| Article | |
|---|---|
| Article name | The Problem of Reality in its Correlation with the Conscience Reality |
| Authors | Chernikova I.V. Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, chernic@mail.tsu.ru |
| Bibliographic description | |
| Section | THE PROBLEM OF REALITY AND ITS REFLECTION |
| UDK | 001.1 |
| DOI | |
| Article type | |
| Annotation | The paper is focused on the problem of reality in its correlation with the conscience reality. It is highlighted that the classical epistemology interprets reality as independent of conscience. Contemporary epistemology (nonclassical epistemology) distinguishes two approaches: fundamentalists claiming for perception of independent of conscience reality and constructivists with the main idea that we cannot know reality independent of conscience, we are able to study empirical reality, which we construct in process of interaction with the external reality. In contemporary natural science we witness a shift from subject oriented cognition to perception of reality interpreted as interaction, correlation, from “thingish”, visually observable reality to reality constructed in our conscience. The focus in cognition of principles of reality moved to questions of meaning-making. Contemporary philosophy of science understands science not only as a system of theoretical statements, but as interpretative practice of the live world. Addressing to practice, ethical component and humanization characterize new scientific constructions. Adequate philosophic interpretation of such a reality is integral with mental and communicative processes. World ontology in new science opens through humane psychology. We learn to see the world not only through technical devices, but through humane being as well. It reveals the relativisation of the scientific cognition, but not the refusal from the scientific realism as from the most important parameter of the scientific worldview and objectivity as value of science. |
| Key words | reality, evolution, language, conscience, cognition, constructivism, scientific realism, culture, relativisation of science |
| Article information | |
| References | 1. Dennet D. Vidy psikhiki. Na puti k ponimaniyu soznaniya. M.: Ideya-Press. 2004. 184 s. 2. Luman N. Evolyutsiya. M.: Logos, 2005. 256 s. 3. Mamchur E. A. O relyativnosti, relyativizme i istine // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, 2004. № 1. S. 76–81. 4. Mikeshina L. A. Relyativizm kak epistemologicheskaya problema // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2004. № 1. S. 53–64. 5. Mikeshina L. A. Filosofiya poznaniya. Polemicheskie glavy. M.: Progress-Traditsiya. 2002. 624 s. 6. Nikiforov A. L. Neobkhodimost’ absolyutnogo // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2004. № 1. S. 70–73. 7. Sokal A., Brikmon Zh. Intellektual’nye ulovki (kritika sovremennoi filosofii postmoderna). M.: Dom intellektual’noi knigi, 2002. 241 s. 8. Chernikova I. V. Transformatsiya predstavlenii o real’nosti v nauke i filosofii // Gumanitarnyi vektor. Ser.: Filosofiya. Kul’turologiya. 2014. № 2 (38). S. 79–89. 9. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. M., 2004. № 1. S. 53–81. 10. Yulina N. S. Golovolomki problemy soznaniya: kontseptsiya Deniela Denneta. M.: Kanon+, 2004. 544 s. 11. Yulina N. S. Dennet o viruse postmodernizma. Polemika s R. Rorti o soznanii i realizme // Voprosy filosofii. 2001. № 8. S. 78–93. |
| Full article | The Problem of Reality in its Correlation with the Conscience Reality |
| 0 | |
| 4 | |
