Annotation |
The article deals with a little-studied topic with the aim of studying localization of Buryat ritual hitching posts
serge in the space from Ust-Orda district to Cape Khoboy on Olkhon Island in the 21st century. The article is
based on the field observations and materials, literary and electronic sources. The hypothesis of the study was
proved – in conditions of globalization and active increase in international tourist flows, the Buryats are expanding
the boundaries of their own sacred world to create a specific system of protective mechanisms against intensive
foreign cultural influence. Sacred objects contribute to the preservation of the fragile ecology of the region.
One of the key methods used in the article is ideographic method, which is supplemented with analysis and
generalization. There are three entrance signs/complexes, in which the central place is given to ritual hitching
posts on the section of the R-418 highway from Irkutsk to the border of the Olkhonsky district. On this section
of the road there is a barisa, a ritual complex, with three serge. In the Olkhon region, nine serge are located at
the mouth of the river Angi near Mount Yordo where the Yordyn Games are held. On the island of Olkhon near the cape Burkhan, 13 ritual hitching posts have been erected in honor of the “13 northern noyons”, occupying a
special place in the shamanic pantheon of Buryats. There is a ritual hitching post serge on Cape Khoboy. The
researched cult objects were established in the 21st century by the decision of the population and are all-Olkhon,
and possibly all Buryat. The innovative character of the ritual hitching posts lies in their considerable size and in
their installation in places where they were not previously installed, thus expanding the sacred territory. These
considered Olkhon serge, despite of their increased size, retain their authenticity, in contrast to the stylized serge
standing on the entrance steles. A new organization of the socio-cultural space with the help of ritual hitching
posts indicates that the ethnic culture has been transforming into a national one. |
References |
1. Andreeva, E. V. Cultural heritage as the core of cultural memory and its role in preserving the spiritual
integrity of Russian civilization. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. Rostov-on-Don, 2007. (In Rus.)
2. Dugarov, D. S. Historical roots of white shamanism (based on materials of Buryat ritual folklore). M:
Nauka, 1991. (In Rus.)
3. Zaksheeva, E. O. Serge in the traditional culture of the Buryats. Taltsy: architecture, ethnography, ethnic
history, toponymy, philology, no. 2, pp. 47–55, 2009. (In Rus.)
4. Lygdenova, V. V. The symbol and meanings of serge in the wedding tradition of the Barguzin Buryats
in the second half of the 20th – early 21st centuries. Balandinsky readings, vol. XIV, pp. 49–51, 2019. (In Rus.)
5. Zhambalova, S. G. The profane and sacred worlds of the Olkhon Buryats. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2000. (In Rus.)
6. Sodnompilova, M. M. The world in the traditional worldview and practical activities of the Mongolian
peoples. Ulan-Ude: BNTs SB RAS, 2009. (In Rus.)
7. Yumsunov, V. The history of the origin of eleven Khori clans. Buryat chronicles. Ulan-Ude: BION SO RAN,
1995:36–102. (In Rus.)
8. Khagdaev, V. V. The shamanic world of the Olkhon region. Central Asian shamanism: philosophical,
historical, religious aspects (Materials of the international scientific symposium, June 20–26, Ulan-Ude, lake.
Baikal). Ulan-Ude, 1996: 134. (In Rus.)
9. Pavlinskaya, L. R. Nomads of the Blue Mountains (The Fate of the Traditional culture of the Eastern
Sayan in the context of interaction with modernity). St. Petersburg: European House Publishing House, 2002.
(In Rus.)
10. Zhambalova, S. G. Olkhon in the 21st century: traditions and innovations in the system life support of
the population. North-Eastern Humanitarian Bulletin, no. 3, pp. 57–66, 2020. (In Rus.)
11. Zykin, A. V., Trufanov, A. O. On the question of the formation of concepts of national and ethnic culture and
features of their content. Izvestiya St. Petersburg State Agrarian University, no. 38, pp. 344–349, 2015. (In Rus.)
12. Toynbee, A. J. Research of history: The emergence, growth and decay of civilizations. M: AST MOSCOW,
2009. (In Rus.)
13. Romanova, E. N. Landscape in the culture of memory. Arctic XXI century. Humanitarian sciences,
no. 2(5), pp. 93–98, 2015. (In Rus.)
14. Kagansky, V. L. The World of Cultural Landscape. Science of Culture: Results and Prospect, issue 3,
pp. 31–67, 1995. (In Rus.)
15. Kuleshova, M. E. Cultural landscapes, their place in the World Heritage List and prospects for Russian
representation. Legacy and modernity, no. 4, pp. 111–130, 2018. (In Rus.) |