| Annotation |
The study examines the issue of actualization of facts of historical memory as a form of media memory in modern media discourse, and clarifies its place and role in propaganda, in this case understood as the dissemination of knowledge and the formation of a scientific worldview. Media memory is studied through its manifestations in the discourse (de facto official media discourse) about the Special Military Operation on the example of the program “Vremya” (Channel 1 of television) for the first 10 months of the SMO. The development of a model of media memory actualization in the context of news is both the goal of the research and determines its novelty. The methodology applied is complex – both primary and secondary information analysis methods are used. For this purpose, a content analysis of the “Vremya” program broadcasts is conducted, a focus group is organized, and an array of sociological data from open sources of VTsIOM is selected. As a result, the data was obtained, which allowed us to establish that the ways of addressing the facts of the Great Patriotic War memory in the studied narrative are identical to the known approaches to the organization of media propaganda, that the creation of historical memory is influenced by both objectively acting factors of the media society and subjective ones – the efforts of political actors to establish in the public consciousness a model of media memory that corresponds to the current political situation: the locus of history, to which the audience’s attention is directed, and a set of asserted goals are chosen. Thus, the events of the Special Military Operation are perceived through the prism of the heroic past, they acquire sacredness, and attempts to belittle them look like undermining the value system of society. The intension is reinforced by the optimism of the general mood of the programs, which tell about Russia’s successful overcoming of difficulties in the economic and financial spheres that arose under the influence of Western sanctions.
|
| References |
1. Artamonov, D. S., Tikhonova, S. V. Temporal structures of media memory. Myth in history, politics, culture. Sevastopol: Lomonosov MSU Branch in Sevastopol, 2020: 188–191. (In Rus.)
2. Artamonov, D. S. Media memory: theoretical aspect. In: Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, no. 2, pp. 65–83. 2022. DOI: 10.46539/gmd.v4i2.269. (In Rus.)
3. Riker, P. Memory, history, oblivion. Translation from French. M: Izdatel’stvo gumanitarnoi literatury, 2004. (In Rus.)
4. Assman, Ian. Cultural Memory: Writing, Memory of the Past, and Political Identity in the High Cultures of Antiquity. Translation from German. M: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2004. (In Rus.)
5. Megill, A. Historical Epistemology. Translation from English. M: “Kanon+” ROOI “Reabilitatsiia”, 2007. (In Rus.)
6. Kubik, J., Bernhard, M. A theory of the politics of memory. M. Bernhard, J. Kubik (Ed.), Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. P. 7–34. Web. 10.09.2024. http: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199375134.003.0002. (In Eng.)
7. Garde-Hansen, J., Hoskins, A., Reading, A. Save as… Digital memories. L: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. DOI: 10.1057/9780230239418. (In Eng.)
8. Hoskins, A. 7/7 and connective memory: Interactional trajectories of remembering in post-scarcity culture. Memory Studies, no. 4, pp. 269–280, 2011. DOI: 10.1177/1750698011402570. (In Eng.)
9. Social Memory and History: Anthropological Perspectives. Ed. by J. J. Climo, M. G. Gattell. Walnut Creek, 2002. (In Eng.)
10. Rüsen, J. Was ist Geschichtskultur? Überlegungen zu einer neuen Art, über Geschichte nachzudenken. Historische Faszination. Geschichtskultur heute / Eds. K. Füßmann, H. T. Grütter, J. Rüsen. Köln, 1994. P. 5–7. (In German)
11. Tiukina, L. A. Memory and historical memory: the relationship between concepts. Upper Volga Philological Herald, no. 1, pp. 181–187, 2020. DOI: 10.20323/2499-9679-2020-1-20-181-187. (In Rus.)
12. Artamonov, D. S. Media Memory in the Digital Age. Saratov: Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo universiteta, 2023. (In Rus.)
13. Lotman, Yu. M. Memory of Culture. Semiosphere: Culture and Explosion. Inside Thinking Worlds. Articles. Research. Notes. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb, 2000. P. 614–621. (In Rus.)
14. Artamonov, D. S., Tikhonova, S. V. Mediatization of History and Problems of Historical Education in the Digital World. Andreeva Yu. Yu., Rakhimbaeva I. E. editors Modern cultural and educational space of humanities and social sciences. Saratov, 2020. P. 357–365. (In Rus.)
15. Ankersmit, F. R. Sublime Historical Experience. Translation from Dutch. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Evropa, 2007. (In Rus.)
16. Vandyshev, M. N. Industrial Memory: Scale and Multiplicity. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta, 2022. (In Rus.)
17. Zhizhek, S. Plague of Fantasy. Translation from English. Khar’kov: Gumanitarnyi Tsentr, 2014. (In Rus.)
18. Crosbie, V. What is New Media? Web. 10.09.2024. https://www.academia.edu/37596635/What_is_New_Media_April_27_2004_ (In Eng.)
19. Golovashina, O. V., Linchenko, A. A., Anikin, D. A. In Memory of the Great Technical War: Our Lives in Russian Historical Society. Sotsiological Research, no. 3, pp. 123–133, 2017. (In Rus.)
20. Manovich, L. The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001. (In Eng.)
21. Castells, M. The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age. Economy, Society, and Culture. Vol. 1; 2nd Edition with a New Preface edition. Oxword: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. (In Eng.)
22. Shapinskaia, E. N. History in digital format: the future of our past. In: Culture of Culture, no. 1, 2020. (In Rus.)
23. Tosh, J. The Pursuit of History: Aims, Methods and New Directions in the Study of Modern History. Third edition. L.; N. Y., 2000. (In Eng.)
24. Kefeli, I. F. Global risks of the modern world. In: Prolegomena of cognitive security. Edited by I. F. Kefeli. St. Petersburg: ID “Petropolis”, 2023: 14–66. (In Rus.)
25. Dijck, J. Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Stanford UP, 2007. Web. 10.09.2024. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/1896878.pdf. (In Eng.)
|
