| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | The Role of Mass Media in the Process of Statehood of Transdniestria |
| Authors | Oleynikov S.V. Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, olen_serg@inbox.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Oleynikov S. V. The Role of Mass Media in the Process of Statehood of Transdniestria // Humanitarian Vector. 2017. Vol. 12, No. 4. PP. 75–83. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2017-12-4-75-83. |
| Section | General history |
| UDK | 341.231.5+070 |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2017-12-4-75-83 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | Historical analysis of the events of the late 1980s – early 1990s allows us to take a fresh look at the reasons of their emergence and to define potential threats which we can expect in the long term, if we do not learn lessons of the past. The collapse of the once unified state not only caused a parade of sovereignties and formation of the new states, but also changed historical way as all system of a world order as the system of values of the individual. Collision of ideologies and, more widely, civilizations in the countries of the new abroad forced inhabitants of certain regions to rise in defense of the interests, century traditions and the right for life, the culture and language. The huge role in addition to historical, political, economic and cultural factors was played by the arising information institutes of a new type different from the Soviet theory of the press. It was the mass media that transformed and opposed ideological positions of the “title” and “not title” population at the turn of the last decades of the 20th century. Prompt dynamics of an increase in the number of both periodicals and electronic media and appearance of their new information paradigm is reflected in the article. The extraordinary circumstances in which the new media of Pridnestrovye performed as a tool of struggle, ideological opposition with the parent state and consolidation of society in the context of own state construction are described. |
| Key words | “title” and “not title” population, ethnocratic policy, civil conflict, ideological confrontation, consolidation of society |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Babilunga N. V. Taina Pridnestrovskogo fenomena // Natsional’nye obrazy mira: edinstvo – raznoobrazie – spravedlivost’: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (22–23 okt. 2003 g.). Kishinev: Natsional’naya komissiya po delam YuNESKO v RM, 2003. S. 60–69. 2. Belousov V. N. Sotsiolingvisticheskie aspekty dialoga natsional’nykh kul’tur // Natsional’nye obrazy mira: edinstvo – raznoobrazie – spravedlivost’: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (22–23 okt. 2003 g.). Kishinev: Natsional’naya komissiya po delam YuNESKO v RM, 2003. S. 69–78. 3. Bondarenko V. I. Informatsionnoe obespechenie vneshnei politiki Respubliki Moldova v tranzitivnyi period: dis. ... kand. polit. nauk: 10.01.10. SPb., 2004. 254 s. 4. Grosul V. Ya., Guzenkova T. S. Pridnestrov’e // Moldaviya: sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya / pod red. E. M. Kozhokina. M.: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2004. S. 365–448. 5. Guzenkova T. S. Moldaviya i Pridnestrov’e: problemy i tendentsii razvitiya // Moldaviya: sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya / pod red. E. M. Kozhokina. M.: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2004. S. 337–364. 6. Devyatkov A. V. Politika Rossii v otnoshenii Pridnestrovskoi Moldavskoi Respubliki (1992–2009 gg.): avtoref. dis. ... kand. ist. nauk: 07.00.15. N. Novgorod, 2010. 190 s. 7. Zhuravlev V. E. Legitimatsiya pridnestrovskogo gosudarstva: strukturno-funktsional’nyi podkhod. Tiraspol’: Perspektiva, 2005. 164 s. 8. Koval’ski S. V., Bukuch’ A. S. Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo i pridnestrovskii konflikt // Science Time. 2015. № 12. S. 377–383. 9. Kolosov V., Zayats D. Moldova i Pridnestrov’e: natsional’noe stroitel’stvo, territorial’nye identichnosti, perspektivy razresheniya konflikta // Vestnik Evrazii. 2001. Vyp. 1. S. 88–122. 10. Moshnyaga V. G., Ilashchuk D., Spinei F. Konflikt v Moldove: opyt etnopolitologicheskogo analiza. Kishinev: MoldGU, 1992. 46 s. 11. Moshnyaga V. G. Pridnestrovskii konflikt v Respublike Moldova prichiny, sostoyaniya i puti razresheniya // Demokratizatsiya obshchestva v gendernoi perspektive: sb. nauch. tr. / red. V. Mladina. Kishinev: Gender-Tsentr MoldGU, 2002. S. 8–19. 12. Pobeda N. A. Sotsial’naya identichnost’ kak instrument diagnostiki sotsial’noi napryazhennosti v obshchestvakh perekhodnogo perioda // Pridnestrov’e v geopoliticheskoi sisteme koordinat XXI veka. Tiraspol’, 2002. S. 169–176. 50. 13. Pogorelaya E. A. Russkoyazychie: konteksty i podteksty yazykovoi reformy poslednego desyatiletiya XX veka. Tiraspol’: RIO PGU, 2003. 400 s. 14. Tsaranu A. K voprosu o genezise Pridnestrovskogo konflikta v Respublike Moldova // Mezhetnicheskie otnosheniya v postkommunisticheskikh gosudarstvakh: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. / sost. V. G. Moshnyaga. Kishinev: Fond Fridrikha Eberta, 2002. S. 102–129. 15. Shornikov P. M. Moldavskaya samobytnost’. Tiraspol’: Izd-vo Pridnestr. un-ta, 2007. 400 s. 16. Kaufman S., Bowers S. Transnational dimensions of the Transnistrian conflict // Nationalities Papers. 1998. No. 26. P. 129–146. 17. Kølsto P., Edemsky A., Kalashnikova N. The Dniestr Conflict: between Irredentism and Separatism // Europe – Asia Studies. 1993. Vol. 45, No. 6. P. 973–1000. |
| Full article | The Role of Mass Media in the Process of Statehood of Transdniestria |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
