| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Сomparative Aspect of Geographical Terminology of East Transbaikalia |
| Authors | Dyzhitova E.C. Postgraduate Student, katya8003@yandex.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Dyzhitova E. Ch. Сomparative aspect of geographical terminology of East Transbaikalia // Humanitarian Vector. 2016. Vol. 11, No. 5. PP. 6–10. |
| Section | RUSSIAN PHILOLOGY |
| UDK | 811.51 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article is devoted to comparative analysis of geographic terminology as lexical basis of substrate toponyms and those of super strata origin on the territory of Eastern Transbaikalia. Geographical terms, presumably, of Selkup linguistic origin, are of material linguistic similarity with the terms of the Buryat language. The methodological basis of investigation is based on comparative and descriptive methods. The attempt of comparative analysis of geographical terminology on the example of the Buryat sheber meaning 1) “thicket, thick forest (with predominance of spruce and larch)’’; 2) tunc. ‘‘the swamp (in the forest)” and Selkup chvor “a place covered with bushes and flooded in spring”, Buryat hunger “valley, hollow log, hollow, valley, a large ravine” and Nenets hengar promotes the establishment of a typologically similar elements in the terms of unrelated languages. This mapping allows us to report on the relevance of more thorough study of the local geographical terminology in comparative, typological aspects to identify and confirm the effects of the Samoyedic languages in a number of Altaic languages, first and foremost, in the Buryat language. |
| Key words | language substrate, diachronic language contact, comparative analysis, typology, geographical terminology, Buryat, Selkup, Nenets |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Belikov V. I. Yazykovye kontakty i genealogicheskaya klassifikatsiya // Vopr. yazykovogo rodstva. 2009. № 1. S. 49–68. 2. Dyzhitova E. Ch. O proiskhozhdenii geograficheskogo termina «sunkok» // Vestn. Chuvash. gos. ped. un-ta im. I. Ya. Yakovleva. 2015. № 4. S. 36–41. 3. Zhamsaranova R. G. Yavleniya konvergentsii i transferentsii v leksike buryatskogo i sel’kupskogo yazykov // Vestn. TGPU. 2011. Vyp. 3. S. 140–147. 4. Zhamsaranova R. G. Substrat v toponimii Vostochnogo Zabaikal’ya. Chita: ZabGU, 2011. 237 s. 5. Zhamsaranova R. G. Sravnitel’no-sopostavitel’nyi analiz appelyativnoi leksiki buryatskogo i nenetskogo yazykov // Aktual’nye problemy sinkhronii i diakhronii raznostrukturnykh yazykov: materialy Vseros. (s mezhdunar. uchastiem) nauch. konf., posvyashch. 85-letiyu V. I. Zolkhoeva / otv. red. V. M. Egodurova. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo Buryat. gos. un-ta, 2013. S. 127–131. 6. Zhamsaranova R. G. Kontseptosfera srednevekovoi mongol’skoi etnonimii. Chita: Ekspress-izd-vo, 2013. 288 s. 7. Rassadin V. I. Ocherki po istoricheskoi fonetike buryatskogo yazyka. M.: Nauka, 1982. 199 s. Istochniki 8. Buryatsko-russkii slovar’ / sost. K. M. Cheremisov. M.: Sov. entsikl., 1973. 804 s. 9. Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ / pod red. V. N. Yartsevoi; In-t yazykoznaniya AN SSSR. M.: Sov. entsikl., 1990. 682 s. 10. Sel’kupsko-russkii dialektnyi slovar’ / pod red. V. V. Bykonya. Tomsk, 2005. 348 s. 11. Dic.academic.ru [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/brokgauz_efron (data obrashcheniya: 08.06.2016). |
| Full article | Сomparative Aspect of Geographical Terminology of East Transbaikalia |
| 0 | |
| 0 | |
