| Annotation |
At the present stage of the developed society, the attention of scientists and practitioners to the analysis
of the digital society has increased. This is evidenced by the appearance of various publications in line with this
issue; the formation and implementation of regulatory documents, for example, the Strategy for the Development
of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017–2030. In this regard, it becomes relevant
to analyze a new model of the quality of life, a digital one, as one of the results of the development of a digital
society. The methodological basis of the research is the concepts of the representatives of post industrialism D. Bell, P. Drucker, G. Galbraith, E. Toffl er about the role of theoretical knowledge and technology in ensuring the
quality of life as determinants of all processes occurring in societies, as well as the ideas of the members of the
Club of Rome, who created models of life quality and determined the ways to ensure it in relation to developing
countries. This article analyzes individual models of digital society as social practices, which showed that the
main trend of their development should be a new quality of digital life, generated by the digital environment and
forming new technologies, communications, interaction mechanisms. A certain concept of “digital model of quality
of life” is a refl ection of the processes of digitization of everyday life and professional activity of a new subject
of public life. We revealed that new interactions arise in the digital model of quality of life: knowledge that creates
new technologies is the determining and producing resource for all benefi ts; the introduction of these technologies
ensures the development of the digital economy, which forms the need for new mechanisms that determine
the evolution of society and man, as the subject of these trends which education should form. The digital model
of the quality of life is studied from the standpoint of objectivism and subjectivism. The research materials can
be used in assessing trends in the development of modern digital society, identifying the prospects for the development
of society in the conditions of digitalization, in making forecasts of the future development of mankind. |
| References |
1. Shvab, K. Fourth industrial revolution. M: Eksmo, 2016. (In Rus.)
2. Shvab, K., Devis, N. Technologies of the fourth industrial revolution. M: Bombora, 2018. (In Rus.)
3. Kastel’s, M. The Information Age: Economics, Society and Culture. M: GU VSHE, 2000. (In Rus.)
4. Chernavin, Yu. A. Digital Society: Theoretical Outlines of the Emerging Paradigm. Digital sociology,
no. 2, pp. 4–12, 2021. (In Rus.)
5. Dobrinskaya, D. E. What is digitalization? Sociology of science and technology, no. 2, pp. 112–129,
2021. (In Rus.)
6. Hegel, G. V. F. Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Science of logic. M: Mysl’, 1974. (In Rus.)
7. Toffl er, E. The Third wave. M: AST, 2010. (In Rus.)
8. Vorozhikhin, V. V. “Society 5.0” as humanity’s response to the challenges of global development. Russia:
trends and development prospects. Yearbook. M: INION RAN, 2019: 62–69. (In Rus.)
9. Deguchi, A. Society 5.0. A People-Centric Super-Smart Society. Singapore: Springer. 2020. The conversation
Web. 10.08.2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2989-4. (In Engl.)
10. Shvetsov, D. U. At the origins of “Industry. 4.0”: how the German industry is developing. Control Engineering
Russia, pp. 16–21, 2021. (In Rus.)
11. Liga, M. B., Shchetkina, I. A., Zakharova E. Y u. Quality of life models. M: RUSAKI, 2013. (In Rus.)
12. Trepalin, Yu. A. Who is in the lead in terms of “digital quality of life”? The conversation. Web. 08.08.2022.
https://nag.ru/material/38504. (In Rus.)
13. Digitalization of society and methods of its research / Ed. by T. V. Morozova. Petrozavodsk: KarNC
RAN, 2018. (In Rus.)
14. Beck, U. The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016. (In Engl.)
15. Toffl er, A. The third wave. New York: Bantam Books, 1980. (In Engl.)
16. Kashirina, O. V., Filyushkina, D. V. Priority needs and the formation of a new type of thinking of the
youth of generation Z as a civilizational subject looking to the future. Society: philosophy, history, culture, no. 7,
pp. 13–18, 2021. (In Rus.)
17. Zakharova, A. S. New understanding of health in the context of digitalization: perspectives and contradictions.
Digital society ‒ a new format of social reality: structures, processes and development trends: materials
of the All-Russian Scientifi c Conference XIV “Kovalev’s Readings” (November 12–14, 2020). St. Petersburg:
Scythia-print, 2020: 51–52. (In Rus.)
18. Childer, T. The Information Poor in America. Metuchen, N.-J.: Scarecrow Press, 1975. (In Engl.)
19. Kolesnik, A. P. Social systems in the digital economy. Strategii biznesa, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2018. (In Rus.)
20. Veselov, Yu. V. Trust in the digital society. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Sociology, no. 2, pp. 129–
143, 2020. (In Rus.) |
