Article
Article name Phenomenon of the Political Reporting of Andrey Kolesnikov, the Special Correspondent of the Newspaper Kommersant
Authors Teplyashina A.N. Doctor of Philology, Professor, a-nik@list.ru
Bibliographic description Teplyashina A. N. Phenomenon of the political reporting of Andrey Kolesnikov, the special correspondent of the newspaper Kommersant // Humanitarian Vector. 2016. Vol. 11, No. 5. PP. 137–147. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2016-11-5-137-147
Section MEDIA LINGUISTICS
UDK 070.4
DOI 10.21209/1996-7853-2016-11-5-137-147
Article type
Annotation The article is devoted to the problem of emotional interpretation of the news on the activities of the government. The analysis of the existing practice is carried out on material of the newspaper Kommersant. Andrey Kolesnikov has been working as a special correspondent for this newspaper for 20 years. His reports mastery is highly appreciated by both the editorial and the audience of the edition. The purpose of the article is to prove that school of mastery for the journalist is Russian literature with its rich traditions of the appeal to an esthetics of the comic as socio-political criticism. Comic is considered as alternative of an infotainment which in generally estimated in a negative way. The article focuses on the idea that humorous discourse of the mass culture makes an infotainment basis. Humorous discourse of the mass culture making an infotainment basis leads to decline of education and awareness of audience. The comic in journalism, poetics comic, traditions and innovation comic in the political media text, factors of impact of emotional intelligence of the author on the audience, perception comic readers, interliterary communications are covered in the article. Following the results of the analysis it is possible to note the following lines which distinguish Kolesnikov’s works: high extent of personification, a strong author’s beginning, conversationality, clever irony, the active appeal to motives and images of the Russian satirical literature, orientation to intellectual, educated audience, fascination of a statement thanks to the background knowledge and language game.
Key words political media text, Russian literature, esthetics comic, tradition, emotional intelligence, infotainment
Article information
References 1. Aizenk G. Yu. Intellekt: novyi vzglyad // Vopr. psikhologii. 1995. № 1. S. 111–131. 2. Brandes M. P. Stilistika nemetskogo yazyka. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1983. 271 s. 3. Vartanova E. L. Mediaekonomika zarubezhnykh stran. M.: Aspekt-Press, 2003. 335 s. 4. Volkov I. F. Tvorcheskie metody i khudozhestvennye sistemy. M.: Iskusstvo, 1978. 264 s. 5. Vinogradov V. V. O yazyke khudozhestvennoi prozy. M.: Nauka, 1980. 360 s. 6. Gal’perin I. R. Problemy lingvostilistiki // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Vyp. 9. Lingvostilistika. M.: Progress, 1980. S. 3–11. 7. Dmitrieva O. A. Mekhanizm vospriyatiya pretsedentnogo teksta // Yazykovaya lichnost’: aspekty lingvistiki i lingvodidaktiki. Volgograd: Peremena, 1999. 196 s. 8. Dolinin K. A. Implitsitnoe soderzhanie vyskazyvaniya // Vopr. yazykoznaniya. 1983. № 6. S. 37–47. 9. Erofeeva I. V. Tvorcheskoe myshlenie zhurnalista i natsional’naya Model’ Mira: ucheb.-metod. posobie. Chita: ZabGGPU, 2008. 216 s. 10. Zemlyanova L. M. Zarubezhnaya kommunikativistika v preddverii informatsionnogo obshchestva: tolkovyi slov. terminov i kontseptsii. M.: Izd-vo Moskov. un-ta, 1999. 300 s. 11. Kaida L. G. Stil’ fel’etona. Vyrazhenie avtorskoi pozitsii. M.: Izd-vo Moskov. un-ta, 1983. 59 s. 12. Kamenskii A. A. O smysle khudozhestvennoi traditsii // Sov. iskusstvoznanie. 1982. № 1. S. 200–210. 13. Karaulov Yu. N. Russkii yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost’. M.: Nauka, 1987. S. 3–8. 14. Kiseleva R. A. Interpretatsiya podteksta v ramkakh stilistiki dekodirovaniya // Ekspressivnye sredstva angliiskogo yazyka: sb. nauch. rabot. L.: LPI im. A. I. Gertsena, 1975. S. 67–78. 15. Kiseleva R. A. Strukturno-semanticheskaya organizatsiya i interpretatsiya podteksta khudozhestvennoi rechi: ucheb. posobie. Vologda: Vologod. ped. in-t, 1986. 