||Siberian Animal Style as a Conceptual Basis for the Conversion of Traditional Artistic Heritage into Cultural Industries
||Gomboeva M.I. Doctor of Culturology, Professor, email@example.com
||Gomboeva M. I. Siberian Animal Style as a Conceptual Basis for the Conversion of Traditional Artistic Heritage into Cultural Industries // Humanitarian Vector. 2022. Vol. 17, No. 2. PP. 94–102. DOI: 10.21209/1996- 7853-2022-17-2-94-102.
||MENTAL AND SOCIOCULTURAL SPACE OF THE REGION
||The process of acquiring the author’s style, its semantic distinctive features, and the creation of the author’s
identity is a fundamental problem for artists. The paper is devoted to the analysis of the artist’s native culture
code influence on the creative concept and artistic language. Artistic inversion is important ‒ the inverse representation
of the cultural code in the artist’s work. We consider artistic, pictorial inversion as a form of the artistic
conceptualization. It contributes to the successful understanding of the connotations and intentions of the artist’s
work by his audience. An analysis of Namdakov’s work allowed us to conceptualize the representation problem of the cultural code in Far East peoples’ contemporary art and describe artistic strategies that represent the
influence of such semantic aspects of the cultural code as the influence of the artistic worldview, the strategies
elevation of original interpretation and transformation of the animal style, the influence of the academic background.
We define the artistic paradigm of the style as a style-forming factor in contemporary creative industries
of artists who emerged from traditional crafts communities. The phenomenon of ethnic artistic tradition has been
widely studied in the art history literature (T. M. Stepanskaya, A. V. Edokova, L. I. Nekhlyadovich). We believe,
however, that attention should be focused on the content of “cultural code of artistic paradigm”, because ethnic
artists consciously transform national artistic images and techniques through integration of their heritage into
contemporary artistic language, culture and art background. This is particularly relevant for artists who institutionalize
their style into a recognizable contemporary art language strategy. The main research question addressed
in this paper is the representation peculiarities of the Namdakov’s artistic strategy semantic forms. He creates
innovative ways of shaping, applies illogical, provocative and asymmetrical compositional solutions, creates
fresh artistic metaphors, overcomes visual and figurative traditions and transforms ethnic artistic traditions into
the leading artistic world-class trends of contemporary art. It has been proved that the animalistic style acquired a
new modern dimension with the development of the creative industry in the regions of South-East Asia: the north
of modern China and the art workshops of D. Namdakov and Zhigzhit Bayaskhalanov in the Russian Federation.
It was the original interpretation of the animalistic style that became a powerful source for the development of traditional
folk craft culture and brought the Far East peoples’ modern art to a new level of development, contributed
to the evolution of the artist’s creative potential and gave many artists hope for creative expression.
||type of style formation, animal style as a code of artistic culture, transformation of animal style,ethnic artistic tradition, lapidarity, postmodern style transformation
||1. Stories about paintings: painting. Altai museum of fine and decorative art. Ed. by T. M. Stepanskaya.
Barnaul, 1979. (In Rus.)
2. Pauls, E. D. On the origin of the Scythian canon in fine arts. Steppes of Eurasia in antiquity and the
Middle Ages. Materials of the scientific-practical conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of
M. P. Gryaznov. St. Petersburg: 2003: 124–125. (In Rus.)
3. Makovsky, S. K. At the Frontiers of Cubism. Silhouettes of Russian Artists. M: 1921: 106–120. (In Rus.)
4. Mitchell, J. T. Iconology. Image, text, ideology. M: Yekaterinburg: Armchair scientist, 2017. (In Rus.)
5. Panofsky, E. On the problem of description and interpretation of works of fine art / translated from English
by Simonova, V. V. St. Petersburg: Acad. project, 1999. (In Rus.)
6. Nikolaeva, M., Scott C. How Picturebooks work. NY: Taylar and Francis, 2013. (In Engl.)
7. Sergeev, D. V., Feng, Zunren. The current state of cultural industries in China. Proceedings of the
VI International Scientific and Practical Conference: Design. Fashion. Cultural institutions. Chita, 2019: 153–159.
8. Coats, Karen. The Bloomsbury Introduction to Children’s and Young Adult Literature. London: Bloomsbury
Academic, 2018. (In Engl.)
9. Korol’kova, U. F. Animal style of Eurasia. The art of the tribes of the Lower Volga and Southern Urals in
the Scythian era (VII–IX centuries BC). St. Petersburg: Petersburg Oriental Studies, 2006. (In Rus.) 10. Gryaznov, M. P. etc. The complex of archaeological monuments near Mount Tepsei on the Yenisei.
Novosibirsk, 1979. (In Rus.)
11. Savinov, D. G. Karasuk tradition and “Arzhan-Maiemir” style. Ancient cultures of Central Asia.
St. Petersburg. Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific conference dedicated to the 70th anniversary of the
birth of Alexander Danilovich Grach. St. Petersburg: Kult-inform-press. 1998: 132–136. (In Rus.)
12. Okladnikov, A. P. Deer golden horns. Stories about the hunt for rock paintings. Publishing house “Art”.
Leningrad; Moscow: Art, 1964. (In Rus.)
13. Panofsky, E. Etudes in iconology. St. Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika, 2009. (In Rus.)
|Full article||Siberian Animal Style as a Conceptual Basis for the Conversion of Traditional Artistic Heritage into Cultural Industries|