| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Criticism of Social Passivity Among Buddhists and Daoists in the Works of Han Yu (768–824) |
| Authors | Mazur T.G. Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor, mtbi@yandex.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | HISTORY: MEANINGS AND VALUES |
| UDK | 1(510)+299.5 |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2025-20-2-39-45 |
| Article type | Original article |
| Annotation | The article presents criticism analysis of social passivity among Buddhists and Daoists as presented in the works of Han Yu (768–824), a Confucian scholar of Tang China (618–907). The content of Confucian criticism against adherents of Buddhism and Daoism reflects the complex interactions between these religious traditions in Chinese society and touches upon important aspects of Buddhism transformation in China. This remains relevant for understanding contemporary socio-cultural processes, in particular the phenomenon of engaged Buddhism. The purpose of the article is to demonstrate that Han Yu’s primary criticism of these religions targeted the social passivity of their adherents. The research is based on the analysis of Han Yu’s works as historical sources reflecting the interaction between Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism during the Tang period. The works under consideration have not been previously translated into Russian and have not been introduced into scholarly discourse within Russian sinology. The research uses the method of historical-cultural contextual analysis, as well as the biographical method. This article demonstrates that Han Yu’s attitude toward Buddhism and Daoism was not uniformly negative. The analyzed works lack criticism of Buddhist or Daoist doctrines per se. Instead, Han Yu expresses respect for the personal qualities of monks with whom he maintained friendly relations, faulting them solely for their social passivity: a perceived lack of engagement in socially meaningful activities. We draw a conclusion that during Han Yu’s lifetime in Tang society adherence to Daoism and even Buddhism was not regarded by Confucian officialdom as a hindrance to state service, provided that a socially active stance was maintained. The prospects for further research are associated with a deeper exploration of the mutual influences among Buddhism, Daoism and Confucianism, both in light of a deeper understanding of historical context surrounding their transformation and in the context of contemporary discussions on the role of religion in society. |
| Key words | Tang China, Confucianism, Buddhism, Daoism, Han Yu, Buddhist and Daoist monks, criticism of social passivity |
| Article information | |
| References | Veber M. The Economic Ethics of the World Religions: Experiments of comparative sociology of Religion. Confucianism and Daoism. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’, 2017. 446 p. (In Russian). 2. Abaev NV. Chan Buddhism and cultural and psychological traditions in medieval China. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otd-nie; 1989. 272 p. (In Russian). 3. Gorbunova SA. China: religion and power. The History of Chinese Buddhism in the context of society and the State. M.: FORUM; 2008. 320 p. (In Russian). 4. Ulanov MS., Badmaev VN. The Phenomenon of Socially Engaged Buddhism on the Contemporary WORLD. The New Research of Tuva. 2023;(3):138–150. DOI: 10.25178/nit.2023.3.9. EDN: BHDHGO (In Russian). 5. Konrad N. I. Han Yu and the beginning of the Chinese Renaissance. In West and East. Мoscow: Nauka; 1966. P. 119‒151. (In Russian). 6. Zhelokhovtsev AN. Literary views of Han Yu and Liu Zongyuan. In Historical and philological research. Мoscow. Nauka. 1974:200-208. (In Russian). 7. Gusarov VF. Some points of the Han Yu’s theory of way. In Written monuments of the East 1972. Мoscow: Nauka; 1977. P. 197–203. (In Russian). 8. Starostina AB Confucian Concept of «Transmission of the Way» in the Works by Han Yu. Orientalistica. 2020;3(3):70-83. DOI: 10.31696/2618-7043-2020-3-1-70-83. EDN: UXPIKT (In Rhssian). 9. Issues of Far Eastern Literatures. Papers of the 8th International Conference. August 24–28, 2018. Saint Petersburg: IPK “NP–Print”.2018;(1):441. (In Russian). 10. Essays in Han Yu Studies. Guangzhou: Guangdong People’s Press, 1988; 406 p. (In Chinese). 11. Hartman Ch. Han Yü and the T’ang Search for Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1986. 459 p. 12. Bian Xiaoxuan, Zhang Qinhua, Yan Qi. Critical biography of Han Yu. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press; 1998. 586 p. (In Chine). 13. Luo Kedian. About Han Yu. Taibei: National Press; 1982. 243 p. (In Chinese). 14. Luo Liantian. Han Yu Research. Taibei: Taiwan Students Bookstore; 1981. 457 p. (In Chinese). 15. Tan Jishan. Han Yu. Taibei: Wansheng Publishing Co., Ltd.: 1983. 219 p. (In Chinese). 16. Mazur TG. The Buddhist Temples in the Works Of Han Yu. Religious studies. 2022;3:46–52. DOI: 10.22250/20728662_2022_3_46. EDN: ICFCUJ (In Russian). 17. Mazur TG. Han Yu’s Poems Addressed to the Taoist Han Xiangzi as an Author’s Commentary on the “Memorial on the Buddha Relic”. Bulletin of the Buryat Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023;(1):112‒116. DOI: 10.31554/2222-9175-2023-49-112-116. EDN: VWCZFL (In Russian). 18. Lavrač M. On Parting, Separation and Longing in the Chinese Poetic Tradition. Interlitteraria. 2015;20(2):105-122. DOI: 10.12697/IL.2015.20.2.10 (In Russian). 19. Hamar I. A religious leader in the Tang: Chengguan’s biography. Tokyo: International Institute for Buddhist Studies, 2002. 90 p. 20. Cheen G. Translating Totality in Parts: Chengguan’s Commentaries and Subcommentaries to the Avatamsaka Sutra. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2014. 154 p. 21. Yangutov LE. Philosophy and Soteriology of Chinese Buddhism. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2023 344 p. (In Russian). |
| Full article | Criticism of Social Passivity Among Buddhists and Daoists in the Works of Han Yu (768–824) |
| 0 | |
| 16 | |
