Article
Article name	Lexical Features of Free-Indirect Discourse of Andrei Kolesnikov’s Reports
Authors	Teplyashina A.N. Doctor of Philology, Professor, a-nik@list.ru
Bibliographic description	Teplyashina A. N. Lexical Features of Free-Indirect Discourse of Andrei Kolesnikov’s Reports // Humanitarian Vector. 2018. Vol. 13, No.1. PP. 136–143.
Section	MEDIA LINGUISTICS
UDK	070.4
DOI
Article type
Annotation	The article contains a description of some key issues of media text. These questions are related to the category of free-indirect discourse. Discourse is considered as a collection of author’s markers. Markers create an emotional space for reporting. Markers construct reader’s perception. The article describes the possibilities of free-indirect discourse. This discourse is based on the functions of the narrator. This discourse is also based on sense-forming functions of the reportage. The article discusses the use of narrative on the example of a political journalist A. Kolesnikov’s report. In the article features of irony, displays of irony are considered. The examples from A. Kolesnikov’s texts are given. We see how the journalist demonstrates his observations on politicians. We see how effectively reality is depicted. In some cases, when the journalist creates his own image, it is about self-irony. A feature of discourse is the literary style. There is no vernacular, invective vocabulary. Vocabulary shows a significant repertoire of means of creating irony. Irony is seen as a conceptual way of expressing the worldview. Narrative media text imitates the canonical communicative situation. In the unconventional narrative, the reader comes to the fore. To attract the attention of the reader is the super task of the journalist. The fulfillment of this task depends on the mode of perception of the world. It is important to know the author’s attitude to the subject of speech, to the context. Interpretation modes should correspond to the author’s position.
Key words	free-indirect discourse, reportage, narrator, narrative, deixis, irony, improperly direct speech
Article information
References	1. Adorno, T. Aesthetic theory. Moskva: Respublika, 2001. (In Rus.) 2. Bakhtin, M. M. Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Moskva: Iskusstvo, 1979. (In Rus.) 3. Vikulova, L. G., Sharunov, A. I. Fundamentals of the theory of communication. M.: AST Vostok-Zapad, 2008. (In Rus.) 4. Vinogradov, V. V. On the theory of artistic speech. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola, 1971. (In Rus.) 5. Dejk, T. A. van. Language. Cognition. Communication.Translated from English. M. A. Dmitrovskiy, S. N. Suhomlina. Moskva: Progress, 1989. (In Rus.) 6. Erofeeva, I. V. Axiology of media text in Russian culture (the value reflexion of journalism at the beginning of the 21st century). Chita: Zabaikal. gos. gum. ped. un-t, 2009. (In Rus.) 7. Zhurdi, N. V. The narrative form as one of the basic categories of the grammar of the narrative: the question of free-indirect discourse. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, pp. 81–86, 2009. (In Rus.) 8. Evil, especially political, is always a bad stylist. Selected places from the Nobel speech of Joseph Brodsky. Gazeta Ru. 2015. 24 May 9. Issers, O. S. Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech. Moskva: KomKniga, 2006. (In Rus.) 10. Kiselev, A. Yu. Address strategies in popular science discourse (based on the German language). Cand.sci.diss.abstr. Samara, 2012. (In Rus.) 11. Lanskih, A. V. Speech behavior of reality show participants: communicative strategies and tactics. Cand.sci.diss. Ekaterinburg, 2008. (In Rus.) 12. Odintsov, V. V. Stylistics of the text. Moskva: Nauka, 1980. (In Rus.) 13. Os’muhina, O. Yu., Ivanitskiy, A. I. The problem of the author’s strategy as an object of literary analysis. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie, no. 2 (18), pp. 161–162, 2014. (In Rus.) 14. Uspenskiy, B. A. Poetics of the composition: The structure of the artistic text and the typology of the composition form. Moskva: Iskusstvo, 1970. (In Rus.) 15. Shmidt, V. Narratology. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury, 2003. (In Rus.) 16. Dijk, T. A. Van. Kintsch W. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press, 1983. (In Engl.) 17. Downing, J. Internationalizing Media Theory: Transition, Power, Culture. Reflections on Media in Russia, Poland and Hungary, 1980–1995. London: Sage, 1996. (In Engl.) 18. McQuail, D. Origins and Development of the Diels of Study. McQuail D. McQuail’s Reader in Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage, 2006. (In Engl.) 19. McQuail, D. The future of communication studies: A contribution to the debate. Carpentier, N. et al eds. Media and Communication Studies Interventions and Intersections. Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2010. (In Engl.) 20. Mel’nik, G. S., Misonzhnikov, B. Ya., Teplyashina, A. N. Political discourse as the subject transgressive intention. Social sciences, vol. 10, no. 9, рp. 2225–2230, 2015. (In Engl.) 21. Teplyashina, A. N., Mel’nik, G. S., Misonzhnikov, B. Ya., Grishanina, A. N. Sense distortions in the Mass Media: their social consequences. American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol.13, no. 6, рp. 762–772, 2016. 22. Turner, G. Stylistics. Harmondsworth, 1973. (In Engl.)
Full article	Lexical Features of Free-Indirect Discourse of Andrei Kolesnikov’s Reports
	0
	6