| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | Conceptual Semantics of Onomaconcept Wolf |
| Authors | Tibin’ko N.D. Senior Teacher, n.vold@bk.ruZhamsaranova R.G. Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, rebeca_zab@mail.ru |
| Bibliographic description | Zhamsaranova R. G. Conceptual Semantics of Onomaconcept Wolf // Humanitarian Vector. 2017. Vol. 12, No. 2. PP. 152–162. DOI 10/21209/1996-7853-2017-12-2-152-162. |
| Section | ORIENTAL STUDIES |
| UDK | 81’373.2; 811.512.31 |
| DOI | 10.21209/1996-7853-2017-12-2-152-162 |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article deals with the method of etymology of ethnonimic proper name Mongol. The conceptual semantic of ethnonimic name is revealed through introduction of a new term onomaconcept and its structural analysis. Onomaconcept as a type of linguacultural concept is able to depict pre-ethnonimic as well as the proper-ethnonimic meaning of the onoma analyzed. First, the reconstruction of a conceptual semantic field of ethnonimic name by onoma and conceptual analysis let us to suppose the etymology of the name. Secondly, this method gives the possibility to model the conceptual sphere of nomadic mentality. The method of scientific investigation of onomaconcept is based on methods of conceptual analysis; component-analysis in order to know well all word definitions of the concept; onoma method depicting ethno-cultural and ethno-historical background of the analyzed concept; method of semasiological analysis and others. Complex analysis of propriety lexicon makes it possible to reconstruct the system of archaic mental orientations, reflexes, and the mentality of middle-aged nomads. Lingua-cultural description of nomadic picture of life makes possible the reconstruction on early nomadic period, especially the period of foundation of the Altaic languages. Conceptual description of ethnonimic names on the basis of typology of non-related languages promoted thesis of similar linguistic correlations of different languages – Mongol and Samoedic ones. |
| Key words | ethnonimic name Mongol, onomaconcept wolf, onoma method, conceptual semantics, linguistic picture of nomadic world |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Babenko L. G., Vasil’ev I. E., Kazarin Yu. V. Lingvisticheskii analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2000. 533 s. 2. Bykonya V. V. Sel’kupy: yazyk i kul’tura (etnolingvisticheskii ocherk). Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomsk. gos. ped. un-ta, 2011. 236 s. 3. Vezhbitskaya A. Ponimanie kul’tur cherez posredstvo klyuchevykh slov. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, 2001. 288 s. 4. Vorkachev S. G. Voploshchenie smysla: conceptualia selecta. Volgograd: Paradigma, 2014. 331 s. 5. Georgi I. G. Opisanie vsekh obitayushchikh v Rossiiskom gosudarstve narodov: ikh zhiteiskikh obryadov, obyknovenii, odezhd, zhilishch, uprazhnenii, zabav, veroispovedanii i drugikh dostoprimechatel’nostei / predisl. i prim. V. A. Dmitrieva; perepech. s izd. 1799 g. s ispr. i dop. 2-e izd. SPb.: Russkaya simfoniya, 2007. 799 s. 6. Zhamsaranova R. G. Tipologicheskii analiz buryatsko-sel’kupskoi terminologii rodstva // Vestn. Tomsk. gos. un-ta. Ser. Filologiya. 2009. № 324. 7. Zhamsaranova R. G. Kontseptosfera srednevekovoi mongol’skoi etnonimii: avtoref. … d-ra filol. nauk: 10.02.20. Tomsk, 2011. 50 s. 8. Zhamsaranova R. G. Substrat v toponimii Vostochnogo Zabaikal’ya. Chita: ZabGU, 2001. 237 s. 9. Zhamsaranova R. G. Kontseptosfera srednevekovoi mongol’skoi etnonimii. Chita: Ekspress-izd-vo, 2013. 