| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | The Specific of Personal Resources Relations and Life Quality Subjective Assessment among Army Conscripts |
| Authors | Neyaskina Y.Y. Candidate of Psychology, Associate Professor, neyasknaju@yandex.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | Personality Psychology: Different Perspectives of Analysis |
| UDK | 159.923 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The article summarizes the outcomes of the research aiming to distinguish the specifics of personal resources and their interrelations with the life quality subjective assessment by army conscripts. On the basis of cluster indication of various personal resources there were formed the experimental groups essentially differentiated in the parameters of life sustainability, tolerance for indefiniteness on the scales of fatalistic and hedonistic present of time perspective methodic. The received groups were compared by the parameters of subjective life quality assessment; the interrelations between personal resources and life quality subjective assessment parameters within each experimental group were also searched and described. It was determined that the groups with different grades of personal resources demonstrate similar assessments of subjective life quality. The comparison of spheres importance and satisfaction with them among the respondents of each group proves the fact that the young people with low manifestation of personal resources demonstrate life satisfaction indication on numerous scales which exceeds the parameters of their importance. The respondents possessing high level of resources are, apparently, characterized with the higher level of life goals specification, higher demands for themselves and own achievements (but due to their age still have not got around the set life tasks). It is shown that different types of personal resources manifestation of army conscripts stipulates different types of interrelations between life spheres, life values, their satisfaction and indicators of life comprehension, sustainability, tolerance for uncertainty, time perspective. |
| Key words | life quality, satisfaction with life, personal resources, life comprehension, sustainability, tolerance for uncertainty, personality’s time perspective |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Kozhevnikova E.Yu. Lichnostnye resursy preodoleniya situatsii sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi deprivatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk. Krasnodar, 2006. 20 s. 2. Leont’ev D. A. Test smyslozhiznennykh orientatsii (SZhO). M.: Smysl, 2000. 18 s. 3. Leont’ev D. A., Rasskazova E. I. Test zhiznestoikosti. M.: Smysl, 2006. 63 s. 4. Neyaskina Yu.Yu. Vzaimosvyaz’ lichnostnykh resursov i sub”ektivnoi otsenki kachestva zhizni (na primere osmyslennosti zhizni i zhiznestoikosti) // Vestn. Kemer. gos. un-ta. 2014. № 3–1. S. 135–143. 5. Osin E. N. Faktornaya struktura versii shkaly obshchei tolerantnosti k neopredelennosti D. Mak Leina // Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika, 2010. № 2. S. 65–86. 6. Rasskazova E. I. Metodika otsenki kachestva zhizni i udovletvorennosti: psikhometricheskie kharakteristiki russkoyazychnoi versii // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. 2012. T. 9. S. 81–90. 7. Syrtsova, A. A. Adaptatsiya oprosnika vremennoi perspektivy lichnosti F. Zimbardo / A. A. Syrtsova, E. T. Sokolova, O. V. Mitina // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2008. T. 29. № 3. S. 101–109. 8. Frisch, M. Quality of Life Inventory. Complementary Trial Package. Pearson. 2007. |
| Full article | The Specific of Personal Resources Relations and Life Quality Subjective Assessment among Army Conscripts |
| 0 | |
| 6 | |
