Article
Article name The Problem of Periodization of History: Single, Special and General
Authors Subbotina N.D. Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, dialectica@yandex. ru
Bibliographic description Subbotina N. D. The Problem of Periodization of History: Single, Special and General // Humanitarian Vector. 2018. Vol. 13, No. 4. PP. 6–16. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2018-13-4-6-16.
Section PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY
UDK 101.8.167
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2018-13-4-6-16
Article type
Annotation In the article, history periodization problems are analyzed. We state that K. Marx’s works have not only a formational periodization, but also at least three periodizations describing history of society as a complete system. The article studies that in a research of the structure of history (periodization), there are different approaches with different abstractness degree depending on a research object. In a variety of periodizations, there is dialectics of single, special and general. If an object is mankind history in general, the most abstract periodization (general) is created, if an object is the world system, a periodization is less abstract (special), if an object is compound world systems, their periodization is less abstract (single). Any periodization has common features. The periodization of history of any object has the right for existence. Reduction of abstractness and expansion of concreteness is transition from history philosophy to concrete history and borders of division of these sciences are not always precisely distinguishable. The periodization of development of society as a complete system, as social evolution is the most general. However, if it is about global evolution, then evolution of society will be its private stage. We also offer as one of options of general, our periodization of history depending on the specifics of prerequisites in development: development of society based on external natural prerequisites and development of society based on the social prerequisites created by society.
Key words history periodization, socioeconomic formation, world-system, single, special, the general
Article information
References 1. Brodel, F. Material civilization, economy, capitalism, the 15–18th centuries. In 3 v. V. 3. Vremya mira. Translated from French by L. E. Kubbel’. M: Ves’ mir, 2007. (In Rus.) 2. Vazyulin, V. A. Logic of history. Questions of the theory and methodology. M: SGU, 2005. (In Rus.) 3. Vallerstain, I. World system of the Modernist style. Volume I. Capitalist agricultural industry and sources of the European world economy in the 16th century. Preface by G. M. Derlug’yan, translated from English, edited by Protsenko, N., Chernyaeva, A. M: Russkij fond sodejstviya obrazovaniyu i nauke, 2015. (In Rus.) 4. Hegel, G. W. F. Encyclopedia of philosophical sciences. V. 1. Logic science. М: Mysl’, 1974. (In Rus.) 5. Marx, K. Sketches of the answer to the letter by V. I. Zasulich. T. 19. M: Politizdat. 1961: 400–421. (In Rus.) 6. Marx, K. Economic manuscripts of 1857–1869 (Initial version of “Capital”). In 2 parts. P. 1. M: Politizdat, 1980. (In Rus.) 7. Marx, K., Engels, F. German ideology. In 50 v. V. 3. 2-e izd. M: Politizdat, 1955. (In Rus.) 8. Pantin, V. I. Waves and cycles of social development. M: Nauka, 2004. (In Rus.) 9. Pronin, A. S. Philosophical and methodological paradigms of a periodization of history. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. М., 2013. (In Rus.) 10. Rozov, N. S. Universal model of historical dynamics. History and present, no.1, pp. 41–63. 2011. (In Rus.) 11. Rozov, N. S. Philosophy and theory of the history. Book the first. Prolegomena. Web. 05.01.2018. http://www.nsu.ru/filf/rozov/publ (In Rus.) 12. Subbotina, N. D. The problem of the relationship between natural and social in society and man. Dr. sci. diss. Ulan-Udeh, 2002. (In Rus.) 13. Subbotina, N. D. Development of society on the basis of naturally arisen means of production and forms of ownership. Cand. sci. diss. Leningrad, 1982. (In Rus.) 14. Subbotina, N. D. Tripartite and binomial periodizations of history of K. Marx in social science education. Tendencies of development of innovative potential of science and modern education. Proceedings of the All-Russian (national) scientific conference. Chita: 8–9 December 2016. 193–197. (In Rus.) 15. Chase-Dunn, K., Holl, T. One, two, much world system. World time. Novosibirsk, 2001, no. 2, pp. 424–448. (In Rus.) 16. Churochkina, L. S. Methodological problems of a periodization of historical process in the Soviet philosophical and historical literature of the 60–80s. Cand. sci. diss. abstr. М., 1990. (In Rus.) 17. Shelina, E. A. Problem of “division” of “historical time” in a modern historiography of France (State-of-the-art review). In Metlitskaya, Z. Yu. Editor. Periodization of history and “transition periods” in a modern foreign historiography. М: RAN. INION: 8–33. (In Rus.) 18. Subbotina, N. D. Рreservation and development within the natural and social evolution. Innovation. Technology transfer and Education. Proceedings of the International Conference. Prague: 3–5 February 2014: 184–191. (In Engl.)
Full articleThe Problem of Periodization of History: Single, Special and General
0
41