| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Synergetic Anthropology: Social-Praxeological Aspect |
| Authors | Shvets I.V. Postgraduate Student, shvetsirina@gmail.com |
| Bibliographic description | Shvets I. V. Synergetic Anthropology: Social-Praxeological Aspect // Humanitarian Vector. 2018. Vol. 13, No. 3. PP. 84–89. |
| Section | PHILOSOPHY OF MAN |
| UDK | 101.1:316 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article theme actuality deals with the necessity of understanding the methodological shift from universalizing discourse of essences (inherent for scientific knowledge within the framework of the classical paradigm) to searching the ways of combining the rigor of scientific approach and the specifics of social reality becoming open and diversified, typical for social philosophy nowadays; further development of conceptual, technical and organizational forms for the effective functioning of individual and collective subjects in a situation sociality in dynamic. The purpose of this article is to describe the specific methodological resources of synergetic anthropology. Synergetic anthropology in a number of similar concepts (social heterology, differential conception of the subject) re-describes social reality using non-classical principles of being and subject understanding as becoming, using as material ascetic-monastic tradition of Christianity (and other religions) as a special kind of spiritual space where the particular anthropological models and the corresponding methods of existence have been created. The specificity of the considered approach is the analysis of religious practices as genetic conditions of religious experience that allows us to combine phenomenological rigor and research involvement. |
| Key words | subject, synergetic anthropology, social heterology, spiritual practices, anthropological border, methodology of the humanitarian science |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Bakhtin, M. Person in the Realm of Words. M., 1995. (In Rus.) 2. Kerimov, T. H. Social Heterology: Metodology and Theory of Research: Dr. sci. diss. Yekaterinburg, 1999. (In Rus.) 3. Mitrofanova, A. David Zilberman’s Modal Philosophy and Theory of Communism. Zilberman David. Orthodox Ethics and the Matter of Communism. SPb: Izdatelstvo Ivana Limbakha, 2014. (In Rus.) 4. Smirnov, A. E. On the Content of Religious Tradition and Ways of Religious Experience Reproduction. Izvestiya Irkutskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya Politologiya. Religiovedeniye, V. 8, pp. 248–255, 2014. (In Rus.) 5. Smirnov, A. E. Religious Conversion and the Problem of Ontology of a Subject. Part 1. Izvestiya Irkutskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya Politologiya.Religiovedeniye, v. 11, pp. 190–201, 2014. (In Rus.) 6. Smirnov, A. E. Processes of Subjectivation: theoretical and methodological aspects. Irkutsk: NTSRVKH SO RAMN, 2011. (In Rus.) 7. Smirnov, A. E. Subjectivation. Sovremenniy filosofskiy slovar. M: Akademicheskiy proekt; Yekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 2015. (In Rus.) 8. Smirnov, A. E., Agrafonov M. Yu. Christian Ascesis and Hermeneutics of Subject. Vestnik Buryatskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, no.6, pp. 55–57, 2009. (In Rus.) 9. Diogenes Lantern. Project of synergetic anthropology in modern humanitarian context. M: Progress-Traditsiya, 2010. (In Rus.) 10. Fuko, M. Hermeneutics of Subject. The course of lectures delivered at the Collège de France in 1981–1982 academic year. SPb: Nauka, 2007. (In Rus.) 11. Khoruzhiy, S. S. To the phenomenology of ascesis. M: Izd-vo gumanitarnoy literaturi, 1998. (In Rus.) 12. Badiou, A. Second Manifesto for Philosophy. Polity Press, 2011. (In Engl.) 13. Žižec, S. Event. Penguin Books, 2014. (In Engl.) 14. Ranciere, J. Dissensus: on Politics and Aesthetics. London, New York : Bloomsbury Publishing Plc., 2014. (In Engl.) 15. Who comes after the Subject? Ed. by Cavada, E., Connor, P., Nancy, J.-L. London, Routledge, 1991. (In Engl.) |
| Full article | Synergetic Anthropology: Social-Praxeological Aspect |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
