| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | The Estimation of Postmodernism in the Contemporary Russian Socio-Humanistic Studies |
| Authors | Rutskova V.S. Postgraduate Student, ruckova-veronika@rambler.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | PROBLEMS OF HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY |
| UDK | 101.1:316 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The beginning of the XX century was marked with the transition from the classical type of thinking of the era of the modernist style to the non-classical one and further to post-non-classical style. The transition of society, science and culture to qualitatively new state became a message for the emergence of the new term which could characterize the happened changes. So the concept “postmodernism” arose during the attempt to rethink new tendencies in the West in the second half of the XX century. Nowadays the studying of the phenomenon of postmodernism became topicality again, in connection with uncertainty of the further world development. More and more scientists pay attention to postmodernism problems. The purpose of this article is the explanation of the concept “postmodernism” and the analyses of different approaches to the estimation of that philosophical and cultural current, having marked in the modern Russian science. The author shows the history of the concept “postmodernism” shortly, and pays attention to the author considers various estimates of a postmodernism among the Russian researchers, such as I. P. Ilyin, B. N. Kuritsin, Y. N. Davydov, P. K. Grechko, M. N. Epstein, etc. and makes the appropriated conclusion. |
| Key words | postmodernism, postmodern, culture, society, modernity |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Grechko P. K. Intellektual’nyi import, ili O periferiinom postmodernizme // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2000. № 2. S. 166–177. 2. Davydov Yu. N. Patologichnost’ «sostoyaniya postmodernizma» // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2001. № 11. S. 3–12. 3. D’yakov V. A. «Postmodern ne ushel»: beseda s V. M. Dianovoi // KhORA. 2009. № 1. S. 159–165. 4. Evlampiev V. V. Neklassicheskaya metafizika, ili Konets metafiziki? Evropeiskaya filosofiya na rasput’e // Voprosy filosofii. 2003. № 5. S. 159–179. 5. Il’in I. P. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm. M.: Intrada, 1996. 252 s. 6. Kuritsyn V. N. Russkii literaturnyi postmodernizm. M.: Izd-vo OGI, 2001. 288 s. 7. Kutyrev V. A. Filosofiya postmodernizma: nauchno-obrazovatel’noe posobie dlya magistrov i aspirantov gumanitarnykh spetsial’nostei. Nizhnii Novgorod: Izd-vo Volgo-Vyatskoi akad. gos. sluzhby, 2006. 95 s. 8. Rykov A. V. Postmodernizm kak «radikal’nyi konservatizm»: Problema khudozhestvenno-teoreticheskogo konservatizma i amerikanskaya teoriya sovremennogo iskusstva 1960–1990-kh gg. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2007. 376 s. 9. Titov D. Situatsiya postmoderna v filosofii i kul’ture. Mesto i rol’ khippi v stanovlenii postmodernizma [Elektronnyi resurs] // Elektronnaya biblioteka Gumer. URL: http://www.gumer.info /bibliotek_Buks /Culture /Article / Tit_SitPost.php (data obrashcheniya: 06.12.2014). 10. Tsareva N. A. K otsenke postmodernizma v sovremennoi rossiiskoi filosofii [Elektronnyi resurs] // Analitika kul’turologii: elektron. nauch. izd. 2007. № 8. URL: http://www.analiculturolog.ru /journal /archive /item /1651 (data obrashcheniya: 05.12.2014). 11. Epshtein M. N. Postmodern v Rossii. Literatura i teoriya. M.: Izd-vo R. Elinina, 2000, 368 s. |
| Full article | The Estimation of Postmodernism in the Contemporary Russian Socio-Humanistic Studies |
| 0 | |
| 10 | |
