| Annotation |
The relevance of the article is associated with the influence of digital technologies on the medical sphere
in the context of the formation of VUCA (variability, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity) of the space. The main
problem in this context is the ethical and philosophical aspects of the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) in
the medical field and the activities of the doctor, in particular, the possibility of its application in the diagnostic
process. The latter is considered as an integral attribute of the cognitive nature of the medical profession. This
is due to the constant and dynamic knowledge of the functioning of the human body in a state of normality and
pathology, the problem of medical errors, as well as the philosophical reflections of the physician during the establishment
of the diagnosis. The main goal is to show the contradictory nature of AI use in medicine, which is
associated with certain qualitative transformation and reassessment of traditionally formed ideas about the role
of the physician as an active subject within the framework of his professional activity. The methodology for studying
this problem is based on a dialectical approach. This allows to consider the medical sphere as a synthesis
and contradiction of the natural and artificial, as well as to emphasize the subject-object nature of the physician’s activity. The novelty of the study lies in the ethical and philosophical understanding of the self-identification of the
physician and his clinical thinking in the conditions of the application of AI in medicine. In the context of this article,
self-identification of a physician is understood as an awareness of his self and claim to be demanded in the
field of medical professional activity; clinical thinking ‒ as a set of theoretical knowledge, practical skills, empirical
experience and philosophical generalizations in an effort to identify and explicate the pathological process. It is
emphasized that AI application significantly modifies the role and functions of the physician in modern (primarily
clinical) medicine, which, in turn, affects his judgments about the disease (its etiology, psychosomatic nature, risk
factors for health). This, in particular, is being stipulating in the communication of the physician with the patient.
The prospects of the study are associated with further introduction of AI in clinical medicine, which is associated
with the need to solve a complex of ethical and legal problems and the formation of a new medical paradigm. |
| References |
1. Baimuratova, L. R. Sharova, O. A. Digital Literacy for the Economy of the Future; M: Natsional’noe
agentstvo finansovyh issledovaniy, 2018. (In Rus.)
2. Belyaletdinov, R. R., Grebenshchikova E. G., Kiyashchenko L. P. et al. Socio-humanitarian support of
personalized medicine projects: philosophical aspect. Philosophy and Modernity, no. 4, pp. 12–23, 2014. (In
Rus.)
3. Bledzhyants, G. A., Sarkisyan, M. A., Isakova, Y. A. et al. Socio-humanitarian support of personalized
medicine projects: philosophical aspect to medicine. Remedium, no. 12, pp. 10–15, 2015. (In Rus.)
4. Kobrinskiy, B. A. Personalized medicine: genome, e-health and intelligent systems. Ch. 2. Molecular
Genetics and Methods of Intellectual Analysis. Ross. News of Perinatology and Pediatrics, no. 6, pp. 16–22,
2017. (In Rus.)
5. Makarov, A. D., Saksena, M., Sapozhnikov, D. P. Prospects for the use of artificial intelligence and big
data to bring medical practice to a qualitatively new level. Health Organization: News. Opinions. Education. Bulletin
of the Higher School of Health Organization and Management, no. 2, pp. 43–45, 2017. (In Rus.)
6. Morkhat, P. M. On the specifics of the legal regulation of artificial intelligence and some legal problems of
its application in certain areas. Law and right, no. 6, pp. 63–67, 2018. (In Rus.)
7. Omel’chenko, V. P. Information technologies in professional activity. Textbook. M: GEOTAR–Media,
2020. (In Rus.)
8. Poryaeva, E. P., Evstaf’eva, E. A. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Bulletin of science and education,
no. 6–2 (60), pp. 15–19, 2019. (In Rus.)
9. Simankov, V. S., Halafyan, A. A. System analysis and modern information technologies in medical decision
support systems. M: OOO “BinomPress”, 2009. (In Rus)
10. Konnell, M. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity. M: Bombora, 2019. (In Rus.)
11. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Applications, Limitations and Future Directions. Editors Manda Raz,
Tam C. Nguyen, Erwin Loh. Springer, 2022. (In Engl.)
12. Jutterand F., Bosco C. Artificial intelligence in medicine: A sword of Damocles? J. Med. Systems, no. 9,
2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01796-7. (In Engl.)
13. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Ed. Lidsroemer N., Ashrafian H. Springer, 2022. (In Engl.)
14. Body History. Vol.3. Ed. by A. Korbena, Zh. Zh. Kurtin, Zh. Vigarello. M: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie,
2016. (In Rus.)
15. Kutyrev, V. A. One last kiss. Man as tradition. Saint Petersburg, Alteiya., 2015. (In Rus.)
16. Kiener, M. Artificial intelligence and the disclosure of risks. AI and Society, no. 36, p. 705–713, 2021.
(In Engl.)
17. Arnold, M. Teasing out artificial intelligence in medicine: An ethical critique of artificial intelligence and
machine learning in medicine. J. Bioethical Inquiry, no. 18, pp. 121–139, 2021. (In Engl.)
18. Bryzgalina, E. V. Medicine in the Optics of Artificial Intelligence: A Philosophical Context of the Future.
Human, no. 6, pp. 54–71, 2019. (In Rus.)
19. Medical Ethics Manual. World Medical Association, 2005. (In Engl.)
20. Intelligent Systems in Medicine. Ed. T. Cohen, et al. Springer, 2022. (In Engl.)
21. Yudin B. G. Medicine and Human Design. Yudin B. G. Chelovek: vyhod za predely. M: Progress-tradiciya,
2018: 398–411. (In Rus.)
22. Abrahams, E., Ginsburg G., Silver M. The Personalized Medicine Coalition: Goals and Strategies.
American Journal of Pharmacogenomics, no. 5, p. 345–355, 2005. (In Engl.)
23. Gunderson, T., Baeroe, K. The future ethics of artificial intelligence in medicine: Making sense of collaborative
models. Science and Engineering Ethics, no. 28:17, pp. 1–16, 2022. (In Engl.)
24. Liu Peng-ran, et al. Application of artificial intelligence in medicine: An overview. Current Medical Science,
no. 41, pp. 1105–1115, 2021. (In Engl.)
25. Shabaruddin, F. H., Fleeman, N. D., Payne K. Economic evaluations of personalized medicine: existing
challenges and current developments. Pharmacogenomics Personalized Medicine, no. 8, pp. 115–126, 2015.
(In Engl.) |