92 s. 16. Krylova I. N. Podtekstovye znacheniya v rasskaze E. Khemingueya «Na Big-River» // Analiz stilei zarubezhnoi khud. i nauch. lit.: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. st. L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1982. Vyp. 3. S. 84–88. 17. Levitskii Yu. A. Problema tipologii tekstov. Perm’: Izd-vo Perm. un-ta, 1998. 106 s. 18. Leiderman N. L. Teoriya zhanra. Ekaterinburg: UGPU, 2010. 904 s. 19. Likhachev D. S. Zakonomernosti i antizakonomernosti v literature // Rus. lit. 1986. № 3. S. 44–50. 20. Losev A. F. Znak, simvol, mif. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1982. 481 s. 21. Losev A. F. V poiskakh smysla // Vopr. lit. 1985. № 10. S. 222–227. 22. Luriya A. Ya. Osnovnye problemy neirolingvistiki. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1975. 431 s. 23. Mikhailov S. A. Zhurnalistika Soedinennykh Shtatov Ameriki. SPb.: Izd-vo Mikhailova V. A., 2004. 448 s. 24. Poelueva L. A. Fakt v publitsistike: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. M.: Izd-vo Moskov. un-ta, 1988. 18 s. 25. Pospelov G. N. Teoriya literatury. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1978. 351 s. 26. Spirkin A. G. Chelovek, kul’tura, traditsiya // Traditsiya v istorii kul’tury. M.: Nauka, 1980. S. 5–14. 27. Sil’man T. I. Podtekst – glubina teksta // Vopr. lit. 1969. № 1. S. 89–102. 28. Sulkovskii I. Podtekst v sisteme tekstovykh i vnetekstovykh svyazei // Marksizm-leninizm i problemy teorii literatury: tezisy dokladov nauch. konf. Alma-Ata: Kazakh. un-t, 1969. S. 101–103. 29. Susov I. P. Semanticheskaya struktura predlozheniya. Tula, 1973. 141 s. 30. Tynyanov Yu. N. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino. M.: Nauka, 1977. 574 s. 31. Finkel’shtein I. L. Kheminguei-romanist. Gody 20-e i 30-e. Gor’kii: Volgo-Vyatskoe kn. izd-vo, 1974. 216 s. 32. Shestak L. A. Pretsedentnyi tekst v strukture russkoi yazykovoi lichnosti: kognitivnaya priroda i strukturnye modeli // Iskusstvo, obrazovanie, nauka v preddverii III tysyacheletiya. Volgograd, 1999. S. 448–452. 33. Bernhard U. Infotainment in der Zeitung. Der EinfluЯ unterhaltungsorientierter Gestaltungsmitte l auf die Wahrnehmung und Verarbeitung politischer Informationen. Baden-Baden, 2012. S. 527–542. 34. Eliot T. S. Selected Essays. London: L. f., 1963. 306 р. 35. Kropotkin P. Russian literature. N. Y. : New Directions, 1905. 404 р. 36. Nabokov V. Nicolay Gogol. Norfolk: New Directions, 1944. 170 p. 37. O`Connor F. The Conely Voice. New York: Cleveland, 1963. 225 p. 38. Postman N. Wir amьsieren uns zu Tode: Urteilsbildung im Zeitalter der Unterhaltu ngsindustrie. Frankfurtam- Main, 2008. 234 s. 39. Rahv Ph. Gogol as a modern Instance. In.: The mith and the Powerhouse. N. Y., 1965. 242 р. Istochniki 40. Bol’shoi tolkovyi slovar’ rus. yazyka. SPb.: Norrint, 1998. 1536 s. 41. Kolesnikov A. Zdravy budem, bochare! // Kommersant»». 2015. 17 sent. 42. Kolesnikov A. Voinstvuyushchii molochnik // Kommersant»». 2015. 18 sent. 43. Kolesnikov A. Obama glyadel na Putina, Putin – na zhurnalistov // Kommersant»». 2015. 29 sent. 44. Kolesnikov A. Demontazh protsedury // Kommersant»». 2003. 4 noyab. 45. Kolesnikov A. Kak ya ne vyshel na pensiyu // Kommersant»». 2003. 12 noyab. 46. Kolesnikov A. A zony zdes’ tikhie // Kommersant»». 2015. 27 noyab. 47. Kolesnikov A. Odnazhdy v studenuyu zimnyuyu... forum // Kommersant»». 2016. 25 yanv. 48. Kolesnikov A. Intrigiganty mysli // Kommersant»». 2016. 1 marta. 49. Kolesnikov A. Vladimir Putin posetil Dobrodeevo // Kommersant»». 2016. 13 maya. 50. Kolesnikov A. Skazka o tsare i sultane // Kommersant»». 2016. 19 maya. 51. Kolesnikov A. Kak Vladimir Putin i Aleksandr Lukashenko vstrechalis’ v Minske // Kommersant»». 2016. 8 iyunya. 52. Kratkaya literaturnaya entsiklopediya: v 9 t. M.: Sov. entsikl., 1975. 53. Literaturnyi entsiklopedicheskii slovar’. M.: Sov. entsikl., 1987. 752 s. 54. Lozovskii B. N. Zhurnalistika: kratkii slov. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.virlib.eunnet. net/metod_materials/jdictionary/?xsln=article (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2016). 55. Ozhegov C. I. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka. 20-e izd. M.: Rus. yaz., 1988. 748 s.
Full articlePhenomenon of the Political Reporting of Andrey Kolesnikov, the Special Correspondent of the Newspaper Kommersant
0
3