288 s. 10. Zhamsaranova R. G. Onimy Nelyudskii ostrog (Nerchinskii ostrog), Nikanskoe tsarstvo i gosudarstvo Gou- Go v aspekte tsivilizatsionnykh protsessov Severnoi Azii // Tomsk. zhurn. lingv. i antropologicheskikh issled. 2014. Vyp. 2. S. 41–49. 11. Ipanova O. A. Kontsept «zhizn’» v russkoi yazykovoi kartine mira: lingvokul’turologicheskii i leksikograficheskii aspekty: avtoref. dic. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.01. SPb., 2005. 24 s. 12. Istoriya Vostochnogo Zabaikal’ya. Chitinskaya oblast’ / otv. red. I. I. Kirillov. Irkutsk: Izd-vo IGEA, 2001. 283 s. 13. Istoriya Sibiri. T.1. Drevnyaya Sibir’. L.: Nauka, 1968. 454 s. 14. Kaksin A. D. Koibal’skii govor khakasskogo yazyka: traditsionnye i novye podkhody v voprosakh dokumentatsii // Aktual’nye problemy dialektologii yazykov narodov Rossii: materialy XIV Vseros. nauch. konf (g. Ufa, 20–22 noyab. 2014 g.). Ufa: IIYaL UNTs RAN, 2014. S. 58–61. 15. Kravchenko A. V. Yazyk i vospriyatie // Kognitivnye aspekty yazykovoi kategorizatsii. Irkutsk, 1996. S. 34–41. 16. Novikova K. A. Nazvaniya domashnikh zhivotnykh v tunguso-man’chzhurskikh yazykakh // Issledovaniya v oblasti etimologii altaiskikh yazykov. L., 1979. S. 53–134. 17. Pimenova M. V. Metodologiya kontseptual’nykh issledovanii // Vestn. Kemer. un-ta. Ser. Filologiya. 2002. Vyp. 4. 18. Pimenova M. V. Metodologiya kontseptual’nykh issledovanii // Antologiya kontseptov / otv. red. V. I. Karasik, I. A. Sternin. Volgograd: Paradigma, 2005. T. 1. 19. Radlov V. V. Iz Sibiri: stranitsy dnevnika / per. s nem. K. D. Tsivinoi, B. E. Chistovoi; primech. i poslesl. S. I. Vainshteina. M.: Nauka,1989. 749 s. 20. Rassadin V. I. Ocherki po istoricheskoi fonetike buryatskogo yazyka. M.: Nauka, 1982. 199 s. 21. Rumyantsev G. N. Buryatskie letopisi kak istoricheskii istochnik // Tr. BKNII SO AN SSSR. Ser. Vostokovedenie. Ulan-Ude, 1960. Vyp.3. S.3–16. 22. Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty: slovar’ russkoi kul’tury. 3-e izd. ispr. i dop. M., 2004. 992 s. 23. Sternin I. A. Kognitivnaya interpretatsiya v lingvokognitivnykh issledovaniyakh // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2004. № 1. 24. Toporova T. V. Semanticheskaya struktura drevnegermanskoi modeli mira. M., 1994. 190 s. 25. Tuchkova N. A., Baidak A. V., Maksimova N. P. Yuzhnosel’kupskaya etnonimika // Problemy istorikokul’turnogo razvitiya drevnikh i traditsionnykh obshchestv Zapadnoi Sibiri i sopredel’nykh territorii: materialy XIII Zap.-Sib. arkheologo-etnograf. konf. Tomsk: TGU, 2005. S. 279–282. 26. Khaidu Peter. Ural’skie yazyki i narody / per. s venger. E. A. Khelimskogo. M.: Progress, 1985. 430 s. 27. Tsydendambaev Ts. B. Buryatskie istoricheskie khroniki i rodoslovnye (istoriko-lingvisticheskoe issledovanie). Ulan-Ude, 1972. 662 s. 28. Shavkunov E. V. Kul’tura chzhurchzhenei-udige XII–XIII vv. i problema proiskhozhdeniya tungusskikh narodov Dal’nego Vostoka. M.: Nauka, 1990. 282 s. Istochniki 29. Buryaad-orod slovar’ = Buryatsko-russkii slovar’ / sost. K. M. Cheremisov. M.: Sov. entsikl., 1973. 804 s. 30. Mongol-oros tol’ = Mongol’sko-russkii slovar’ / pod obshch. red. Luvsandendeva. M.: Gos. izd-vo in. i nats. slov., 1957. 715 s. 31. Nenetsko-russkii slovar’ / sost. N. M. Tereshchenko. M.: Sov. entsikl., 1965. 942 s. 32. Kitaisko-russkii slovar’ / pod red. Sya Chun I. Pekin: Izd-vo Un-ta inostr. yazykov g. Shankhaya, 1992. 1250 s. 33. Sel’kupsko-russkii dialektnyi slovar’ / pod red. V. V. Bykonya. Tomsk: Izd-vo TGPU, 2005. 348 s. 34. Sravnitel’nyi slovar’ tunguso-man’chzhurskikh yazykov: materialy k etimologicheskomu slovaryu: v 2 t. / otv. red. V. I. Tsintsius. L.: Nauka, 1975. T. 1. 672 s.; T. 2. L., 1977. 992 s. |
| Full article | Conceptual Semantics of Onomaconcept Wolf |
| 0 | |
| 13 | |
