate
Globalization. Lexington Books, 2010. (In Engl.)
13. Gregg, J. Maurice Blanchot and the Literature of Transgression. Princeton University Press, 1994. (In
Engl.)
14. Krainyuchenko, I. V. Global evolutionism and the synergetics of the noosphere. Dr. sci. diss. abstr. M.,
2004. (In Rus.)
15. Orudzhev, Z. M. On the emergence of the human mind. Questions of Philosophy, no. 1, pp. 22–30,
2009. (In Rus.)
16. Pinker, S. A. Blank slate: The nature of man. Who and why refuses to recognize it today. M: Alpina
non-fiction, 2018. (In Rus.)
17. Batishchev, G. S. The active essence of man as a philosophical principle. The problem of man in modern
philosophy. M: Mysl, 1969: 81–107. (In Rus.)
18. Kant, I. Ess. in 6 vol. Vol. 4. P. 1. M: Mysl’, 1965. (In Rus.)
19. Dubinin, N. P. What is a man? M: Mysl’, 1983. (In Rus.)
20. Lorenz, K. So-called evil. Towards a natural theory of aggression. Lorenz K. The flip side of the mirror.
M: Republic, 1998: 62–242 (In Rus.)
21. Vernadsky, V. I. Biosphere and noosphere. Web. 12.02.2022. https://www.rulit.me/books/biosfera-inoosfera-
read-412871–1.html (In Rus.)
22. Dubinin, N. P. What is a man? M: Mysl’, 1983. (In Rus.)
23. Balandin, R. K. Noosphere or technosphere. Questions of Philosophy, no. 6, pp. 106–111, 2005. (In
Rus.)
24. Huning, A. Homo mensura: people are their technology ‒ technology is inherent in man. Philosophy of
technology in Germany. M: Progress, 1989. (In Rus.)
25. Moiseyev, N. N. Man in the Universe and on Earth. Questions of philosophy, no. 6, pp. 40–43, 1990.
(In Rus.)
26. Belkina, G. L., Korsakov S. N., Frolova M. I. The ratio of natural and human in the bioethical concept
of I. T. Frolov / Problems of the correlation of natural and social in society and man. Chita: Transbaikal State
University, 2021: 5–15. (In Rus.)
27. Huseynov, A. A. Philosophical notes. Questions of philosophy, iss. 10, pp. 10–18, 2008. (In Rus.)
28. Nietzsche, F. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. M: Some, 2015. (In Rus.)
29. Gurevich, P. S. Classical and non-classical anthropology: comparative analysis, Moscow: Center for
Humanitarian Initiatives, 2018. (In Rus.)
30. Jenks, C. Transgression. Key Ideas. Routledge, 2003. (In Engl.)
31. Levit, G. S. Hossfeld U. Theory of evolution and philosophy of science. Bulletin of SPbSU. Philosophy
and conflictology, no. 2, pp. 229–246, 2021. (In Rus.)
32. Mayr, E. The advance of science and scientific revolution, Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences,
vol. 30, pp. 328–334,1994. (In Engl.)
33. Abbagnano, N. Introduction to existentialism. St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 1998. (In Rus.) |