Article
Article name	Conceptualizing the Anthropological Dimension of the Languages of Knowing in Modern Culture
Authors	Simonov Y.P. Candidate of History, kfmgimo@gmail.com
Bibliographic description	Simonov Yu. I. Conceptualizing the Anthropological Dimension of the Languages of Knowing in Modern Culture // Humanitarian Vector. 2018. Vol. 13, No. 3. PP. 124–131. DOI: 10/21209/1996-7853-2018-13-3-124-131.
Section	PHILOSOPHY OF THINKING AND COGNITION
UDK	130.2
DOI	10/21209/1996-7853-2018-13-3-124-131
Article type
Annotation	The urgency of the research is defined by the need of data classification on the differences between the ways of knowing in culture, as well as new processes related to the balance between science, art and religion in the modern world, the changing role of philosophy and the need to clarify all ways mentioned above as the “languages of knowing” in anthropological and axiological dimensions. The methods of hermeneutics and categorical analysis used in the research are based on the principles of objectivity and dynamism. Anthropological approach is also employed, promoting concentration on the problem of “analogy dismantling” in cognition. The novelty of the research consists in the conclusion that philosophy is a “core unfinished project” aimed at searching for a personal synthesis of knowing at a new level. In this case each of the “languages of knowing” has its inherent value, is not reducible to the other ones. Staying within the framework of thinking, the “languages of knowing” cannot be reduced either to psycho-social projections or to imitative modes of activity acquisition. On the whole, understanding the ways of knowing possibilities and limitations through the anthropological dimension elucidates the vital task – cultural comprehensive study through the prism of philosophical reflection.
Key words	philosophy, culture, languages of knowing, religion and art, concept, paradox, paragon
Article information
References	1. Averintsev, S. S. Ancient rhetoric and the fate of the ancient rationalism. Image of antiquity. M: Azbuka-Klassika, 2004. (In Rus.) 2. Bernyukevich, T. V. Some discussion issues of conceptualization and typological comparison of cultural universals in contemporary Russian philosophy. Scholarly Notes of Chernyshevsky Transbaikal State Humanitarian-Pedagogical University. Series: Philosophy, cultural studies, social work, no. 4 (27), pp. 6–11, 2009. (In Rus.) 3. Bibikhin, V. V. Grammar of poetry. SPb: Izdatel’stvo Ivana Limbaha, 2009. (In Rus.) 4. Vedenina, L. G. The Concept of a “person” in the language picture of the world. // Linguistics: methods of analysis, education technology. Fourth inter-University seminar on linguistics: collection of articles in 2 parts. M: MGIMO–Universitet, 2007: 146–256. (In Rus.) 5. Vyazemskiy, Yu. P. From Leonardo da Vinci to Niels Bohr. Art and science in questions and answers. M: AST, 2015. (In Rus.) 6. Glagolev, V. S. Verbal and conceptual aspects of the methodological discourse, VII convent RAMI. Vestnik MGIMO–University, no. 6 (27), pp. 216–219, 2012. (In Rus.) 7. Glagolev, V. S. Cultural aspects of art and aesthetic issues in contemporary religious studies. Fundamental problems of cultural studies, 4 volumes: vol. 1. SPb: Izdatel’stvo Altejja, 2008: 5–15. (In Rus.) 8. Glagolev, V. S. Realism of analysis – the initial condition of scientific prospects (co-report). Right and management. XXI century, no. 4, pp. 12–18, 2011. (In Rus.) 9. Dobrokhotov, A. L. I The Problem as a cultural story: conflict of the late Enlightenment and counter enlightenment // Philosophy and culture, no. 8, pp. 82–91, 2011. (In Rus.) 10. Kizima, M. P. Crack peace in the heart of a poet: literature as a feeling // The First World War and the fate of the European civilization. Edited by Belousova, L. S., Manykin, A. S. M: MGU, 2014: 105–121. (In Rus.) 11. Losev, A. F. Essays on ancient symbolism and mythology. M: Mysl’, 1993. (In Rus.) 12. Ornatskaya, L. A., Tul’pe, I. A. Islamic art: cultural aspects of research. Studia Culturae, v. 3, no. 29 (2016), pp. 29–40, 2016. (In Rus.) 13. Silant’eva, M. V. “Another” in the horizon of freedom (an attempt of dialogue through the dim glass of stereotypes). Ricerche slavistiche, no. 13 (59), pp. 153–170, 2015. (In Rus.) 14. Silant’eva, M. V. Philosophy of culture of N. A. Berdyaev and actual problems of our time. M: GASK, 2005. (In Rus.) 15. Silant’eva, M. V. Existential dialectic of N. Berdyaev as a method of modern philosophy. M: Inzhener, 2004. (In Rus.) 16. Simonov, P. V. Lectures on the work of the brain. Need-information theory of higher nervous activity. M: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 1998. (In Rus.) 17. Simonov, P. V., Ershov, P. M. Temperament. Character. Personality. M: Nauka, 1984. (In Rus.) 18. Smirnov, A. V. Proposition and predication. Philosophical journal, v. 9, no. 1, pp. 5–24, 2016. (In Rus.) 19. Tarasov, B. N. Pushkin’s “World responsiveness” and the place of “Imitations of the Koran” in his creative evolution. Literature at school, no. 1, pp. 13–14, 2006. (In Rus.) 20. Tarasov, B. N. The importance of humanitarian knowledge in the modern educational process. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, no. 4, pp. 28–31, 2007. (In Rus.) 21. Torkunov, A. V. On the way to the future-2. M: Aspekt Press, 2015. (In Rus.) 22. Tul’pe, I. A. Mythology. Art. Religion. SPb: Nauka, 2012. (In Rus.) 23. Shestopal, A. V., Silant’eva, M. V. Intercultural communication in the light of contemporary modernization processes. In Intercultural communication: contemporary theory and practice: materials of VIII RISA Convention. M: Aspekt Press, 2013: 10–16. (In Rus.) 24. Cassirer, E. Philosophie der symbolischen Formen 3 Bde. Neuausgabe (bearbeitet von Claus Rosenkranz) in Ernst Cassirer. Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 11–13. Hamburg: Meiner, 2001–2002. (In Germ.)
Full article	Conceptualizing the Anthropological Dimension of the Languages of Knowing in Modern Culture
	0
	7